Jump to content

Petulant Ponting facing cup ban


b555

Recommended Posts

Posted

ArseChatu Mahanama keeps on working on securing as Australian citizenship for himself and his family. Time and again these 'naram-tatti' Lankans like Mahanama and Madugalle have saved these Aussie and English players..As if they are on their payrolls..

Posted
ArseChatu Mahanama keeps on working on securing as Australian citizenship for himself and his family. Time and again these 'naram-tatti' Lankans like Mahanama and Madugalle have saved these Aussie and English players..As if they are on their payrolls..
Lol... but the worst of the lot are windies referees. I remember that when Lloyd was the match ref he hardly used to go against Aussies or English but come down hard against other teams.
Posted
It sounds likely that an abdominal guard can damage the screen of a TV. I've seen the LCD of my laptop crack when dropped from a mere 4-6 inches. Surely an abdominal guard flung with some frustration would have that much force.
If abdominal guard was thrown directly at TV, I can still see some possibility of that thing breaking TV. But some thing like abdominal guard coming off the bounce from a not-so-solid surface of Kit-bag, which would hardly leave any speed on the thing bouncing off, and then breakig TV is quite hard to believe. This is of course some story that Australian dressing room came up with to protect Ponting which outside world have no option but to believe. However, I am fine with ICC reaction on this issue. It really didn't call for ban or something like fine etc.
Posted
However, I am fine with ICC Mahanama's reaction on this issue. It really didn't call for ban or something like fine etc.
Fixed the text. Broad's against any non-white team player would have gotten a ban for a fine.
Posted

Wow only warned..LOL, not even a fine? How on the earth abdominal guard can break the TV. those things are very light in weight. This is laughable.

Posted
Wow only warned..LOL, not even a fine? How on the earth abdominal guard can break the TV. those things are very light in weight. This is laughable.
ponting was still attached to it :winky:
Posted

ponting has an air of arrogance n short-tempered-ness abt him...like he said 'Its not in australian culture to do things such as match fixing' implying that its in subcontinent culture to fix matches in the context. Refusing to do congratulatory shake-hands with AB devilliars, pushing sharad pawar off the podium, sydney test, Aleem daar incidence and now this one are the few that I can recall atm....

Posted

It was an accident, which obviously doesn't excuse his actions but it should mean that some people should take back their words about "Australia having a thug mentality"..

Posted
ponting was still attached to it :winky:
It was an accident' date=' which obviously doesn't excuse his actions but it should mean that some people should take back their words about "Australia having a thug mentality"..[/quote'] I agree. It was not a very nice thing, but it's being blown out of proportions. He should get a warning and if he has any shame, he should issue an apology, which I think he must have done already.
Posted
It was an accident' date=' which obviously doesn't excuse his actions but it should mean that some people should take back their words about "Australia having a thug mentality"..[/quote'] it was bad to generalize. But I still would like to understand how this accident happen? What type of Ad guard he wears that breaks TV when bounced off the kit bag...
Posted
it was bad to generalize. But I still would like to understand how this accident happen? What type of Ad guard he wears that breaks TV when bounced off the kit bag...
well.. I doubt if that was an accident. However, in absence of any other account available we have to believe whatever stories Australian team/mgmt is giving. Anyways in either case issue has definitely been blown out of proportion..
Posted
it was bad to generalize. But I still would like to understand how this accident happen? What type of Ad guard he wears that breaks TV when bounced off the kit bag...
According to CA's version, which I read somewhere, there was no damage to the tv. Ponting apparently threw his guard which bounced and hit the tv. The tv was alright. The media just exaggerated it all for attention. But that's CA's version.
Posted

I dont think a Abdominal guard is heavy enough to bounce off some other surface and still cause damage to an LCD screen. He must have hit it directly. But itni bhi badi baat nahi thi, its not like he physically assaulted a spectator or anything.

Posted
Ricky Ponting says he has been surprised by the furore which developed after he damaged a TV in the team's dressing room. Ponting was reprimanded by the ICC on Thursday morning (AEDT) after accepting the charge under the code of conduct. Amid a frenzy of attacks on Ponting from the Indian media, the Australia captain thanked the ICC for not "over-reacting". The charge relates to "abuse of cricket equipment or clothing, ground equipment or fixtures and fittings during an international match". Following their 91-run win over Zimbabwe in their opening ICC Cricket World Cup match on Monday in Ahmedabad, Ponting's defending champions arrived in Nagpur late on Wednesday. "It has probably turned into something bigger than I expected I must admit," Ponting told reporters on Thursday in his first comments since the ICC verdict was announced. Follow all the action of Australia's showdown with New Zealand with foxsports.com.au's Live Event Blog from 2.30pm (EDT) on Friday. Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar. End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar. "But I'm trying to move on from it now. I met with the referee last night and he accepted the reprimand that came my way and I understand the action of mine caused damage in the change rooms which led to the breach of the code of conduct. "I got that out last night, but we have to move on as quick as we can and hopefully everybody understands the story that is out there." ICC match referee Roshan Mahanama said Ponting admitted he was in breach of the code following a moment of frustration after being run out for 28. It was clear that the damage was accidental and Ponting agreed to pay for the damage, Mahanama said. Ponting, who was fined 40 per cent of his match fee for a long argument with umpire Aleem Dar during this summer's fourth Ashes Test in Melbourne, said he was grateful to the ICC for the way they handled the TV incident following a letter of complaint from the Gujarat Cricket Association. "I had the chance to explain the list of events properly to the ICC last night, which is the first time they had heard from me about it," Ponting said. "I explained the whole story, the fact I was sitting near the television, the fact that I'd sat in my seat and taken my pads and gloves off and then stood up and threw my box and it bounced off my bag and hit the TV. "They were good in listening to what I had to say and not over-reacting too much to the other pressures that may have been out there. "I accept what's come my way so far and I'm keen to put it behind me and worry about the game."
I think it has definately been blown out of proportion. Hopefully it can now be forgotten about and we can move on.
Posted
According to CA's version' date=' which I read somewhere, there was no damage to the tv. Ponting apparently threw his guard which bounced and hit the tv. The tv was alright. The media just exaggerated it all for attention. But that's CA's version.[/quote'] If there was no damage to the TV, how would anyone outside the Aussie dressing room know this incident happened?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...