pensionplan Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Let's not lose track of this thread. It has the potential to go all the way.
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 where is my friend, chicken? No comments from him yet! May be someone is doing Puk Puk Puk to him :hysterical:
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 where is my friend, chicken? No comments from him yet! May be someone is doing Puk Puk Puk to him :hysterical: Your 'prediction' does not even deserve a read in the first place, let alone a comment :hysterical::hysterical: To say you will just consider India's last 2 D/N games played in B'lore to 'predict' their score in the 27th Feb game.. :haha::haha: If that wasnt worse enough, you simply abandoned the whole B'lore criterion and just took the last 5 D/N they played for England..:cantstop: I cant even begin to explain how your 'prediction' is so wrong at so many levels, but let me ask you this - for you to think this was a worthwhile effort that you want people to comment on, that is a level of delusion i have not seen from anyone else before. that is the problem with you my friend - the 'image' that you have yourself in your mind, doesnt quite match the perception we get, from reading sheer 'genius' posts like these... :hysterical:
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 Your 'prediction' does not even deserve a read in the first place, let alone a comment :hysterical::hysterical: To say you will just consider India's last 2 D/N games played in B'lore to 'predict' their score in the 27th Feb game.. :haha::haha: If that wasnt worse enough, you simply abandoned the whole B'lore criterion and just took the last 5 D/N they played at England..:cantstop: I cant even begin to explain how your 'prediction' is so wrong at so many levels, but let me ask you this - for you to think this was a worthwhile effort that you want people to comment on, that is a level of delusion i have not seen from anyone else before. that is the problem with you my friend - the 'image' that you have yourself in your mind, doesnt quite match the perception we get, from reading sheer 'genius' posts like these... :hysterical: Ok, the chicken came finally! So what's the right number? :spiteful: puk puk puk :hysterical:
Roshanrocks Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Morris... :idunno: why are u wasting ur time?
Roshanrocks Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Let's not lose track of this thread. It has the potential to go all the way. yea its almost half way there :icflove:
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Dude, i was just going through your 'prediction'.. - I am sorry to say, but are you a primary school drop-out? Either that, or simply failed your math entirely.::cantstop: So lets say we have a new stadium that both teams havent played in, how does your 'model' work? You just sit around and scratch your head? :hysterical: Trust me, the more you want people to read your 'prediction', the more embarrassing, its going to get for you!
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Morris... :idunno: why are u wasting ur time? I know dude.. Can you imagine, the guy has the barefaced cheek to ask people to 'read' his 'prediction' and comment on it? He doesnt realize that we're all doing him a favor by staying from the collective laughathon that his 'predictions' provide us to all. :hysterical:
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 Dude, i was just going through your 'prediction'.. - I am sorry to say, but are a primary school drop-out? Either that, or simply failed your math entirely.::cantstop: So lets say we have a new stadium that both teams havent played in, how does your 'model' work? You just sit around and scratch your head? :hysterical: A reminder, what's your number? :--D After so many failed and comical assumption, the new one is that this is the "universal" model :hysterical:
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 I know dude.. Can you imagine, the guy has the barefaced cheek to ask people to 'read' his 'prediction' and comment on it? He doesnt realize that we're all doing him a favor by staying from the collective laughathon that his 'predictions' provide us to all. :hysterical: Who are "we"? :giggle:
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 A reminder, what's your number? :--D After so many failed and comical assumption, the new one is that this is the "universal" model :hysterical: Huh, what? You do realize that beyond a point, you get completely incorrigible and muddled right? Why do you ask my for 'prediction'? So that people can gather around and laugh at mine, like they do at yours? :hysterical: How good are you at reading tell-tale signs? Not a single guy, NOT ONE, has even bothered to put in a response to your 'challenge'. Thats how stupid we all think it is.:hysterical:
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Who are "we"? :giggle: Hum, Everybody else, who couldnt be bothered to respond to your 'challenge'? :hysterical::hysterical:
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 Let's look at how the chicken went about in this thread: Errm, the whole premise of the challenge is flawed - There’s almost little to no correlation between what our batsmen average against our bowlers, to what they might end up scoring on that day. And there’s no point trying to predict a score based on things like pitches as well, because we have to factor in things like injuries to players, fall of early wickets etc, which is impossible to do at this point in time. Yea, 1000s of people understand this ‘challenge’, which is why we’ve had 100s of pages of unending replies from posters who are simply too eager to put in their responses. To even claim that we can predict, within reasonable limits of accuracy, the scores of games based on our batsmen averages against opposition bowler’s ER and ER is one of the dumbest things I’ve heard in my life. But hey, given your record disconnected delusion, no wonder you think it’s a ‘challenge’.. P.S; Btw, what happened to your ‘Typos are sign that I am grown-up’ logic? Forgot already ? I have a 'challenge' for all the posters here. The distance between point A and point B is 100 miles, so I want you guys to tell me how many people named Peter live between those two points. It's great challenge folks, so please lets get on with it. Actually guys, I know this is a dumb question you cannot do it, but you see, that is where the 'challenge' lies EXACTLY. If the dude-who-addresses-himself-in-the-third-person thinks this a valid question, lets see what ‘calculations’ he can come up with, for his own ‘challenge’. Boy, I cant wait to see the responses. Its HAS to be either exceptionally good or unbelievably stupid and i think i already know which one its going to be. Thank you for proving my point, senor. Now please do the honorable thing and accept that your question is either dumb, or imperfect, or both and move on. The longer you try to pretend like it’s a valid mathematical ‘challenge’, the stupider you’re going to look. (which is actually pretty hard because you're already reached the pinnacle of your 'potential') See dude, this is the problem with you. You’re obviously still smarting from our, shall I say, friendly exchanges, which is why the moment you saw my response, your BP shot a few notches. My response to the OP would have been the same if anybody else had asked the same question, because it is, quite frankly, a dumb question (as others have pointed as well). Now, you don’t want to accept it because your ego is stopping you from doing so, which means you’re going to spend some solid time coming up with ‘mathematical calculations’ which I guarantee, will be 100% inaccurate. Take my suggestion – save your breadth, just say this was a bad idea in the first place and move on. I am still waiting for your ‘calculations’ hero. Lets see what you got. Trust me, its not looking good for you. Or in plain English, makes it IMPOSSIBLE. I see that you're slowly gravitating towards the inevitable. Good, we're making progress here. ^ STILL not throwing in the towel, are you? Seriously dude, you’re impossible. Apparently, the number of 'those' who think this is a worthwhile exercise and hence have put in some time giving some repsonses so far? = ZERO. Come on hero, enough of small talk. Show me the money, lets see your 'numbers'. Smoke screen ALERT! Smoke screen ALERT! No one’s bothered about what Sachin Tendulkar would have averaged in the 40s or the 70s now. Come on dude, lets your numbers for the ‘challenge’ you posed to the rest of us. Edit; A'right I am off. I know you're not going to show ANY calculations, partly because a)by your admission, you're not too good at stats (and boy, thinking about it, i should have guessed as much from our prior 'debates.'.) and b) even if you come up with something rudimentary, its going to look completely stupid and inaccurate. Common man's translation: I have no effin idea what I am talking about. I am not going to give you anything because I have finally realized it’s a stupid question. Thanks, that’s all I wanted to know. I have to say, The dude-who-addresses-himself-in-the-third-person never fails to entertain me. The guy keeps saying he will do the ‘calculations’, but so far, he hasn’t shown a SINGLE digit, not even for symbolic purposes.. Not even ONE. A’right, lets hear a deadline. What time will you have the ‘calculations’ ready? There goes your weekend! I pity you. You’re going to spend hour upon hour, digging up random, disconnected numbers from cricinfo and try to compile them, only to find in the end that they don’t make any sense whatsoever. No, I do however, plan on getting a great laugh outta them. Hence the eagerness for the deadline. that make no sense whatsoever. *Marks Calendar to recheck this thread before deadline*. I love how you’re desperately trying to buy an insurance cover, to prevent people from laughing at the numbers you’re going to post, by pretending that It would be hilarious to laugh at someone This is great. A) You’ve just committed yourself to hours, if not days worth of work with stats and b) you already know they’re going to be useless and you already know people are going to laugh at them so you’re somehow trying to avoid looking like a complete fool. Sorry to disappoint you my fella, but nothing, absolutely NOTHING will stop me from mocking the crap outta your ‘calculations’, as and when post them OMG, how did i miss this in the first place?! So you’re conceding that your ‘calculations’ wont make sense when you ‘publish’ them (what a great day, that would be!), but if by sheer fluke they turn out to be correct, then you wont hesitate take credit for them. Even an astrologer’s parrot has a one-in-two chance of accurately predicting who the winner of a match is going to be. So what, we believe whatever the parrot says.? Its good to know that the dude-who-refers-to-himself-in-the-third-person is now completely banking on nothing but sheer luck, for the scores to match his ‘prediction’ so that he can come back later and say ‘See, I told ya..’. No no my dear fella. I like your persistence, but sometimes, brevity is more useful than feigned valor. See, you should have realized a looooooooong time ago (in fact, I know you have realized already) that this was a VERYYYY bad idea and its better to say ‘My bad.. wrong move..’ and just move on. But hey, that’s just not a possibility right? That’s just a random collection of words that doesn’t actually mean anything right? Anyways, see you before 27th feb! Lulz, that’s some of the weirdest piece of convoluted logic I have listened to, in my life. Especially this line – ‘Only those who take the challenge can "morally" laugh at others' numbers’. What in the God's green earth, is that supposed to mean! And all the responses on this thread! What a piece of ****! :hysterical:
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Guys, here comes the prediction! Ind vs Eng @ B'lore If Ind bats first: 295 If Eng bats first: 277 For how did I arrive at the number, see below: 1. Games considered for Ind: last 2 D/N games at B'lore. Ind is used to these conditions so it's performance in last 3 years, i.e. 2 games gets the weightage 2. Games considered for Eng: last 5 D/N games in Ind. For Eng, the data sample size is small so it is better to take its performance in last 5 D/N games in Ind. Ind: Ind's batting avg (6.87*50*2)+Eng's bowling avg(5.53*50*5) divided by 7 = approx. 295 Eng: Eng's batting avg (5.02*50*5)+Ind's bowling avg (6.84*50*2) divided by 7 = approx. 277 Probable result: Ind wins :two_thumbs_up: Note: The data is available for everyone to use, but the interesting thing is how you use it. Thanks! Hain, what utter crap is this? :haha: so you're taking India's batting average from the last 2 D/N we played at B'lore, adding it with England's bowling average from their matches against ALL OVER THE COUNTRY and dividing it by the sum of matches? :hysterical::hysterical: Honestly, while you're at it, you might as well added your b'day, subtracted your favorite number and divided that by the number of rooms in your home. Trust me, it would have made no difference to your logic whatsoever. :hysterical: Btw, do you realize that one of our previous games against england in B'lore was a rain affected one where we played only 22 overs? Did you do the appropriate weighting for that game, or did you simply throw in that number as well? :hysterical:
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Let's look at how the chicken went about in this thread: And all the responses on this thread! What a piece of ****! :hysterical: So when you finally run of out things to say, which happens to you every once in a while, you just randomly quote all my posts? :hysterical: Actually, you owe me a thanks. I was the one who could even be bothered to respond to your orphan thread in the first place.. :hysterical::hysterical:
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 Huh, what? You do realize that beyond a point, you get completely incorrigible and muddled right? Why do you ask my for 'prediction'? So that people can gather around and laugh at mine, like they do at yours? :hysterical: How good are you at reading tell-tale signs? Not a single guy, NOT ONE, has even bothered to put in a response to your 'challenge'. Thats how stupid we all think it is.:hysterical: Omg, appears as if for him everything about laughing at or being laughed at. What a poor soul! Appears as if the wounds of being laughed out of one of the threads are still fresh in his heart :giggle: I thought it was understood that in order to say someone's number is wrong, you have to have a number in your head too. Never realized that it would be so difficult for you to understand :hysterical:
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Omg, appears as if for him everything about being laughing or being laughed at. What a poor soul! Appears as if the wounds of being laughed out of one of the threads are still fresh in his heart :giggle: I thought it was understood that in order to say someone's number is wrong, you have to have a number in your head too. Never realized that it would be so difficult for you to understand :hysterical: I am sorry sir, unfortunately, I dont have the sado-masochistic instincts that you seem to possesses. Normal people like me would rather avoid the the embarrassment of being laughed at, .. No thanks. :haha:
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 Hain, what utter crap is this? :haha: so you're taking India's batting average from the last 2 D/N we played at B'lore, adding it with England's bowling average from their matches against ALL OVER THE COUNTRY and dividing it by the sum of matches? :hysterical::hysterical: Honestly, while you're at it, you might as well added your b'day, subtracted your favorite number and divided that by the number of rooms in your home. Trust me, it would have made no difference to your logic whatsoever. :hysterical: Btw, do you realize that one of our previous games against england in B'lore was a rain affected one where we played only 22 overs? Did you do the appropriate weighting for that game, or did you simply throw in that number as well? :hysterical: I will say this AGAIN, since you are saying that everything I did is wrong, you should know what the right answer is, correct? So what is that answer? :--D
Ram Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 I will say this AGAIN' date=' since you are saying that everything I did is wrong, you should know what the right answer is, correct? So what is that answer? :--D[/quote'] Thats some great mullah logic there.. :hysterical::hysterical: Your challenge doesnt DESERVE a response dude, which is why, not a single poster, NOT ONE, has bothered to respond? How hard is it for you to understand? :hysterical:
zen Posted February 12, 2011 Author Posted February 12, 2011 I am sorry sir' date=' unfortunately, I dont have the sado-masochistic instincts that you seem to possesses. Normal people like me would rather avoid the the embarrassment of being laughed at, .. No thanks. :haha:[/quote'] So I will take it that you don't have a clue on how to do it! :hysterical: Thanks!
Recommended Posts