Sachin was out says Ajmal.I say he wasn't - Mike Haysman. Hawkeye comments

[vvvslaxman]

Last year' date=' the batting conditions were terrible. Its not like that Eng & Aus were scoring 500 against us. We won 2 test matches despite missing out 2 best bats.Lets see how many test matches India win in UK this year.[/quote'] Anil kumble has a test century in England. Ganguly averages more in England than in India. Indians never had problem in England. Any of the batsman actually against any attack. You guys lost 1-3 and 1-3 twice in a row. It has been 14 years since we lost a series to England.

[satyam1729]

Last year' date=' the batting conditions were terrible. Its not like that Eng & Aus were scoring 500 against us. We won 2 test matches despite missing out 2 best bats.Lets see how many test matches India win in UK this year.[/quote'] India has not lost a series in UK for 15 years.

[Ramzz]

Hawk-Eye company publishes analysis of Sachin Tendulkar lbw reprieve Hawk-Eye Innovations has defended the accuracy of its tracking technology used during the Cricket World Cup's most controversial umpiring moment, when an lbw decision against Sachin Tendulkar was reversed during India's semi-final against Pakistan. Ian Gould gave Tendulkar out lbw to Saeed Ajmal and shook his head with mystification when the decision was overturned on referral – a moment that may have cost England's leading official his chance to umpire in the World Cup final. Conspiracy theories abounded. Ajmal claimed he had bowled an arm ball that Hawk-Eye had somehow misread and there was even speculation that the wrong delivery had somehow been super-imposed, perhaps as part of a deliberate plot. Stephen Carter, the managing director of Hawk-Eye Innovations, has now published details of the Tendulkar reprieve on the company's website to counter the rumours. "The path Hawk-Eye showed was accurate and the Decision Review System was used correctly to overturn the umpire's original decision," Carter said. "The Hawk-Eye track lines up perfectly with the video of the real ball from release to impact point. "The commentators said on air that Tendulkar had been 'caught on the crease'. From the front-on angle it does look like Tendulkar has been hit when batting in his crease. However, Tendulkar was almost two metres out of his crease when struck." The analysis seems to disprove Ajmal's contention that he bowled an arm ball, with the line clearly showing a slightly turning off-spinner. Carter said that Ajmal also bowled this delivery from wider on the crease than any other ball in his spell – evidence not in their report to the International Cricket Council – which backs up Hawk-Eye's analysis that the ball would have missed leg stump. As to the suggestion that the wrong ball was superimposed, Carter regards that as the sort of lurid theory that could develop only in an India v Pakistan World Cup semi-final. "Theoretically it is possible but in a practical sense you couldn't superimpose a wrong ball," he said. "It would not line up perfectly and it would be perfectly obvious to everybody." Hawk-Eye routinely sends the ICC a study of any decision that is overturned on referral and this is passed down to the umpire for further analysis. "The system is devised so that umpires can have all the feedback they need," he said. Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/apr/06/hawk-eye-sachin-tendulkar-lbw-reprieve

[putrevus]

Last year' date=' the batting conditions were terrible. Its not like that Eng & Aus were scoring 500 against us. We won 2 test matches despite missing out 2 best bats.Lets see how many test matches India win in UK this year.[/quote'] you won two and lost how many lost I remember four of six matches not only lost you were blown away in those 4 matches and you are talking about winning two matches . You have some nerve to come here and compare your crappy team with world no1 test team.

[Karan114]

Last year' date=' the batting conditions were terrible. Its not like that Eng & Aus were scoring 500 against us. We won 2 test matches despite missing out 2 best bats.Lets see how many test matches India win in UK this year.[/quote'] Your sorry team has won just one series in four years. Just because your got your asses handed over to you by the English means nothing when it comes to the number one Test nation on the planet. We last lost a series to England fifteen years ago - in that time your team has lost three series to them.

[Sir_Afridi]

Anil kumble has a test century in England. Ganguly averages more in England than in India. Indians never had problem in England. Any of the batsman actually against any attack. You guys lost 1-3 and 1-3 twice in a row. It has been 14 years since we lost a series to England.

Your stats are right but this English test team under Strauss & Flower is different from that of in 90s. We lost because of batting. Imagine India going to UK with Raina,Kohli & Pujara in middle order against Anderson & Swann.

[Karan114]

Your stats are right but this English test team under Strauss & Flower is different from that of in 90s. We lost because of batting. Imagine India going to UK with Raina' date=Kohli & Pujara in middle order against Anderson & Swann.

We beat them in 2007. Strauss, Cook, Bell, Anderson, Tremlett, Prior, Pietersen all played that series. Find another excuse.

[putrevus]

Your stats are right but this English test team under Strauss & Flower is different from that of in 90s. We lost because of batting. Imagine India going to UK with Raina' date='Kohli & Pujara in middle order against Anderson & Swann.[/quote'] we will still smash their bowling . India batting is not made of useless batsmen like Imran Farhats.Kumble smashed Anderson for century so our guys will do just fine.

[vvvslaxman]

We beat them in 2007. Strauss' date=' Cook, Bell, Anderson, Tremlett, Prior, Pietersen all played that series. Find another excuse.[/quote'] Sidebottom was doing well for them as well

[Karan114]

As to the suggestion that the wrong ball was superimposed, Carter regards that as the sort of lurid theory that could develop only in an India v Pakistan World Cup semi-final. "Theoretically it is possible but in a practical sense you couldn't superimpose a wrong ball," he said. "It would not line up perfectly and it would be perfectly obvious to everybody."

Mr. Carter, you clearly aren't familiar with Pakistanis. For them, the whole world is all a giant conspiracy theory that exists solely to target "pure" Pakistan. Be warned, after this article a certain forum will count you amongst RAW, Mossad, CIA as part of the grand plot to destabilize Pakistan by turning down a lbw in a cricket match.

[Sachin=GOD]

They can say whatever they like.................Bottom Line is - We Beat Them...........We are 5-0 against them in WCs .......................................WE ARE THE WORLD CHAMPIONS.

[vvvslaxman]

Actually this is the part that hawk eye missed. after impact it takes a right turn and slightly behind and then bounces and lands behind the stump and from there it takes off knocks the stumps from the behind.

[ganeshran]

^ :hysterical: :hysterical:

:hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical:

[Cricket Tragic]

Actually this is the part that hawk eye missed. after impact it takes a right turn and slightly behind and then bounces and lands behind the stump and from there it takes off knocks the stumps from the behind.

:hysterical:

[Sachin=GOD]

^:adore: :adore:

[Silva]

Great pic VVS. I knew from the second I saw hawkeye that tendulkar was safe. But stupid comentators made me doubt it.

[vvvslaxman]

Your stats are right but this English test team under Strauss & Flower is different from that of in 90s. We lost because of batting. Imagine India going to UK with Raina' date='Kohli & Pujara in middle order against Anderson & Swann.[/quote'] Last 10 years. performance of Indian/Pakistan batsmen who were below the age 25...in England against England http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?agemax1=25;ageval1=age;class=1;filter=advanced;home_or_away=2;opposition=1;orderby=runs;spanmax1=06+Apr+2011;spanmin1=06+Apr+2001;spanval1=span;team=6;team=7;template=results;type=batting I have hired few pakistan girls to show the finger :--D

[Cricket Tragic]

Aggy

[Sir_Afridi]

Hafeez & Zulqarnain are better batsmen than Sehwag in UK.

[Karan114]

Actually this is the part that hawk eye missed. after impact it takes a right turn and slightly behind and then bounces and lands behind the stump and from there it takes off knocks the stumps from the behind.

Lol, someone put it on padosis :cantstop: