Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 The kid can't wait for my numbers :giggle: So what do you plan to do with the numbers I give? My goal was to see whether anyone can come close. What's yours? To see that whether I come close :hysterical: Common man's translation: I have no effin idea what I am talking about. I am not going to give you anything because I have finally realized it’s a stupid question. Thanks, that’s all I wanted to know. :nice:
Raghav_12 Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 The kid can't wait for my numbers :giggle: So what do you plan to do with the numbers I give? My goal was to see whether anyone can come close. What's yours? To see that whether I come close :hysterical: Frankly speaking for somebody who took more than 12 hours to find out Anti-Log of 2.3 and kept egging me on to provide that "difficult" piece of information, your claim of doing these statistical calculations is very courageous move :-) http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1216605&postcount=512 (Quite an interesting discussion on this page) Good luck with your efforts..
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 Frankly speaking for somebody who took more than 12 hours to find out Anti-Log of 2.3 and kept egging me on to provide that "difficult" piece of information, your claim of doing these statistical calculations is very courageous move :-) http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1216605&postcount=512 (Quite an interesting discussion on this page) Good luck with your efforts.. I will do the calculations, only thing is I don't claim that they would be spot on :hysterical:
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 Common man's translation: I have no effin idea what I am talking about. I am not going to give you anything because I have finally realized it’s a stupid question. Thanks, that’s all I wanted to know. :nice: if something is stupid, you don't have to try so hard to prove it :giggle:
Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 I have to say, The dude-who-addresses-himself-in-the-third-person never fails to entertain me.
Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 I will do the calculations' date=' only thing is I don't claim that they would be spot on :hysterical:[/quote'] The guy keeps saying he will do the ‘calculations’, but so far, he hasn’t shown a SINGLE digit, not even for symbolic purposes.. Not even ONE. :hysterical:
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 Since no one offered to take the challenge, I will make that effort :P
Jersey #10 Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 This thread is a "BLOCKBUSTER HIT". Please someone do the honors and sticky it. We have got two pages in just denial. This thread has the caliber of making it very big.
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 The guy keeps saying he will do the ‘calculations’' date=' but so far, he hasn’t shown a SINGLE digit, not even for symbolic purposes.. Not even ONE. :hysterical:[/quote'] Appears as if someone thought I will do then NOW :hysterical:
Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 Appears as if someone thought I will do then NOW :hysterical: A’right, lets hear a deadline. What time will you have the ‘calculations’ ready?
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 A’right' date=' lets hear a deadline. What time will you have the ‘calculations’ ready? [/quote'] Before one of the three games, I talked about in the OP :icflove: Are you planning on betting based on my numbers?
Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 Since no one offered to take the challenge' date=' I will make that effort :P[/quote'] There goes your weekend! I pity you. You’re going to spend hour upon hour, digging up random, disconnected numbers from cricinfo and try to compile them, only to find in the end that they don’t make any sense whatsoever.
Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 Before one of the three games, I talked about in the OP :icflove: Are you planning on betting based on my numbers? No, I do however, plan on getting a great laugh outta them. Hence the eagerness for the deadline. :icflove:
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 There goes your weekend! I pity you. You’re going to spend hour upon hour' date=' digging up random, disconnected numbers from cricinfo and [b']try to compile them, only to find in the end that they don’t make any sense whatsoever. I didn't claim that they would in the first place :giggle:
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 No' date=' I do however, plan on getting a great laugh outta them. Hence the eagerness for the deadline. :icflove:[/quote'] This is hilarious, so you are thinking that I would post the numbers thinking that they would be accurate and then you would laugh because they won't, great :hysterical: This is adding more exitement to this thread :P
Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 ^ that make no sense whatsoever. *Marks Calendar to recheck this thread before deadline*.
vipin Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 You can never predict the exact outcome of such a match based on these statistics. What you can instead do is, find the probability of a particular outcome OR find the most probable outcome (The peak of the probability density curve).
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 ^ that make no sense whatsoever. *Marks Calendar to recheck this thread before deadline*. *Rett marks his calender as well in anticipation of someone waiting to laugh at some piece of stats as if they were suppose to make sense in the first place. How hilarious would that be*
Ram Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 *Rett marks his calender as well in anticipation of someone waiting to laugh at some piece of stats as if they were suppose to make sense in the first place. How hilarious would that be* I love how you’re desperately trying to buy an insurance cover, to prevent people from laughing at the numbers you’re going to post, by pretending that It would be hilarious to laugh at someone :hysterical: This is great. A) You’ve just committed yourself to hours, if not days worth of work with stats and b) you already know they’re going to be useless and you already know people are going to laugh at them so you’re somehow trying to avoid looking like a complete fool. Sorry to disappoint you my fella, but nothing, absolutely NOTHING will stop me from mocking the crap outta your ‘calculations’, as and when post them. :icflove:
zen Posted February 11, 2011 Author Posted February 11, 2011 I love how you’re desperately trying to buy an insurance cover, to prevent people from laughing at the numbers you’re going to post, by pretending that It would be hilarious to laugh at someone :hysterical: This is great. A) You’ve just committed yourself to hours, if not days worth of work with stats and b) you already know they’re going to be useless and you already know people are going to laugh at them so you’re somehow trying to avoid looking like a complete fool. Sorry to disappoint you my fella, but nothing, absolutely NOTHING will stop me from mocking the crap outta your ‘calculations’, as and when post them. :icflove: If the goal is to laugh at me to revenge all that I have done to you, why wait till I post the numbers :hysterical: And don't forget, most folks realize that those numbers won't be accurate so what you be laughing at. And by chance, if those numbers are close or even if the result is like what I said then you are going to look like a fool. It's you who has everything to lose here :P
Recommended Posts