CG Posted June 28, 2010 Posted June 28, 2010 Are you trying to say that their achievements are actually not so good because they bully tail enders? Yes Sir,if you are a opening bowler and take more no 7,8,9,10,11 than 1,2,3 then it shows the potency compare with mcgrath ,wasim,ambrose,gillespie stats you see the difference
rabinjackman Posted June 28, 2010 Posted June 28, 2010 even takin wickets atail enders is not easy now a days
Serani Posted June 28, 2010 Posted June 28, 2010 Yes Sir' date='if you are a opening bowler and take more no 7,8,9,10,11 than 1,2,3 then it shows the potency compare with mcgrath ,wasim,ambrose,gillespie stats you see the difference[/quote'] You dont have an average in the low 20's without bullying tail enders. Im not looking at stats but I would guess those bowlers have also taken out a lot of tail enders. Also you cant really include a number 7 as tail, Matt prior is average 40 and bats at 7.
Lord Posted June 28, 2010 Posted June 28, 2010 You dont have an average in the low 20's without bullying tail enders. Im not looking at stats but I would guess those bowlers have also taken out a lot of tail enders. Also you cant really include a number 7 as tail' date=' Matt prior is average 40 and bats at 7.[/quote'] yes even Gilly batted at 7 all his life
Steyn Posted June 29, 2010 Posted June 29, 2010 Steyn should be considered as one of the all time best. He is imo better than Wasim, Waqar,McGrath, Pollok etc. No contemporary bowler comes near to Steyn's average and achievement. But there were a lot of ordinary bowlers who were having good success at the time of Ws, Mcgrath.
achilles Posted June 29, 2010 Posted June 29, 2010 Steyn should be considered as one of the all time best. He is imo better than Wasim, Waqar,McGrath, Pollok etc. No contemporary bowler comes near to Steyn's average and achievement. But there were a lot of ordinary bowlers who were having good success at the time of Ws, Mcgrath.
f.b.m Posted June 29, 2010 Posted June 29, 2010 The thing that is unique about him is his aggression. I dont know too many other bowlers except Waqar Younis with his class being as aggressive in a very raw sense as he is now. Most of them (McGrath, Walsh, Akram, etc) become 'masters of swing', 'metronomes', etc, etc. Steyn must be the bowler in that group who cares least about accuracy and is in essence, still a raw phast baller.
f.b.m Posted June 29, 2010 Posted June 29, 2010 Btw, I was a big fan of him ever since he took that 5 wicket haul in Sri Lanka back in 3567 BC. Never thought that he would become as good as this!
Hur Rizvi Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 Guys like steyn and waqar have great averages and strike rates and the reason is their bowling to tailenders.Our indian Fast bowlers have most toporders wickets in there careers and spinners most tailender wickets. Steyn-http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/47492.html?batting_positionmin1=8;batting_positionval1=batting_position;class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=default;template=results;type=bowling;view=dismissal_summary Almost HALF 94 wickets of 204 are of 7-11 this shows why his strike rate and averages are so low Bus karo duffer indian nation has never produced Guys like waqar bhai and steyn.... They produce 80-85mph trundlers Waqar is one of the greatest fast bowlers and u r comparing him wid crappy indian bowlers.. WTF Give the credit where it is due Waqar is great and steyn will be a great too .... Both are great bowlers
Lord Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 Bus karo duffer indian nation has never produced Guys like waqar bhai and steyn.... They produce 80-85mph trundlers Waqar is one of the greatest fast bowlers and u r comparing him wid crappy indian bowlers.. WTF Give the credit where it is due Waqar is great and steyn will be a great too .... Both are great bowlers but hes never won a world cup
Hur Rizvi Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 but hes never won a world cup This is a lame excuse Aaqib javed has won us world cup so has Umar gul , sohail tanvir ...That doesnt take them close to waqar rubbish argument ...
Lord Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 This is a lame excuse Aaqib javed has won us world cup so has Umar gul ' date=' sohail tanvir ...That doesnt take them close to waqar rubbish argument ...[/quote'] cool down,i was just giving the same argument that Sachin haters use to pull him down.look how lame it is
Hur Rizvi Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 cool down' date='i was just giving the same argument that Sachin haters use to pull him down.look how lame it is[/quote'] Sachin is a great and world cup winning argument is Rubbish whether it is for sachin or waqar
Serani Posted July 1, 2010 Posted July 1, 2010 The thing that is unique about him is his aggression. I dont know too many other bowlers except Waqar Younis with his class being as aggressive in a very raw sense as he is now. Most of them (McGrath' date=' Walsh, Akram, etc) become 'masters of swing', 'metronomes', etc, etc. Steyn must be the bowler in that group who cares least about accuracy and is in essence, still a raw phast baller.[/quote'] Roach will be better than Steyn :pray:
SachDan Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 248 wickets at a SR of 39.4 :hail: http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=bowling_strike_rate;qualmax1=800;qualmin1=200;qualval1=wickets;template=results;type=bowling
bulbul Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Roach will be better than Steyn :pray: coc-roach ?
f.b.m Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Roach will be better than Steyn :pray: I dont think Roach will be very successful tbh. I'm not saying this based on hindsight or saying that he doesnt have the raw ingredients but he is one of those bowlers who doesnt get a truckload of wickets when hes bowling well (a bit like Flintoff) and doesnt get any fluke wickets like Mitchell Jonhson when he's bowling badly. (wicketability if thats a word) Roach bowls mainly from wide of the crease, moves the ball in rather than away and doesn't bowl a fullish length too often. All of these things mean that he isnt going to take too many wickets even when looking good and bowling well imo. Edit: I'll stick my neck out and say that Darren Sammy will have better numbers on the longer run than Roach.
Trichromatic Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Mat Player Country Wickets Avg Year 40 Waqar Younis Pakistan 211 20.87 1996 41 Waqar Younis Pakistan 216 21.08 1996 42 Waqar Younis Pakistan 217 21.67 1996 43 Waqar Younis Pakistan 222 21.49 1996 44 Lillee, D K Australia 229 23.30 1980 45 Steyn, D W * South Africa 232 23.08 2010 46 Steyn, D W * South Africa 238 22.99 2011 47 Steyn, D W * South Africa 244 22.75 2011 48 Lillee, D K Australia 251 23.37 1981 49 Lillee, D K Australia 259 22.96 1981 50 Lillee, D K Australia 262 23.40 1981 51 Lillee, D K Australia 269 23.32 1981 52 Lillee, D K Australia 273 23.39 1981 53 Lillee, D K Australia 279 23.57 1981 54 Lillee, D K Australia 290 23.23 1981 55 Lillee, D K Australia 296 23.08 1981 2 wickets needed for fastest 250 wickets and 4 more to become highest wickets after 48 matches. Such record after playing in all conditions and performing all teams. Best SR
Chandan Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Can you please post fastest to 250 till now? Want to see where Marshall. Holding, Botham, Hadlee etc stand? And do post fastest to 300 as well so that we can track Steyn with some interest.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now