rajmarie Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 Murli.....is a champion bowler...& smiling assassin. He along with Kumble & Warne made watching spin bowlers exciting again. He had helped SL become a major cricketing nation in a big way....& nobody in SL can replace him ever. Murli....may your Intl. career end in a LOSS
pensionplan Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 So' date= Moody said, under lab conditions, he bowled the lot. Off-breaks, topspin, doosra, from all angles and at a whole range of speeds. Not one delivery came close to, never mind exceeded, the 15-degree limit. Moody still has the report, detailing every ball bowled. That should shut some mouths or errr... typists here in ICFHa...Marali the smiling assassin one of the best match winners ever in the game. Love the guy and the way he goes about his business. He has been to bowling in terms of accomplishments what Sachin has been to batting. A genius albeit a controversial one. The smile will be sorely missed.
SriLankanLion Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 [QUOඨ්E=ර්*ඔර්*ඔ;1410996]:හ්ම්ම්ම්:[/QUOඨ්E] He's the boss! :--D
Homerus_Unus Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 That should shut some mouths or errr... typists here in ICF Unfortunately, it isn't going to do that. Invincible ignorance is rather rampant here.
Midfielder Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 He is a guy who flaunts the rules and should be called. No respect here.
Midfielder Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Even in that thread Murali was defended. Anyways, don't mind the 10 yr olds who have just started watching cricket. Trolls are everywhere. Not everyone who disagrees with him is 10 year old. Maybe you are.
coffee_rules Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 So, who is to say how much he bends in a match where he is putting extra effort ? If one cannot say for sure, then we should apply what the law says, let the on-field umpire decide on looks. Nobody will understand he got away on a technicality. For me Even Randiv > Murali.
yoda Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Murali says :finger: to all his doubters as his parting gift. :icflove:
Midfielder Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Murali says :finger: to all his doubters as his parting gift. :icflove: My problem with Murali is that he takes the credit away from the best spinner of all the times "Anil Kumble". No body questioned his integrity. ever. To compare the two is a crime.
yoda Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 My problem with Murali is that he takes the credit away from the best spinner of all the times "Anil Kumble". No body questioned his integrity. ever. To compare the two is a crime. What did Murali do to take credit away other than just keep getting wickets at a crazy pace? Murali/Kumble/Warne have a lot of respect from all of us and each other, I would rather leave it at that. Did Murali stop Kumble from getting 800 wickets? :dontknow: I don't think his bending/deformity is what got him the wickets. He played on a team which depended on him a lot, he didn't have to share his wickets with other spinners, he played a lot at home in friendly conditions, all of this helped him get his tally.
Midfielder Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 What did Murali do to take credit away other than just keep getting wickets at a crazy pace? Murali/Kumble/Warne have a lot of respect from all of us and each other, I would rather leave it at that. Did Murali stop Kumble from getting 800 wickets? :dontknow: I don't think his bending/deformity is what got him the wickets. He played on a team which depended on him a lot, he didn't have to share his wickets with other spinners, he played a lot at home in friendly conditions, all of this helped him get his tally. And the minor detail of bending his arm to get little bit extra spin. Anil lived by the rules and did not do so well. Rspect for each other shows how much great a character Anil Bhai is. He is willing to overlook. I am petty, not as great as Anil so I feel miffed if credit is taken away from him.
yoda Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 And the minor detail of bending his arm to get little bit extra spin. Anil lived by the rules and did not do so well. Rspect for each other shows how much great a character Anil Bhai is. He is willing to overlook. I am petty' date=' not as great as Anil so I feel miffed if credit is taken away from him.[/quote'] Compare Murali's situation to Akhtar. Did the bending/deformity help him do any better than his peers other than to hurl a few quick ones on and off? Those of you who suspect Murali's action are forgetting that he became great not because he could spin a little bit more, but because he has that special in him which only the great ones have.
rkt.india Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 So' date=' Moody said, under lab conditions, he bowled the lot. Off-breaks, topspin, doosra, from all angles and at a whole range of speeds. Not one delivery came close to, never mind exceeded, the [b']15-degree limit. Moody still has the report, detailing every ball bowled. That should shut some mouths or errr... typists here in ICF Why 15-degree? ICC should raise it to 50 degree. What difference it will make to a spinner whether he bowls at 10, 15 or 50 degree bend. Before it was 5 degree for spinners, but for Murli's sake it was raised to 15 degree. For fast bowlers, it is 10 degree now. Its a rubbish rule from ICC. Any degree bend is chucking and ICC must be strict on it or otherwise remove any limits for spinners at least. It will make the game more interesting. That was not a Narco test, that was in lab and every bowler will be extra careful not bend the elbow too much...I have seen his video clips of test and they were certainly different that how he bowls in actual matches. Murli has been a minnow basher...he has not had good record in India and in Australia. Warne is miles ahead.
thongale Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Why 15-degree? ICC should raise it to 50 degree. What difference it will make to a spinner whether he bowls at 10, 15 or 50 degree bend. Before it was 5 degree for spinners, but for Murli's sake it was raised to 15 degree. For fast bowlers, it is 10 degree now. Its a rubbish rule from ICC. Any degree bend is chucking and ICC must be strict on it or otherwise remove any limits for spinners at least. It will make the game more interesting. That was not a Narco test, that was in lab and every bowler will be extra careful not bend the elbow too much...I have seen his video clips of test and they were certainly different that how he bowls in actual matches. Murli has been a minnow basher...he has not had good record in India and in Australia. Warne is miles ahead.Some body has woken from hibernation it seems. :finger:
rkt.india Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Some body has woken from hibernation it seems. :finger: Its called difference of opinions. Some will be supporting Murli and some not. I am not forced to support him if I do not support the rationale of ICC in bending rules. I do not hate him or do not say he is not a great bowler. He is a great bowler.
thongale Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Nah, it's called hibernation, because most of the facts in you post have been dreams in the hibernation. 1. Before it was 5 degree for spinners - It was proven that all bowlers except Sarwan extend their elbows 2. But for Murli's sake it was raised to 15 degree - It was raised because even guys like McGrath and Pollock went up to 12 degrees of extension. If the level was left at 10 degrees, Murali would have been safe with the offie, but McGrath and Pollock would have been out for chucking. 3. 15 degrees were chosen, because it was the minimum amount of extension that needed for human eye to see a change of action So, better educate yourself before dishing out rubbish.
rkt.india Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Nah, it's called hibernation, because most of the facts in you post have been dreams in the hibernation. 1. Before it was 5 degree for spinners - It was proven that all bowlers except Sarwan extend their elbows 2. But for Murli's sake it was raised to 15 degree - It was raised because even guys like McGrath and Pollock went up to 12 degrees of extension. If the level was left at 10 degrees, Murali would have been safe with the offie, but McGrath and Pollock would have been out for chucking. 3. 15 degrees were chosen, because it was the minimum amount of extension that needed for human eye to see a change of action So, better educate yourself before dishing out rubbish. For fast bowlers, it is still 10 degrees, if you know it and likes of Pollock and McGrath never tested for degrees in labs. If you have any proof than give it. Do you think Kumble and Warne extended their elbow...Its ridiculous to hear about it from you. Sarwan is not a bowler, you forgot.
thongale Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 For fast bowlers, it is still 10 degrees, if you know it and likes of Pollock and McGrath never tested for degrees in labs. If you have any proof than give it. Do you think Kumble and Warne extended their elbow...Its ridiculous to hear about it from you. Sarwan is not a bowler, you forgot.For every bowler it is 15 degrees. Extensive research conducted by the International Cricket Council is set to reveal that 99% of bowlers in the history of cricket have been throwers. and in-depth research has revealed that even bowlers like Glenn McGrath and Shaun Pollock, usually considered examplars of the classical action, occasionally go over the prescribed tolerance limit, bending their arms by as much as 12 degrees. Based on these findings, the ICC is to extend the tolerance limit to 15 degrees for all bowlers, regardless of whether they bowl at Shane Warne's pace or Shoaib Akhtar's. Source
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now