Karan114 Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 forgive my ignorance, but I believe that your no.1 team has yet to win a test series here when you manage that, I'll call you the no. 1 Oh dear, what I am going to do now, a bitter South African isn't willing to call my team no.1 :((:((
julianlev Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 Duncan Fletcher is an Aussie? Do you even know what the hell you are talking about? Again, I repeat, no one gives a **** about group games in World Cups. How many times have your chokers gone unbeaten through a group stage in a World Cup before crumbling under the slightest hint of pressure? I know what people of your sorts mentality is - India are having a bad game, so come in and start gloating. But your South African team's results have been pretty damn ordinary of late so it ain't gonna work, buddy. I have no problem with the Indian team I have a problem with people like you who go around taking shots at everyone else when your team starts to do poorly I'm done talking, we'll settle this the next time your team comes here
Karan114 Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 I have no problem with the Indian team I have a problem with people like you who go around taking shots at everyone else when your team starts to do poorly I'm done talking, we'll settle this the next time your team comes here You're the one who turns up the moment India have a bad game and starts going on about "come on back here, Kallis wants another 200" - don't start crying when you are told some home truths about your team. That said, I don't have a problem with the SA team either - only with pathetic fans like yourself who come here to gloat.
Sehwag1830 Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 forgive my ignorance, but I believe that your no.1 team has yet to win a test series here when you manage that, I'll call you the no. 1 Fine. We will stop calling your team garbage when you will win a test series against any of the top 4 teams.
julianlev Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 You're the one who turns up the moment India have a bad game and starts going on about "come on back here' date=' Kallis wants another 200" - don't start crying when you are told some home truths about your team. That said, I don't have a problem with the SA team either - only with pathetic fans like yourself who come here to gloat.[/quote'] ok Im done talking right now, England are about 400 ahead of your team we'll talk after the match
Karan114 Posted July 24, 2011 Posted July 24, 2011 ok Im done talking right now, England are about 400 ahead of your team we'll talk after the match So now you're joining the English bandwagon? England may be 400 ahead of my team, but you haven't beaten my team in the last 3 series - how bad does that make your team, hey?
21cent Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 I guess it is time to give up the number one spot soon. So How does this work? Does England have to beat India 4-0 or somthing to get number one?
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 I guess it is time to give up the number one spot soon. So How does this work? Does England have to beat India 4-0 or somthing to get number one? Now, why don't you leave important matters to big boys and go play on your little island. Be careful, don't get bankrupt too soon, we just gave you dole of a few million dollars. Now you don't want to come back crawling again too soon, do you?
Cricket Tragic Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Now' date=' why don't you leave important matters to big boys and go play on your little island. Be careful, don't get bankrupt too soon, we just gave you dole of a few million dollars. Now you don't want to come back crawling again too soon, do you?[/quote'] :hysterical:
21cent Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Now' date=' why don't you leave important matters to big boys and go play on your little island. Be careful, don't get bankrupt too soon, we just gave you dole of a few million dollars. Now you don't want to come back crawling again too soon, do you?[/quote'] I wouldn't call the team that you beat by a fluke of a bowling performance by Sreesanth to gain the no.1 ranking, not a big boy:hysterical: Money wise I guess SLC is broke, but we are talking about cricket here, Aren't we?:giggle:
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 I wouldn't call the team that you beat by a fluke of a bowling performance by Sreesanth to gain the no.1 ranking, not a big boy:hysterical: Well you do seem to be in some trouble there dear chap. Here let me help. If India beat a "big boy" to become No.1, they must have done quite well and a rightly No.1 however on the other hand if India is not No.1 then SL must be a minnow. Which way would you like to go now?
wobblydoggy Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 If England beat India 3-1 and become supposed world number ones, I as an England fan will not consider us the true number ones until we have at least played India and South Afrika in their countries and at least got draws. Ranking should not be just about being great at home and against the minnows like Austrailia:haha:
Hell Raiser Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Well you do seem to be in some trouble there dear chap. Here let me help. If India beat a "big boy" to become No.1' date=' they must have done quite well and a rightly No.1 however on the other hand if India is not No.1 then SL must be a minnow. Which way would you like to go now?[/quote'] LOL................. Troll has been pawned.
21cent Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Well you do seem to be in some trouble there dear chap. Here let me help. If India beat a "big boy" to become No.1' date=' they must have done quite well and a rightly No.1 however on the other hand if India is not No.1 then SL must be a minnow. Which way would you like to go now?[/quote'] Well by definition of your "big boys", SL seemed to have been a big boy at that point. Whoever won that series would have become number 1. Anyways that was 1.5 years ago? Theses reults that happened 1.5 years ago has less worth in determining the current rankings. What we must mainly look at now is India's abysmal performance in WI (8th ranked team?) and now losing to engerland. Atleast when the SL minnows (They probably are minnows now after losing Murali and Malinga) were here they only lost due to a choke, but this match was never in India's grasp to begin with.:orderorder: So let me put it to you this way bro.. Do you really think a team that struggles to beat number 8th ranked team, gets whooped by a county side and never really puts up a fight against England deserve to be number 1?:hysterical:
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 If England beat India 3-1 and become supposed world number ones, I as an England fan will not consider us the true number ones until we have at least played India and South Afrika in their countries and at least got draws. Ranking should not be just about being great at home and against the minnows like Austrailia:haha: You have waited more than half your life to say that, haven't you? :haha::haha::haha:
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Well by definition of your "big boys", SL seemed to have been a big boy at that point. Whoever won that series would have become number 1. Anyways that was 1.5 years ago? Theses reults that happened 1.5 years ago has less worth in determining the current rankings. What we must mainly look at now is India's abysmal performance in WI (8th ranked team?) and now losing to engerland. Atleast when the SL minnows (They probably are minnows now after losing Murali and Malinga) were here they only lost due to a choke, but this match was never in India's grasp to begin with.:orderorder: So let me put it to you this way bro.. Do you really think a team that struggles to beat number 8th ranked team, gets whooped by a county side and never really puts up a fight against England deserve to be number 1?:hysterical: Long story short, SL was not a minnow 1.5 years ago and they are now. :haha: The rest is all irrelevant warbling. India hasn't lost this series or any other series since Aug 2008. Kthxbai.
21cent Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Long story short, SL was not a minnow 1.5 years ago and they are now. :haha: The rest is all irrelevant warbling. India hasn't lost this series or any other series since Aug 2008. Kthxbai. Sure SL is a minnow for now until they find a good bowling attack. But they still seemed to have done better than you lots in the recent Engerland series. What does that make india? worse than a minnow?:finger:
Guest Gunner Posted July 25, 2011 Posted July 25, 2011 Sure SL is a minnow for now until they find a good bowling attack. But they still seemed to have done better than you lots in the recent Engerland series. What does that make india? worse than a minnow?:finger: Give it up, move on. :haha::haha::haha::haha:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now