Facts based debate: Bradman's superiority questioned - Parameter 3

Nirvanam · November 12, 2010

No. What "science" does is have half-baked knowledge contender masquerading as "experts" and spitting out gems like this. Quality Index in Bradman's time was 1.73. Take Anti-Log of quality indexes (on the base of 10) Antilog (1.73) = 54 Antilog (2.23) = 170 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: I never thought growing up I would see a day where Bradman and anti-log would be mentioned in the same sentence. I suppose we have to thanks ourselves (Indians) for making a great sport nothing more than the ability to query CI database and invoke algorithms and statistical idioms to further our sweet ego. xxxx

And because a mathematical expression gives results that you don't agree with, then automatically its opposite is true because you believe science gives half baked interpretations? Seriously? As asked before, give me one good reason why Bradman >> peers necessarily means Bradman > future/past batsmen. Attempt it at least.

Raghav_12 · November 12, 2010

Ah ha the jealous mathmatician forgot to use the correct QI (inclusive of Bradman) of 2.3 for 28-48 :--D Antilog of 2.3 is 200, which means that Sachin would avg 48 in Bradman's time (based on your logic) :giggle: What was even more hilarious is how you ran away from that thread at the prospect of having to do the antilog of 2.3 :P

Whole discussion is there for anybody to see,. http://www.indiancricketfans.com/sho...&postcount=487 You had corrected data yourself and then we had come to common conclusion that Sachin is just greater than Bradman.

zen · November 12, 2010

Whole discussion is there for anybody to see,. http://www.indiancricketfans.com/sho...&postcount=487 You had corrected data yourself and then we had come to common conclusion that Sachin is just greater than Bradman.

You haven't even answered this http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1216617&postcount=514 :hysterical: That antilog sinks the boat of scientific analysis :P

Raghav_12 · November 12, 2010

No. What "science" does is have half-baked knowledge contender masquerading as "experts" and spitting out gems like this. Quality Index in Bradman's time was 1.73. Take Anti-Log of quality indexes (on the base of 10) Antilog (1.73) = 54 Antilog (2.23) = 170 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: I never thought growing up I would see a day where Bradman and anti-log would be mentioned in the same sentence. I suppose we have to thanks ourselves (Indians) for making a great sport nothing more than the ability to query CI database and invoke algorithms and statistical idioms to further our sweet ego. xxxx

That methodology was only for Rett, not for any serious poster over here.

Lurker · November 12, 2010

And because a mathematical expression gives results that you don't agree with, then automatically its opposite is true because you believe science gives half baked interpretations? Seriously?

Did I mention the word result anywhere??? Quit insinuating ideas that have not been comprehended yet in my mind. Let me rephrase - It is retarded to use Mathematical expression, like anti-log, in cricket. Simple as that. You dont like it fair enough and all that. As for your assertion about Bradman scoring over his peers, I mentioned in my very first post that forget about comparisons with Bradman, no way SRT scores over Sunny. And I have seen them both at their best. You are of course free to have your own opinion on that one. xxx

zen · November 12, 2010

That methodology was only for Rett' date=' not for any serious poster over here.[/quote'] But you said you were "darn serious" when you were doing that calculations. After being proved to be dumb, I like the way you changed your tune :giggle:

Raghav_12 · November 12, 2010

But you said you were "darn serious" when you were doing that calculations. After being proved to be dumb' date=' I like the way you changed your tune :giggle:[/quote'] http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1221903&postcount=17 I really don't want to engage in a discussion with a person so dumb that he seriously thinks that anti-log can be used to compare quality of Bradman and Sachin. Top of that you fail to pick joke even after three days.

Nirvanam · November 12, 2010

Did I mention the word result anywhere??? Quit insinuating ideas that have not been comprehended yet in my mind. Let me rephrase - It is retarded to use Mathematical expression, like anti-log, in cricket. Simple as that. You dont like it fair enough and all that. As for your assertion about Bradman scoring over his peers, I mentioned in my very first post that forget about comparisons with Bradman, no way SRT scores over Sunny. And I have seen them both at their best. You are of course free to have your own opinion on that one. xxx

Fair!

zen · November 13, 2010

http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1221903&postcount=17 I really don't want to engage in a discussion with a person so dumb that he seriously thinks that anti-log can be used to compare quality of Bradman and Sachin. Top of that you fail to pick joke even after three days.

Oh boy, the the comedy continues! :dance:

Now he thinks I thought that antilog could work, when I don't even know much about them :giggle:

zen · November 13, 2010

It is easy to see why Sachin fanatics have such a bad reputation (esp on neutral forums). First they try to act smart when they are not, when they get laughed at they complain, then like a gambler who lost big they up their stakes but still get laughed at, so finally they say start abusing :hysterical:

The Outsider · November 13, 2010

WTF is this sophistry!! Looks like the American Sophists Association has found a new member in Nir! :laugh: Here is a suggestion- let's see if the sophists can get this junk published in a peer reviewed journal. There are numerous papers in scientific journals on the greatness of Bradman. Let's see if these hacks can get even one paper published, since they are lecturing about science and logic here. Too bad the days of paper submissions are pretty much over, otherwise they would have been pasting scanned copies of their coffee stained (spilt by the laughter of their referree) here pretty soon.

nballa · November 13, 2010

i already questioned his superiority since i got to know who he was.

EnterTheVoid · November 13, 2010

i already questioned his superiority since i got to know who he was.

:hysterical:

November 13, 2010