Shawn Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Should Praveen get a ban? is it time to rethink about HawkEye ? Discuss
Serani Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Hopefully he doesnt get banned, cant stand the thought of all the cries of racism.
CrazyCric Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Fine is enough , But seriously rethink about HE before being the laughing-stock . If BCCI is oposing to UDRS then players should not act in that way .Whole world is waiting to laugh . just my opinion
Shawn Posted July 29, 2011 Author Posted July 29, 2011 what happened?? Well, Praveen has stormed up to Umpire Erasmus at the end of the over and asked to know why that wasn't given out. He really looks rather angry. I don't like the look of this, Harbhajan Singh had to push Praveen away from the umpire. Praveen Kumar continues. He had an extended confrontation with the umpire in the last over, he just needs to keep his cool and keep plugging away. Arguing with the umpire won't get him anywhere.
VRV Singh Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Nah, but he needs to keep his head, we have enough temperamental retards in the attack. Went OTT
Shawn Posted July 29, 2011 Author Posted July 29, 2011 Saying no to Hawk-Eye & then having a go at umpires is plain stupid. He needs to cool down.
TheWall Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Saying no to Hawk-Eye & then having a go at umpires is plain stupid. He needs to cool down. I didn't know it was PKs decision...
Shawn Posted July 29, 2011 Author Posted July 29, 2011 I didn't know it was PKs decision... PK is playing for India, and it was India's decision.
gaurav92 Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Saying no to Hawk-Eye & then having a go at umpires is plain stupid. He needs to cool down. Absolutely. But coming back on topic, a fine would do him good, he really need to keep his cool.
TheWall Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 PK is playing for India' date=' and it was India's decision.[/quote'] Its a collective.. not an individual one....
NareshK Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Did Ponting get a ban ? He argued with the umpire for more than 5 minutes even after the DRS decision was overturned.
Trichromatic Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Level 1 The Offences set out at 1.1 to 1.7 below are Level 1 Offences. The penalty for a Level 1 Offence shall be an official reprimand and/or a fine of up to the equivalent of 50% of the Player or Official’s match fee (as determined in accordance with sections I (3) and I (4). 1.1 Breach of the Logo Policy save for breaches relating to a commercial logo or player’s bat logo as defined therein 1.2 Abuse of cricket equipment or clothing, ground equipment or fixtures and fittings 1.3 Showing dissent at an umpire’s decision. 1.4 Using language that is obscene, offensive or insulting and/or the making of an obscene gesture 1.5 Excessive appealing 1.6 Pointing or gesturing towards the pavilion in an aggressive manner by a bowler or other member of the fielding side upon the dismissal of a batsman. 1.7 Public criticism of, or inappropriate comment on a match related incident or match official. He should be guilty of level 1 offence. He won't be banned. Though it depends on umpires and referee to decide the nature of offence. Did Ponting get a ban ? He argued with the umpire for more than 5 minutes even after the DRS decision was overturned. Ponting was fined 40% of the match fee. Dhoni criticised the umpires in media. He was not reprimanded.
VRV Singh Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 PK is playing for India' date=' and it was India's decision.[/quote'] That's silly. Why not just rap him for showing dissent? Not everything needs HE or DRS brought into it. PK has jack all to do with that.
Shawn Posted July 29, 2011 Author Posted July 29, 2011 Broad was just about to snap at Lord's when he didn't get LBW decisions of Sachin & Raina. We've already seen 2 very frustrated bowlers having extended conversations with umpires just because available technology isn't used. I think it's better to use technology since it can get rid of obvious blunders. Waiting till it becomes perfect is nonsense because it will never be perfect.
Shawn Posted July 29, 2011 Author Posted July 29, 2011 Its a collective.. not an individual one.... Then he should have behaved like a team man That's silly. Why not just rap him for showing dissent? Not everything needs HE or DRS brought into it. PK has jack all to do with that. What's silly? Praveen wouldn't have gone out of control if HE was there. Thought that's pretty obvious.
Shawn Posted July 29, 2011 Author Posted July 29, 2011 In case you have misunderstood, I was just asking whether he should get a ban. Didn't say he should be banned.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now