vaibhav_delhi Posted December 4, 2010 Author Posted December 4, 2010 lol...sach god worshipers have gone bonkers
Jersey #10 Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 Dhoni saved his place in the team by letting Sachin score that 200. If Sachin had not been able to make that 200 in that game because of Dhoni, Dhoni would have been fired before the post match presentation.
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 4, 2010 Author Posted December 4, 2010 Selectors are Puppets' date=' They include Jadeja only for Dhoni.[/quote'] why does gamby take him into XI?
Jersey #10 Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 why does gamby take him into XI? Sachin probably told him to
Andy Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 why does gamby take him into XI? What else, Dhoni is the 'Permanent' Captain. Gambo is just making the Numbers.:dontknow:
Andy Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 Dhoni saved his place in the team by letting Sachin score that 200. If Sachin had not been able to make that 200 in that game because of Dhoni' date=' Dhoni would have been fired before the post match presentation.[/quote'] :dito:
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 4, 2010 Author Posted December 4, 2010 What else' date=' Dhoni is the 'Permanent' Captain. Gambo is just making the Numbers.:dontknow:[/quote'] you mean dhoni called him to get jaadu in the XI...like i said...the worshipers have gone bonkers...
Jersey #10 Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 no point arguing with a delusional person. so I'd say I believe you.:giggle: You are ignoring the reality m8. There is no such thing as "selectors". It's only Sachin and then a few puppets who are there to sign papers.
Andy Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 you mean dhoni called him to get jaadu in the XI...like i said...the worshipers have gone bonkers... Dhoni Laver you have gone Mad.
zen Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 This is a comedy thread! .... First the topic starter tried to prove that Ten>Bradman based on some dumb poll in Sydney Herald, went on to suggest that a few comments here and there by some ex-cricketers indicates what he wants to show, the cheery in the cake was when he tried to show that batting avg don't mean much by comparing guys with more or less similar batting avg! And now this poll God, what's happening to ICF. We had one guy who was hell bent on debating based on parameters, another one came out with antilog and now this one is focused on poll results. I hope all these three are not the same :giggle:
Jersey #10 Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 This is a comedy thread! .... First the topic starter tried to prove that Ten>Bradman based on some dumb poll in Sydney Herald, went on to suggest that a few comments here and there by some ex-cricketers indicates what he wants to show, the cheery in the cake was when he tried to show that batting avg don't mean much by comparing guys with more or less similar batting avg! And now this poll God, what's happening to ICF. We had one guy who was hell bent on debating based on parameters, another one came out with antilog and now this one is focused on poll results. I hope all these three are not the same guys :giggle: @bold - That's exactly what's happening
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 4, 2010 Author Posted December 4, 2010 This is a comedy thread! .... First the topic starter tried to prove that Ten>Bradman based on some dumb poll in Sydney Herald, went on to suggest that a few comments here and there by some ex-cricketers indicates what he wants to show, the cheery in the cake was when he tried to show that batting avg don't mean much by comparing guys with more or less similar batting avg! And now this poll God, what's happening to ICF. We had one guy who was hell bent on debating based on parameters, another one came out with antilog and now this one is focused on poll results. I hope all these three are not the same :giggle: what are you doing here oily rat...worshipers are gonna rip into you...
Jersey #10 Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 what are you doing here oily rat...worshipers are gonna rip into you... How many percent of people think that worshipers are going to rip into him? Please bring forward some poll results to prove your point.
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 4, 2010 Author Posted December 4, 2010 Gambhir Sachin Sehwag to bat in middle order thats a first. See we are getting all different opnions on the table.:giggle:
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 4, 2010 Author Posted December 4, 2010 This is a comedy thread! .... First the topic starter tried to prove that Ten>Bradman based on some dumb poll in Sydney Herald, went on to suggest that a few comments here and there by some ex-cricketers indicates what he wants to show, the cheery in the cake was when he tried to show that batting avg don't mean much by comparing guys with more or less similar batting avg! And now this poll God, what's happening to ICF. We had one guy who was hell bent on debating based on parameters, another one came out with antilog and now this one is focused on poll results. I hope all these three are not the same :giggle: btw you didn't answer rat. why is jayawardene n samaravera's name never mentioned in the same breath as lara's despite averaging more than lara?
spectre Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 Are you a filtered moron You created a thread and a poll asking for opinions. People are going to post theirs, whether you like it or not. thats a first. See we are getting all different opnions on the table.:giggle:
Andy Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 Are you a filtered moron You created a thread and a poll asking for opinions. People are going to post theirs, whether you like it or not. He is a Dhoni Worshipper.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now