kabira Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 well no one argues that...but right now he seems liability...but I expect him to score a hundred in Sydney and live another day like he always does
The Outsider Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 Ganguly is better than Colly' date=' but people talk about Colly like he is a total mongole batsman when his record is decent like Gangulys. Thats the point im trying to make.[/quote'] In the context of this thread it's pretty clear that 'people' are saying that Collingwood in the XI and Morgan as first choice replacement is indicator of very mediocre bench strength. Do you agree or not?
Serani Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 In the context of this thread it's pretty clear that 'people' are saying that Collingwood in the XI and Morgan as first choice replacement is indicator of very mediocre bench strength. Do you agree or not? Not really, he averaged over 40, thats good enough for me. There are plenty of players around county cricket better than Morgan too.
Andy Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 Bowling wise England of course, Batting - India.
vvvslaxman Posted December 29, 2010 Author Posted December 29, 2010 After bumbling with absolute crappy bowlers like Amjad Khan, Pattinson, Sajid Mahmood, Kabir Ali finally they have found decent line up. Moral is England should stay away from Pakistan origin bowlers. . Find some "Indian talent " like Amla or SA talent . :--D Now Aussies are going to try their hand at Pakistan "taulent" to burn their hands.
VRV Singh Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 For seam bowling it's England by a distance. As for spin I think India have quite a few who could do a job nearly as well as the primary spinner (this is not to say Harbhajan > Swann) whereas England aren't especially deep - though if Monty's renaissance is to be believed they may have a case here too. The Aussies have the poorest depth of spin in intl cricket :hahaha: Batting it is India, I believe
Watson87 Posted December 29, 2010 Posted December 29, 2010 Without Laxman and Zaheer Khan, India can even be beaten by the Kiwis. Raina, Pujara, Unadkat are backups is just funny. Kohli should come in Without Steyn, South Africa is plain. (agree with vvslaxman) Pakistan is a minnow, no one cares. most players are druggies, spot fixing scumbags or infected with genital warts but still the padosi forum have a thread on genital warts legend.:cantstop: West Indian players should stop playing cricket and concentrate on rapping. I think England has the best back up players. Broad got injured in comes Tremlet and did a fine job, Finn having a bad patch in comes Bresnan and was excellent, Collingwood going through a patch should be replaced by Morgan. England has the potential to be number 1 in the future, as their bowlers and upcoming batters look bring. Australia is going to be one of the weakest teams in world cricket, a very sad story. NZ their playing 11 are all playing like ravindra jadeja, i wonder what their back ups are like
spectre Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Batting - Easily India Bowling - SL, they seem to produce lot of quality newcomers from their small infrastructure.
Silva Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 I haven't seen mukund or rahane play. I like the looks of sharma vijay and kohli. india seems to have the most batting depth.
spectre Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Isnt the thread about bench strength and not current lineups. I don't see any bench strength for england. SL for bowling? Are you mad.
girishk14 Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Batting: India Pace: Pak, England Spin: SL
girishk14 Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 I agree the Indian bench flopped miserably against Zimb and SL, but they have imrpoved since then. Im sure an Indian XI consisting of no players from the WC squad itself can beat top teams. (at least batting-wise)
Serani Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Isnt the thread about bench strength and not current lineups. I don't see any bench strength for england. the current line up is the bench :giggle:
spectre Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 the current line up is the bench :giggle: who else you have lined up in your bowling department and what are their credentials. Any half decent spinner apart from Swann
Serani Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 who else you have lined up in your bowling department and what are their credentials. Any half decent spinner apart from Swann Anderson Broad Finn Tremlett Bresnan Shahzad Monty No team has a squad of bowlers that good. End of story.
spectre Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 If this is the bench strength, who are the main bowlers, only Swann :dontknow: The last 4 wont get into the benches of the other top team seriously, monty :hysterical: Anderson Broad Finn Tremlett Bresnan Shahzad Monty No team has a squad of bowlers that good. End of story.
Serani Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Its a squad of bowlers, when one gets injured like Broad a Tremlett can come in. When ones off form like Finn then a Bresnan can come in. Thats called bench strength. Lets look at who India brought in when Zaheer was injured....whats his name again? Some malnourished kid who is a club bowler anway. Tremlett and Bresnan would walk into the India team let alone get on the "bench"
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now