Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical: Barely any one cared about tests in 80s ? That's according to VVVS Laxman as he claimed that the stadiums were empty. I was not alive in 80s to observe the situation back then...:two_thumbs_up:
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 You still didn't answer my question! As far as craze is concerned, do you think Tests are more popular than T20? Yea i think so. Tests are more popular. Test cricket is 120 plus years old. T20 is 3 or 4 years old. Let us see if T20 survives 120 years.
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 INdia no.1 in Tests Pakistan no.6 in Tests India no.2 in ODIs Pakistan no.?? in ODIs India no. ?? T20 Pakistan no. 1-3! Pakistan had their golden period in Odis and Tests way before we did...Look at the records. T20 rankings will soon come out and you will get to see that India is at number 8 along with Bangladesh and Pakistan is in top 3...I will feel disgusting when I see that list (talking about my self only here)
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 That's according to VVVS Laxman as he claimed that the stadiums were empty. I was not alive in 80s to observe the situation back then...:two_thumbs_up: We followed Tests through radio, TV. In the 90s i still remember how me and my friends stood all day watching a Test match through a window of our warden. Your theory is less crowd on the stadium means that format is poor. That is a BS theory. I just gave you an example.. a game cannot survive without being popular for this many years.
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Yea i think so. Tests are more popular. Test cricket is 120 plus years old. T20 is 3 or 4 years old. Let us see if T20 survives 120 years. But, but, but Umar Akmal is better than Tendulkar because he averages more after two tests and scored a century on debut.
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 India no. ?? T20 Pakistan no. 1-3! Pakistan had their golden period in Odis and Tests way before we did...Look at the records. T20 rankings will soon come out and you will get to see that India is at number 8 along with Bangladesh and Pakistan is in top 3...I will feel disgusting when I see that list (talking about my self only here) Don't care . India can be below Bangladesh no problem. :hysterical: As long as they are good in Tests that is fine.
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Yea i think so. Tests are more popular. Test cricket is 120 plus years old. T20 is 3 or 4 years old. Let us see if T20 survives 120 years. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: for real? Wake up Lax, so much for sense making...joke of the year:lol:
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 We followed Tests through radio' date=' TV. In the 90s i still remember how me and my friends stood all day watching a Test match through a window of our warden. Your theory is less crowd on the stadium means that format is poor. That is a BS theory. I just gave you an example.. a game cannot survive without being popular for this many years.[/quote'] But' date=' but, but Umar Akmal is better than Tendulkar because he averages more after two tests and scored a century on debut.[/quote'] Hey Outsider, I am talking about craze not quality here...you can't be that ignorant to say otherwise...
Karan114 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 turns out more people like to watch T20 over the 120 year old Tests.. And more people like to watch porn over 2 year old T20...what's your point?
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 for real? Wake up Lax, so much for sense making...joke of the year:lol: Tests are in coma right now and no one knows if it will survive another 10 years T20s have taken over the tests in just 2 years....turns out more people like to watch T20 over the 120 year old Tests.. So you agree Umar Akmal is better than Tendulkar?
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: for real? Wake up Lax, so much for sense making...joke of the year:lol: Tests are in coma right now and no one knows if it will survive another 10 years T20s have taken over the tests in just 2 years....turns out more people like to watch T20 over the 120 year old Tests.. Feel free to be delusional.
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 So you agree Umar Akmal is better than Tendulkar? read all my posts and especially the OP and my previous post. I have been talking about the CRAZE, not quality
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 And more people like to watch porn over 2 year old T20...what's your point? Craze for porn >>>>> Craze for T20.. Simple
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Firs Yuvi is better than Laxman. Now tihs :hysterical: Amazingly delusional. Only Pakis have such thinking.
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 read all my posts and especially the OP and my previous post. I have been talking about the CRAZE, not quality Aaah ok.... then I don't want to get involved. brb, after watching some CRAZY porn.
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Feel free to be delusional. I would not like to converse any more with you on this topic after reading that awesome post of yours :haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha: :two_thumbs_up:GOOD LUCK with your dream...wake up son :two_thumbs_up:
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 read all my posts and especially the OP and my previous post. I have been talking about the CRAZE, not quality So you like a format because there is more crowd. Wow.. Let me guess you watch lot of gayrukhan movies because he is popular he has "CRAZY" audiences :hysterical:
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Aaah ok.... then I don't want to get involved. brb' date=' after watching some CRAZY porn.[/quote'] Why don't you go watch a Test match instead? :dontknow:
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Just listening to some music - Reshamaiyya kicks Ustad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan's a.$s when it comes to CRAZINESS!
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 So you like a format because there is more crowd. Wow.. Let me guess you watch lot of gayrukhan movies because he is popular he has "CRAZY" audiences :hysterical: I love T20s! but that's just me... I never claimed that T20 is a better format for every one (though it is for me), All I am saying is that there is more popularity of T20 than Tests at the moment...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now