vvvslaxman Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 So far Yuvi - 3 Laxman -16 Aggy - 7 Aggy has beaten Yuvi lol
Karan114 Posted November 30, 2009 Author Posted November 30, 2009 So far Yuvi - 3 Laxman -16 Aggy - 7 Aggy has beaten Yuvi lol :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
SachDan Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 I think it's unfair of :emc: to have Karan's name as the thread starter. He seems to be one sensible poster whereas transparent goes to when test matches are on lol
Jersey #10 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 So far Yuvi - 3 Laxman -16 Aggy - 7 Aggy has beaten Yuvi lol That's a cause of ignorance! Which is why I can say that the poll flaws :giggle:
The Outsider Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 So far Yuvi - 3 Laxman -16 Aggy - 7 Aggy has beaten Yuvi lol Well, Aaag does have a test hundred outside the subcontinent.....:winky:
Karan114 Posted November 30, 2009 Author Posted November 30, 2009 I think it's unfair of :emc: to have Karan's name as the thread starter. He seems to be one sensible poster whereas transparent goes to when test matches are on lol Thanks SachDan...yep I was showing transparent how foolish his assertion was!
Guest Gunner Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 You also need reading lessons! http://indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=874607&postcount=46 are you saying that UV didn't win any matches for India? Irrelevant. You haven't answered my question yet.
The Outsider Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 So far Yuvi - 3 Laxman -16 Aggy - 7 Aggy has beaten Yuvi lol Sir Aggy's SR against Aus is 40.78. Yuvraj's is 34.59. Another point in TAV's favor! :adore:
The Outsider Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 not interested in playing around! UV vs Lax....:hmmm: Playing around? We'll get to that as soon as I can understand why you rate Waugh above Bevan?
Guest Hiten. Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 I will start deleting posts that malign Aggy :hitler: You wanna phuck with me ?
Jersey #10 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 So this is where it comes down to this is the total amount of runs Yuvi and Lax have made while playing in the same matches. 1522 - UV 1786 - Lax Lax leads by 264 runs after all the experience he has had while UV was new. UV has NO ZERO's in this telly and he did not bat in one of the matches. He has 3 100s. Lax has TWO ZERO's while He has 6 100s. Now can some one compare the two in ODIs?? Any takers?
Captain of Bhangra Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 Very random selection for a comparison. Both are class in different ways. Maybe when the careers of both are done, we can make a more accurate judgement...
Jersey #10 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 Irrelevant. You haven't answered my question yet. Your question is irrelevant in that case!
DomainK Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 Three people who voted for Yuvi: Aaku, transparent, ViruRulez
Jersey #10 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 ONE QUESTION TO ALL LAX FANS According to many of you Lax has so much technique, temperament etc right? According to you guys these things make a very good and PRODUCTIVE batsman then Why the hell is he kicked out of Odi and T20s? :dontknow: if tests are all that better and bigger than Odi's then a successful test player should also do good in Odis...or do these techniques count for nothing in Odis? I want an answer from each of the Lax supporters on this thread...Let's see, this should be fun can one justifiably answer this question? My claim is that having all this does not make a complete batsman ...you need combination of much more capabilities than just decent technique. If I am not wrong...LAX WAS ALSO KICKED OUT OF HIS IPL TEAM...WASN'T HE? ...:hmmm:
Jersey #10 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 Playing around? We'll get to that as soon as I can understand why you rate Waugh above Bevan? well then I will also start asking you random questions and never get to the point...and you will have to answer all of them before expecting me to answer any of yours..
graphic23 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 ONE QUESTION TO ALL LAX FANS According to many of you Lax has so much technique, temperament etc right? According to you guys these things make a very good and PRODUCTIVE batsman then Why the hell is he kicked out of Odi and T20s? :dontknow: if tests are all that better and bigger than Odi's then a successful test player should also do good in Odis...or do these techniques count for nothing in Odis? I want an answer from each of the Lax supporters on this thread...Let's see, this should be fun can one justifiably answer this question? My claim is that having all this does not make a complete batsman ...you need combination of much more capabilities than just decent technique. If I am not wrong...LAX WAS ALSO KICKED OUT OF HIS IPL TEAM...WASN'T HE? ...:hmmm: That he is a far superior batsman to Yuvraj is the reason why he can play knocks like these: http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64885.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64711.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64706.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65647.html and Yuvi, despite being used to the flat dead pitches around the world, cannot play knocks such as http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63920.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63867.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64062.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64060.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63952.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/291353.html It would help if you knew a little more history and a little more about both players rather than "Test match is slow, so its easier to play than ODIs." And yes, succeeding in a test match requires far superior batsmanship than an ODI or T20 does. And by your definition of "overall", Tendulkar is inferior to Yuvraj singh since he does not even play T20Is for India. So, I guess he's not as complete a batsman as Yuvraj Singh, right ?
The Outsider Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 well then I will also start asking you random questions and never get to the point...and you will have to answer all of them before expecting me to answer any of yours.. It's a very relevant question. Since you are considering Yuvraj to be a better overall player because of his superior ODI record, I want to understand why you consider Waugh superior to Bevan, when Bevan has a much better ODI record?
Jersey #10 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 That he is a far superior batsman to Yuvraj is the reason why he can play knocks like these: http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64885.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64711.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64706.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65647.html and Yuvi, despite being used to the flat dead pitches around the world, cannot play knocks such as http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63920.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63867.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64062.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64060.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63952.html http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/291353.html It would help if you knew a little more history and a little more about both players rather than "Test match is slow, so its easier to play than ODIs." And yes, succeeding in a test match requires far superior batsmanship than an ODI or T20 does. And by your definition of "overall", Tendulkar is inferior to Yuvraj singh since he does not even play T20Is for India. So, I guess he's not as complete a batsman as Yuvraj Singh, right ? again...I didn't count UV's two games against OZ because that was not enough to make inferential statements. Same goes here, Sachin has not played enough T20 to compare the two. BUT if you go back to all my posts... I have been carefully comparing UV's T20 vs Lax's Twenty20(IPL and other dumb matches) ..since t20 and twenty20 closely resemble. Look at Sachin's Twenty20 and UV's records...similarities are found...:two_thumbs_up: Yes, It would have helped If I had known a little more about history...I am a little sketchy on matches played before 97...I was like 8 years old back then.
Jersey #10 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 It's a very relevant question. Since you are considering Yuvraj to be a better overall player because of his superior ODI record' date=' I want to understand why you consider Waugh superior to Bevan, when Bevan has a much better ODI record?[/quote'] back to the RAMAYAN waugh succeeded in both Tests and Odi's compared to Bevan... Have I not been saying this for last 500 years? :wall:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now