Media reaction around the world upon India claiming the Number 1 position in ICC Test ranking

[flamy]

This times paper is same paper were ATHERTON is lead cricket writer. They are leading the anti India cricket crusade. But problem is we keep winning:hysterical: The writer Wilde also write anti india piece a week ago. The jelously is fabulous to see. We have the money and the team. Suck it up!

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[flamy]

Incredible insights peekay :finger:

no trolling on PK. :mad: brb trolling on this article's comments page.

[Ram]

This has got to be THE most factually inaccurate, analytically impotent and horrendously biased cricketing article to appear in a long time.

[champ]

who cares .. we will be numberrrr oneeeeeeeee !!! :bhangra::bhangra:

[King Tendulkar]

This has got to be THE most factually inaccurate' date=' analytically impotent and horrendously biased cricketing article to appear in a long time.[/quote'] The responses they got totally slammed Wilde and his bias. It was so bad that they did not even publish it in the actual paper and only left it on their online section only. Worst cricket article possibly ever. He has clearly spent to much time *****ing about India with Atherton the lead cricket writer of the paper

[Sachinism]

The responses they got totally slammed Wilde and his bias. It was so bad that they did not even publish it in the actual paper and only left it on their online section only. Worst cricket article possibly ever. He has clearly spent to much time *****ing about India with Atherton the lead cricket writer of the paper

link me please

[King Tendulkar]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article6942221.ece

[King Tendulkar]

^ Read the online responses to the articvle by readers at the bottom. He has been raped and humiliated

[Ram]

The responses they got totally slammed Wilde and his bias. It was so bad that they did not even publish it in the actual paper and only left it on their online section only. Worst cricket article possibly ever. He has clearly spent to much time *****ing about India with Atherton the lead cricket writer of the paper

Who is the author of that article? I am shocked at the total incompetence of what he has come up with.

[EnterTheVoid]

Facts = Objective; Opinions = Subjective; I agree with the author. A ranking of No 1 doesn't mean India is No 1; Based on the rankings, one can argue Sri Lanka are the second best team but the results suggest otherwise.

[Sachinism]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article6942221.ece

:hatsoff:

[King Tendulkar]

Who is the author of that article? I am shocked at the total incompetence of what he has come up with.

Simon Wilde. Same paper Atherton writes for

[Karan114]

Facts = Objective; Opinions = Subjective; I agree with the author. A ranking of No 1 doesn't mean India is No 1; Based on the rankings, one can argue Sri Lanka are the second best team but the results suggest otherwise.

How about you tell us who you think is the no.1 then and give your reasoning?

[SachDan]

^ Simon Wilde. Here's his article when Sachin went past Lara's record last year http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article4969385.ece

[EnterTheVoid]

How about you tell us who you think is the no.1 then and give your reasoning?

What difference would my opinion make ?

[King Tendulkar]

The times(englands leading paper) is so bitter towards India. Look how they start there article reporting sehwags unbeliavable knock ------------------------------- Virender Sehwag proved yesterday, not for the first time, that when the pitch is fine, the bowling friendly and he is in the right mood, there is no more voracious scorer of runs than the India opening batsman. ------------------------------------------------------- They had to give demean the knock a little bit!

[Zap_Brannigan]

lendl should have never been #1 since he couldnt win on grass Edit : oops

[King Tendulkar]

lendl should have never been #1 since he couldnt win in clay

I bet we could win on clay!

[Karan114]

What difference would my opinion make ?

No one's opinion is making a difference...but if you are saying "A ranking of No 1 doesn't mean India is No 1" one would like to know who you think is no.1 and what makes them no.1

[Karan114]

The times(englands leading paper) is so bitter towards India. Look how they start there article reporting sehwags unbeliavable knock ------------------------------- Virender Sehwag proved yesterday, not for the first time, that when the pitch is fine, the bowling friendly and he is in the right mood, there is no more voracious scorer of runs than the India opening batsman. ------------------------------------------------------- They had to give demean the knock a little bit!

Hahaha...bitterness emanating from every line there...Murali's bowling "friendly" lol