Dravid decision

[ravsdh]

this is bloody ridiculous NOTHING on hot spot given out on a sound NO deflection visible Erasmus is clueless

[ravsdh]

the fact that snicko had a nick showing is irrelevant. he didnt have that available to him when he made the decision.

[CrazyCric]

Sniko shows it ,great decision at the end. I think there is a faint hotspot mark as well .id love to see a magnified frame of that.

[CrazyCric]

Right decision has been made ,stop complaining .

[gaurav92]

Although the correct decision has been made, but it is not fair to base the decision on something which is not the part of DRS - Snicko. The Hot Spot showed nothing and the umpire should have immediately said Not Out, but he didn't do that, which shows that not much importance is given to technology in use. Absolutely ridiculous. And its a shame that Dravid has been at the receiving end of both the decisions so far :((

[Trichromatic]

Rubbish decision.

[Cricket Tragic]

Pretty sure he hit it but there is no way that you can give that out based on the evidence available to the third umpire.

[Sid]

Whats the use of hotspot ,I m confused .

[ravsdh]

all those who said 'well snicko showed a nick' are moronic that WASNT available to the umpire

[gaurav92]

Sniko shows it ' date='great decision at the end. I think there is a faint hotspot mark as well .id love to see a magnified frame of that.[/quote'] Snicko is not a part of UDRS, so stop BSing. And it looks like only you have an eye and the others are blind. None of us saw any mark on the Hot Spot whatsoever, so stop posting BS

[Trichromatic]

Sniko shows it ' date='great decision at the end. I think there is a faint hotspot mark as well .id love to see a magnified frame of that.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Umpires don't have snicko. It might be correct decision, but was just a guess from umpire. Bad decision for sure. There was no hotspot mark. Don't spread false information.

[ravsdh]

Sniko shows it ' date='great decision at the end. I think there is a faint hotspot mark as well .id love to see a magnified frame of that.[/quote'] people like you really are clueless about international cricket

[zep1706]

To overturn on field decision you need proper evidence. This is guesswork. I am sure they wouldn't have given that out if it was an English batsman, not a conspiracy theorist but still something is really fishy here.

[CrazyCric]

Justice has done ,I think it was very very faint edge otherwise Dravid would have walked . I think the 3rd umpire made his decision based on the sound he heard in the real time video .I don't know if it can be used for DRS or not .

[CrazyCric]

It wasn't bad decision ,3rd umpire went with his gut feeling and he was right .Technology is there to help him at the same time he can use his brain too .Otherwise there is no point having a human to make that decision .

[zep1706]

Also hot spot need to be totally scrapped if they are not gonna rely on it. Only slight edges go for review, what's the use of hot spot if it can't pick up those. You don't need hot spot to see if the ball hits the middle of the bat. Now the failure of hot spot is apparent to eyes, what if Hawk Eye is equally faulty.

[Asoka]

Erasmus should be kicked out. Bloody South African wants British nationality.

[WC2011INDIA]

:finger: umpires

[zep1706]

It wasn't bad decision ' date='3rd umpire went with his gut feeling and he was right .Technology is there to help him at the same time he can use his brain too .Otherwise there is no point having a human to make that decision .[/quote'] Idiot, 3rd umpire can't go by his gut feeling when he's overturning an on field decision, he needs to have solid evidence.

[Trichromatic]

Justice has done ' date='I think it was very very faint edge otherwise Dravid would have walked . I think the 3rd umpire made his decision based on the sound he heard in the real time video .I don't know if it can be used for DRS or not .[/quote'] Sound is not the proper evidence as it can come from anywhere. Remember that shoelace incidence. It's like you fielder is running backwards and umpire give a batsman out by guessing he might have taken catch cleanly even if he can't see anything. In the end even if turns out to that fielder did take catch cleanly, it will remain rubbish decision.