The Outsider Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 http://www.cricinfo.com/indvsl2009/content/current/story/436935.html Sri Lanka came into the series intending to secure their maiden Test victory on Indian soil but were left with a lot of soul searching to do after they were thrashed by an innings-and-144-runs in the second Test in Kanpur. Though India ran up 642, Sri Lanka captain Kumar Sangakkara defended the selection of three spinners. "If we had won the toss and batted first on the wicket and got a decent amount of runs on the board our spinners would have been quite a threat on this track," he said. "It would have been very hard to score runs off them as well. The chances that we did create were not taken by us, allowing the Indian batsmen to get away on a really flat track. 400 runs on the first day was a little too much." The main concern for Sri Lanka was the inability of the world's leading wicket-taker Muttiah Muralitharan to provide the breakthroughs for his team as he had done till the recent past. Murali went for over hundred runs for the second time in two Tests; so far in the series his returns are five wickets for 396 runs, average 79.20. "It does become a concern when your star strike bowler is not really picking up the wickets you know he can, but he is still the best bowler that's played the game," Sangakkara said. "You still have to have faith in him and trust him and back him 100% to do the job because he is going to do it at one point, hopefully in the next Test." The Kanpur defeat was the largest in terms of runs to India but Sangakkara remained optimistic that he had the bowlers to win in Mumbai. "We have the potential to pick 20 wickets with the bowlers that we have," he said. "Potential is one thing really doing the job is another. We would like a bit more penetration with the spin. "With our fast bowlers we always created opportunities, the disappointing thing is we haven't really taken those chances twice in the first over in two Test matches, especially this one on a track that was one of the flattest we've played on. "We've still got a lot to achieve in Mumbai. We can still equal the series and finish one-all. That's a great motivation for us. Disappointed with today's defeat, but that's the way cricket goes. If you don't play well enough you lose and you've got to accept that responsibility but still move on. You have no one else to blame. You got to look at the 16 players in the dressing room and say that we were just not good enough. We were outplayed by India who were a better team in this Test match. "It was a good toss to win for Dhoni the first day the wicket was going to be the flattest and it got slower and slower as the game progressed. If we probably had kept India down to about 450 in the first innings it would have been a chance for us to come back, but 600 runs on we were always chasing. Bad batting in our first innings put us into trouble." This freaking idiot seems to have made whining his profession instead of playing cricket - flat track? Dude, your team got rolled over under 300 runs in both innings and are set for a repeat performance in a few days! Fast bowlers created chances - then why the frack were you playing three spinners! He is getting in the :punter: league. Link to comment
DomainK Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 http://www.cricinfo.com/indvsl2009/content/current/story/436935.html This freaking idiot seems to have made whining his profession instead of playing cricket - flat track? Dude, your team got rolled over under 300 runs in both innings and are set for a repeat performance in a few days! Fast bowlers created chances - then why the frack were you playing three spinners! He is getting in the :punter: league. That is a question someone needs to ask Sanga. Out spinners and pacers were doing great. Link to comment
Celeste Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 Did he gave credit to India in presentation ceremony?? Link to comment
DomainK Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 Did he gave credit to India in presentation ceremony?? I think he said "Sreesanth" bowled really well. I don't remember him giving credit to India. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 He is going to give Pwnting some competetion............he has turned the whole team into whiners........seriously sanga is the biggest whiner thses days........ Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 He congradulated Sree because he is his kings XI team mate. Link to comment
Zap_Brannigan Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 Cry baba Sangakaara Link to comment
gult Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 Sanga has become really annoying. "With our fast bowlers we always created opportunities, the disappointing thing is we haven't really taken those chances twice in the first over in two Test matches, especially this one on a track that was one of the flattest we've played on." I thought Ahmedabad was flatter than this track! Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 I dont think he was moaning. Just bemoaning the fact his team did not take his chances which is fair enough. And he did give due credit tp us "We've still got a lot to achieve in Mumbai. We can still equal the series and finish one-all. That's a great motivation for us. Disappointed with today's defeat, but that's the way cricket goes. If you don't play well enough you lose and you've got to accept that responsibility but still move on. You have no one else to blame. You got to look at the 16 players in the dressing room and say that we were just not good enough. We were outplayed by India who were a better team in this Test match. Lets not copy the paks in their vitriol against sanga. This tour has had zero controversey and sanga has led the team with honour. He has not said anything at all out of order! Link to comment
gs Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 STFU Sanga! If you think this pitch was FLAT, just imagine what would have happened if it was "sporting" - SL shot out under 100 in each innings?!? Link to comment
Dark Warrior Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 These cry babies makes winning even more precious! Link to comment
Karan114 Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 These cry babies makes winning even more precious! Yep. Mahela was more sporting than this dude. Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 Only way Sanga would've gotten out in this test match was Edging onto the stumps. Which he did it twice :D Link to comment
kabira Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 More than whining. I think he is confused and gutted Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 For a man who is having too much pride, he is a wuss as a captain. If anyone he has to blame it has to be himself. His ultra defensive captaincy was one of the reason. Link to comment
The Dark Horse Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 They didnt held on to the chances. Thats why they lost. If it was flat, then it remained so even when they batted in the 1st innings. BTW @OP noone can match :punter: Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now