azanian Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 No lets not give credit' date=' the bowling was barely bowlng anyway.[/quote'] The West Indian batsmen are struggling to score runs against a worse bowling attack of Zimbabwe
Serani Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 The West Indian batsmen are struggling to score runs against a worse bowling attack of Zimbabwe I think you are struggling to understand exactly the kind of bowling that was being delivered here...... NO run up, stand there, throw the ball as high as possible, ball lands half way down the pitch and sits up ready to be smashed for 6. Im fairly sure I would be able to score a century off that.
Dravid Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Not counted as 1st class, That innings and Partnership :fail:
Watson87 Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Shuvogupto doesn't sound like a Muslim name? what's his religion anyone Does Banglas discriminate hindu players like Pakis?
ensd2 Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Even Nehra would have score a hundred on this match...B->
Equinox Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Shuvogupto doesn't sound like a Muslim name? what's his religion anyone His full name is Shuvagoto Hom Das Chowdhury apparently. So I guess he is Hindu.
Watson87 Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 His full name is Shuvagoto Hom Das Chowdhury apparently. So I guess he is Hindu. I think he deserves an IPL contract then:--D
ensd2 Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 I think he deserves an IPL contract then:--D 1000000 dollars contract :hysterical::hysterical: Poor stuff from Eng .
Serani Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Its not poor stuff from Eng, Bangladesh should have declared but Ashraful is not used to his side batting so long and has probably never declared ever so kept going even though he should allow us to bat on.
ViruRulez Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 Another slogger is added in the Bangles infamous collection of blindfolded sloggers .. shame of England .. BTW is it gully cricket going on
Roshanrocks Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 so y didnt the english bowlers try to get the banglas out instead of bowling like that? :think:
vvvslaxman Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 so y didnt the english bowlers try to get the banglas out instead of bowling like that? :think: lol Good question :cantstop:
Guest DeveGowda Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 so y didnt the english bowlers try to get the banglas out instead of bowling like that? :think: What to think there....Only 2 sessions left and england oent want to bowl one more Session to get 5 wickets.....they wanted to bat 2 sessions...May be its arrangement between 2 teams..otherwise y bangla declared @ lunch when one guy @91 and the other @ 66..even he should have hit a century if played 15 more balls...!
Roshanrocks Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 tsk tsk.... everyone wants to bat, no body likes to bowl and field... just like in our gully cricket hehehehe
donkey Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 so y didnt the english bowlers try to get the banglas out instead of bowling like that? :think: Target wont be big enough to batting practice otherwise.
mastana Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 England wanted to win this match. Thats why they gave easy runs. So that they can declare their innings.
Warner>Everyone Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 England wanted to win this match. So they gave 189 runs away in 9 overs? thats a new tactic
Warner>Everyone Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 ummm....no. Its a fairly common tactic...its called 'forcing a declaration' im sorry i dont understand how conceding so many runs in such a short period can win you a match?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now