Jump to content

BCCI to oppose DRS recommendation


Feed

Recommended Posts

Posted
More... BCCI to oppose DRS recommendation Devendra Pandey Fri May 13 2011 The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) decided to remain steadfast in its longstanding opposition of the Decision Review System (DRS) by rejecting the ICC cricket committee's proposal to use the system for all international matches. Sources in the Indian board confirmed on Thursday that the BCCI was against having the DRS for their international fixtures, a stand that they maintained over the last couple of years. “The players don't want it and they have informed us about it a long time back when the DRS came into existence. The system is not complete and it was exposed during the World Cup,†said a top BCCI official. Ironically, the Indians along with the Sri Lankans were the first guinea pigs of the review system during the 2008 Test series in the Emerald Isle. The visitors ended up having a torrid time with it, getting only one decision reversed successfully. Ever since, the board and the players have been reluctant to use the referral method. Meanwhile, it is almost certain that despite the ICC cricket committee's recommendation, there will be no DRS during India's upcoming tour to the West Indies. “We will try to convince the West Indies Cricket board to not have the DRS during the tour,†a BCCI source said. The DRS has been used intermittently in Test matches since 2009 — 31 Tests in this period to be precise. But having used the review system during the recently concluded World Cup, the ICC cricket committee had recommended that referrals be brought into play for the limited-over formats too but with a slight difference — wherein teams would have only one unsuccessful review per innings.
Posted

I agree, they are the ruling body of the game, and if they want something implemented across the board then they should do it without worrying about what individual boards may think. It's a bit ridiculous that each home board can decide whether they would like it or not. It should either be used for every series or for none.

Posted

To every one here.... Because its expensive piece of kit ($56K dollars per day usage). Hot spots costs just $6K BCCI will be biggest customer to the kit because of IPL and number of home games india plays. Its British kit with Sony's support. British media is supporting it. No one else

Posted
Whole world has no problem with DRS' date=' I can't understand why BCCI and players dont want it. ICC should ignore BCCI and go ahead with the recommendation.[/quote'] BCCI as a board is doing much better than any other board. Why jump into bandwagon. What if other boards got huge discounts just to make sure BCCI buys this kit which is no better than host spots.
Posted
As always...The jokers in BCCI screwing the Indian cricket. FUC K U BCCI
Above message tells very much about you, incapability to think objectively
Posted
To every one here.... Because its expensive piece of kit ($56K dollars per day usage). Hot spots costs just $6K BCCI will be biggest customer to the kit because of IPL and number of home games india plays. Its British kit with Sony's support. British media is supporting it. No one else
Dude don't use Computer ?why because most of its parts are "Made in CHINA" thus you're helping CHina [thats true ],but at the sometime you too are helped from it .
Posted
Dude don't use Computer ?why because most of its parts are "Made in CHINA" thus you're helping CHina [thats true ]' date=but at the sometime you too are helped from it .
So Buy a Sukhoi for travilling to my office. Dude $56K per day is huge if its supposed to be implemented in India. Aleem Dar has consitently given correct decision. It will be cheaper to clone Alleem Dar than buy this. Its all economics.
Posted

Overall UDRS is not bad. BCCI should get the 2.5 m rule rectified and then accept it. It is better than the umpiring blunders that we normally face anyways.

Posted

On this I am with ICC. Incase the BCCI rejects it completely then I hope ICC forcefully implements it though after rectification of the 2.5 m rule. This opposing is making any sense now and is becoming ridiculous. It is not that much of a demon as it is made out to be by BCCI. The umpires like De Silvas are a lot bigger demons.

Posted
. Dude $56K per day is huge
oh lol I thought you were saying $56 lol now I see $56K per wow (Rs 25 lakhs ) .makes sense can you tell us from where you get these figures ?
The cost to use the UDRS certainly runs very high - approximately $56' date='000 per match day (close to Rs 25 lakh). However, [i']the Indian board is reluctant to use the system not because of the expenditure involved but simply because they're not convinced that it is 100% foolproof. "We are not convinced about the UDRS and whether the system is foolproof. We discussed with the ICC too in the last meeting. It is the judgment of one (system) against the other (the umpire). Take the case of a leg before decision. The bounce on a cricket pitch always varies. It is not always the same. Similarly, in case there's a spinner on, the spin may vary, even the pace of the ball. We are not convinced if the UDRS can take all of this into account," BCCI president Shashank Manohar told TOI.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-08-06/top-stories/28299806_1_udrs-umpire-decision-review-system-bcci ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ @Mishraji : your argument over its cost isn't justified if BCCI doesn't have a problem with its expenditure .
Posted
Above message tells very much about you' date=' incapability to think objectively[/quote'] So u please elaborate...what is the objection from BCCI. Certainly they havent mentioned the cost. & if BCCI...the richest cricket board cant handle...how is the smaller boards doing it then. Currently...UDRS is used in WI. WI of all boards. & BCCI saying its not 100%. Well..then BCCI should stop funtioning also..because they themselves are not 100%....& dont tell me that u are incapable to believe that
Posted
So u please elaborate...what is the objection from BCCI. Certainly they havent mentioned the cost. & if BCCI...the richest cricket board cant handle...how is the smaller boards doing it then. Currently...UDRS is used in WI. WI of all boards. & BCCI saying its not 100%. Well..then BCCI should stop funtioning also..because they themselves are not 100%....& dont tell me that u are incapable to believe that
ICC is allready saying they will get discount.... Find below from the link. "Funding has been a major issue with the DRS with host boards and broadcasters left to pay bills but Richardson said that could change if it was used in all Tests. "I think if we get to a stage where all Full Members are happy to adopt the system for all Test series there would be the increased possibility that ICC could help fund the technology." http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...ry/514651.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...