varun Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 Number of ODIs seem to have reduced from 2 years ago with T20s becoming popular. Good or bad ? Discuss. +------+---------+ | year | numodis | +------+---------+ | 1971 | 1 | | 1972 | 3 | | 1973 | 5 | | 1974 | 6 | | 1975 | 19 | | 1976 | 6 | | 1977 | 6 | | 1978 | 10 | | 1979 | 27 | | 1980 | 22 | | 1981 | 28 | | 1982 | 33 | | 1983 | 66 | | 1984 | 52 | | 1985 | 65 | | 1986 | 63 | | 1987 | 75 | | 1988 | 64 | | 1989 | 56 | | 1990 | 62 | | 1991 | 39 | | 1992 | 89 | | 1993 | 84 | | 1994 | 101 | | 1995 | 61 | | 1996 | 130 | | 1997 | 118 | | 1998 | 111 | | 1999 | 156 | | 2000 | 133 | | 2001 | 121 | | 2002 | 147 | | 2003 | 151 | | 2004 | 139 | | 2005 | 111 | | 2006 | 175 | | 2007 | 197 | | 2008 | 138 | | 2009 | 153 | +------+---------+
The Outsider Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 Most teams tend to play more ODIs approaching the WC and then of course the WC year has a huge number of ODIs - some conclusion can possibly be drawn after the numbers from the next 2 years.
Chandan Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 Varun, Can we have number of ODIs played by India, Australia, SA and SL in each of last 5 years? That way we can deduce who has been playing the maximum number of ODIs. Tests, of course we know the numbers.
varun Posted December 7, 2009 Author Posted December 7, 2009 Varun, Can we have number of ODIs played by India, Australia, SA and SL in each of last 5 years? That way we can deduce who has been playing the maximum number of ODIs. Tests, of course we know the numbers. +--------------+------+---------+ | Team | Year | NumODIs | +--------------+------+---------+ | Australia | 2005 | 29 | | Australia | 2006 | 29 | | Australia | 2007 | 34 | | Australia | 2008 | 18 | | Australia | 2009 | 40 | | England | 2005 | 22 | | England | 2006 | 21 | | England | 2007 | 34 | | England | 2008 | 23 | | England | 2009 | 25 | | India | 2005 | 28 | | India | 2006 | 38 | | India | 2007 | 39 | | India | 2008 | 32 | | India | 2009 | 27 | | New Zealand | 2005 | 22 | | New Zealand | 2006 | 14 | | New Zealand | 2007 | 33 | | New Zealand | 2008 | 16 | | New Zealand | 2009 | 24 | | Pakistan | 2005 | 22 | | Pakistan | 2006 | 24 | | Pakistan | 2007 | 23 | | Pakistan | 2008 | 21 | | Pakistan | 2009 | 20 | | South Africa | 2005 | 25 | | South Africa | 2006 | 31 | | South Africa | 2007 | 30 | | South Africa | 2008 | 18 | | South Africa | 2009 | 20 | | Sri Lanka | 2005 | 19 | | Sri Lanka | 2006 | 43 | | Sri Lanka | 2007 | 29 | | Sri Lanka | 2008 | 28 | | Sri Lanka | 2009 | 22 | | West Indies | 2005 | 18 | | West Indies | 2006 | 35 | | West Indies | 2007 | 24 | | West Indies | 2008 | 20 | | West Indies | 2009 | 22 | +--------------+------+---------+
coffee_rules Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 2007 is huge because of the WC - boring one sided matches..what a sleepfest it was.
cowboysfan Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 2007 is huge because of the WC - boring one sided matches..what a sleepfest it was. expect another borefest in 2011.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now