Tendulkar favours no referrals but more technology

[Sachinism]

Sachin Tendulkar has admitted that he's not in favour of the umpire referrals system and prefers technology - including Hot Spot for bat-pad catches - to be extended to all decisions except lbw appeals and where the batsman is bowled. Tendulkar also suggested that the umpires in the middle be rotated in the same match, which would allow them time to rest, recharge and concentrate better. His views echoed those of recently retired umpire Steve Bucknor and former Test umpire Peter Willey. "I'm not particularly happy with the referrals because I'm not convinced of the angles (on television)," Tendulkar told India Today magazine. "I'm not convinced. I wasn't happy when we first went through it [on India's tour of Sri Lanka last year]." The referrals system was first tried out during India's Sri Lanka tour and the innovation has since been used only on a trial basis though it will be re-introduced on a permanent basis from this month. However, Tendulkar said he was in favour of increasing technology in cricket to reduce the load on the umpire, helping him to be more focused and therefore more accurate. "It is tough for the umpires to watch the no-balls and watch what's happening in the front. For the basic line decisions you have to have a laser or something like that... the no-ball is like tennis (in which there is a beep during a let when the ball hits the net during a serve)... you can call it with a machine." After the initial trials, the ICC had decided to include the Hot Spot to assist the third umpire. Tendulkar welcomed the innovation and added that cricket should capitalise on that aid. "We are still using technology for close catches," Tendulkar said. "They should use the Hot Spot for the bat-pad decision so the main umpire has to only make the LBW calls. I'm quite happy with the Hot Spot because that establishes the contact. "For the caught behind, the Hot Spot will come. Close in catches again the Hot Spot will come. You don't need a machine for the clean bowled, so the lbw decisions are all the umpire has to concentrate on." Tendulkar understood the pressure on-field umpires face these days with every error - glaring or marginal - scrutnised and criticized by experts. He said a rotation system within the same game may help. "Maybe we could have umpires doing a session each and so have three umpires for a game, so umpires do get time off also." http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/431199.html

[Ram]

Another high-profile player speaks out against referrals. If I can take the liberty of sounding a bit smug, nearly two years ago, when there was all this fire and furore over poor umpiring decisions and the impact it has on games, I made a comprehensive case for technology as an aid for the on-field umpires in this thread. http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=87333& Sachin has all but echoed my sentiments. His suggestion of rotating umpires within a game also seems an interesting way of combating umpire fatigue. Its interesting to think a system of on-field decision making that was considered reasonably effective for more than a 100 years, all of a sudden became a target of dramatic reform. The ICC and anyone calling for a comprehensive over-haul of the general process of umpiring have a genuine case. Every possible step that can be taken that can minimize on field errors must be taken. But the ICC started at the wrong end of the solution by deciding up-front that the way to go about it is to give the players/technology to ability to completely over-rule an umpiring decision. Rather, they should have first attempted several middle-ground approaches that could have drastically cut down umpiring errors.

[The Outsider]

Referrals are used only for line decisions anyways - whether the ball pitched in line, whether the impact was in line - I don't know what Tendulkar is talking about here?

[kabira]

in other words, he is asking umpires to refer it rather than captains

[cowboysfan]

the whole point of referrals is it gives some control to challenge bad decisions of umpires.the umpires are not going to challenge their own decisions a lot.Tendulkar is wrong on this one. i like his idea about no balls though.

[Zap_Brannigan]

He doesnt believe in the existing technology to properly judge LBW since he thinks that the line judged is based on the angle of the camera. Although that is true, IIRX hawkeye already has 3 cameras at a certain angle to judge the line properly. He basically said that he likes to have tv replays for everything else. So he wants it but not unless its perfected.