Jump to content

We can be the world’s best side: Akhtar


mastana

Recommended Posts

Posted

If this is what passes for confidence in padosi land, they have quite a bit to learn. Confidence is " We can be the worlds best side" "We are the worlds best side " when you actually are is very close to arrogance. "We are the worlds best side" when you are nowhere near the top 3 teams is deseparate delusion. It is easy to say, "I bowl better than akthar/asif" see how much confidence I have....

Posted
oh com'on man who asked him to say that he believes... "you know", we know, whole world knows that they have all the solid proves, video proves to be precisely... Just put everything in front of players and ban them forever or whatever they want to punish, then if players want to defend, they might continue appealing forever, seriously its more than enough time now and I personally feel now ICC want only to "fire" by putting "bandooq" on PCB shoulders... p.s. comparing it with kasab was too funny...
Hmm... so you want the ICC to take action quickly without following due process.. so that the players can again get off on technicality when they reappeal the case and argue that due process was not followed?? Isn't that what happened in Akhtar/Asif drug case? PCB handled the matter in the most unprofessional manner and then the duo got off on some technicality? And you still don't want to learn? Seriously Padosis are funny bunch. I am permanently indebted to them. Actually, its not just me but every human being on earth should be indebted to them. They provide the best entertainment (most of it off the field)...
Posted
That all you mentioned is not what I am talking about' date=' that all is going about the suspension of the players only... My point is; video proves are there, everything is real, players caught red handed, you have all the proves you are required then why ICC taking this long, what is that suspension for, why notices, negotiations, interviews, meetings etc etc... You have all the proves so straight away ban them for life or whatever punishment you want to give, why to make everything so complicated and why such a long delay, is that ICC handling the case or it is Pakistani police?[/quote'] Can I ask you a question, When Indian board can suspend its match fixing players with out any verdict from courts why cant Pakistan Board do the same the moment Indians knew Azaruddin and Jadeja were involved in Shady things, they never played for India again and That mess is not an issue for Indian Players anymore why cant Pakistan and its fans do the same instead of coming up with ridiculous consipiracy theories. Your great Former Captain Imran Khan had even nerve to say spot fixing should not given life ban, what kind of an Idiot would say that, spot will lead match fixing then what will you do. What is this nonsense coming from Pakistan , it is up to ICC to prove that players are guilty not it is not up to ICC only , it is PCB's job also to make sure their players dont do match fixing. Your PCB and your media and some fans are pathetic will blame anybody but themselves for all the mess they create and think it is up to other nations to clean their mess.We will shout louder and harder and everything will go away and by the way we will blame India for everything. What kind of logic is well Indian mafia runs the match fixing so it is India's fault, why cant your fricking players be clean and dont sell their country for money
Posted
Can I ask you a question, When Indian board can suspend its match fixing players with out any verdict from courts why cant Pakistan Board do, the moment Indians knew Azaruddin and Jadeja were involved in Shady things, they never played for India again and That mess is not an issue for Indian Players anymore why cant Pakistan and its fans do the same instead of coming up with ridiculous consipiracy theories. Your great Former Captain Imran Khan had even nerve to say spot fixing should not given life ban, what kind of an Idiot would say that, spot will lead match fixing then what will you do. What is this nonsense coming from Pakistan , it is up to ICC to prove that players are guilty not it is not up to ICC only , it is PCB's job also to make sure their players dont do match fixing. Your PCB and your media and some fans are pathetic will blame anybody but themselves for all the mess they create and think it is up to other nations to clean their mess.We will shout louder and harder and everything will go away and by the way we will blame India for everything. What kind of logic is well Indian mafia runs the match fixing so it is India's fault, why cant your fricking players be clean and dont sell their country for money
Don't forget the famous quote, "why not legalize ball tampering"... :--D Just because it happens in their society all the time means it has to be legalized everywhere else too?
Posted
Can I ask you a question, When Indian board can suspend its match fixing players with out any verdict from courts why cant Pakistan Board do the same the moment Indians knew Azaruddin and Jadeja were involved in Shady things, they never played for India again and That mess is not an issue for Indian Players anymore why cant Pakistan and its fans do the same instead of coming up with ridiculous consipiracy theories. Your great Former Captain Imran Khan had even nerve to say spot fixing should not given life ban, what kind of an Idiot would say that, spot will lead match fixing then what will you do. What is this nonsense coming from Pakistan , it is up to ICC to prove that players are guilty not it is not up to ICC only , it is PCB's job also to make sure their players dont do match fixing. Your PCB and your media and some fans are pathetic will blame anybody but themselves for all the mess they create and think it is up to other nations to clean their mess.We will shout louder and harder and everything will go away and by the way we will blame India for everything. What kind of logic is well Indian mafia runs the match fixing so it is India's fault, why cant your fricking players be clean and dont sell their country for money
As for as this fixing event is concerned, it all happened inside Eng, reported by English media, enquired by Eng police, so called handled by ICC... How can PCB interfere? Don’t get emotional and talk realistically please... Do you feel PCB should go there and say, OK please stop everybody, we know our players did this match fixing and we put life ban on them... Do you realistically see it is possible to do for PCB in this particular event? And I do hope BCCI have made a complete and genuine enquiry on all IPL match fixing reports wich says involvement of 26 players... Also its nice that you know about Azaruddin and Jadeja... But its not fair that you ONLY know about Azaruddin and Jadeja and don’t have any clue about Salim Malik and Ata ur Rehman...
Posted
As for as this fixing event is concerned, it all happened inside Eng, reported by English media, enquired by Eng police, so called handled by ICC... How can PCB interfere? Don’t get emotional and talk realistically please... Do you feel PCB should go there and say, OK please stop everybody, we know our players did this match fixing and we put life ban on them... Do you realistically see it is possible to do for PCB in this particular event? And I do hope BCCI have made a complete and genuine enquiry on all IPL match fixing reports wich says involvement of 26 players... Also its nice that you know about Azaruddin and Jadeja... But its not fair that you ONLY know about Azaruddin and Jadeja and don’t have any clue about Salim Malik and Ata ur Rehman...
PCB can do everything it can co-operate with ICC instead of throwing mud back onto English Players.It can stop picking drug cheaters from being in the team.And ask your damn players not to sell their country . Salim Malik was not playing for pakistan since 1999 and Ata ur Rehman was joke he stopped playing in 1994 so when they were banned it was done as eye wash. So dont tell me about that justice who himself admitted Wasim Akram should have been banned but he was lenient on him if your justice himself is like that what else can anyone say. so dont compare it to India and dont tell me about IPL come with some valid news then we will talk.
Posted
PCB can do everything it can co-operate with ICC instead of throwing mud back onto English Players.It can stop picking drug cheaters from being in the team.And ask your damn players not to sell their country . Salim Malik was not playing for pakistan since 1999 and Ata ur Rehman was joke he stopped playing in 1994 so when they were banned it was done as eye wash. So dont tell me about that justice who himself admitted Wasim Akram should have been banned but he was lenient on him if your justice himself is like that what else can anyone say. so dont compare it to India and dont tell me about IPL come with some valid news hen we will talk.
Don't forget when they PCB thrown mmud back on English player... After the ODI which Pakistan WON and ICC called for enquiry and throwing mud "back" was the best possible reaction on that particular event because it was mud thrown by ICC first, and now what the **** they got out of that ODI... they were having "solid" proves for that match as well, why then it has been declared as "clean" match? "justice who himself admitted Wasim Akram should have been banned", Any source?
Posted
"justice who himself admitted Wasim Akram should have been banned"' date=' Any source?[/quote'] http://www.cricinfo.com/pakvind/content/story/232548.html
In his report submitted in 2000, Justice Qayyum - now retired - had fined Akram and recommended he never be allowed to captain Pakistan again. To quote his verdict: "This commission feels that all is not well here and that Wasim Akram is not above board. He has not co-operated with this Commission. It is only by giving Wasim Akram the benefit of the doubt after Ata-ur-Rehman changed his testimony in suspicious circumstances that he has not been found guilty of match-fixing. He cannot be said to be above suspicion." But over five years after the report was finally released, and more than seven years after the inquiry began, Justice Qayyum told Cricinfo that he hadn't wanted a "great player" like Wasim to be banned, especially towards the end of his career. "For Wasim I had some soft corner for him. He was a very great player, a very great bowler and I was his fan, and therefore that thing did weigh with me. Two things - one, I didn't want that the cricket should be deprived of his participation, and the other was that I didn't want that towards the end of his career... he should be banned or something like that. My idea was not to find people guilty and then punish them. It was more of a case where I had to do something to put an end to the practice in future. What had happened had happened. You couldn't turn the clock back but you had to make sure they wouldn't repeat what they were doing." When asked whether any other player had been let off lightly, he replied, "The quantum of punishment is more of one's subjective decision, and I was lenient towards one or two of them."
he basically let off akram
Posted
http://www.cricinfo.com/pakvind/content/story/232548.html But over five years after the report was finally released, and more than seven years after the inquiry began, Justice Qayyum told Cricinfo that he hadn't wanted a "great player" like Wasim to be banned, especially towards the end of his career. "For Wasim I had some soft corner for him. He was a very great player, a very great bowler and I was his fan, and therefore that thing did weigh with me. Two things - one, I didn't want that the cricket should be deprived of his participation, and the other was that I didn't want that towards the end of his career... he should be banned or something like that. My idea was not to find people guilty and then punish them. It was more of a case where I had to do something to put an end to the practice in future. What had happened had happened. You couldn't turn the clock back but you had to make sure they wouldn't repeat what they were doing." he basically let off akram
This attitude is even more appalling. So if a Judge has this kind of attitude, no wonder every other padosi isn't trying to match fix. Be somebody important... and then do whatever you want, you will get away with murder. The due diligence of banning Akram (and others involved) would have stopped the practice.
Posted
Though its a shame for himself he said thing after a long time of his own report but now I dont know how should I tell what sort of personality and mentality Qayyum himself had :((
Asim, I am shocked at the fact that you did not know Akram was let go by your judge, when the whole world knew about it long ago.
Posted
Asim' date=' I am shocked at the fact that you did not know Akram was let go by your judge, when the whole world knew about it long ago.[/quote'] At first I was also shocked how I missed this news but got it why, may be because in all recent past I simply avoided to read or hear anything written or spoken by Qayyum because of his total psycho personality, never took any of his talk seriously (and btw way its not cz of his cricket report, till that time I was not properly familiar with his "personality", got familiar with his personality in Musharraf regime because of other political issues, and to me he is nothing more than a joker)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...