Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking to buy new tv. Panasonic LX42 looks good at around 550£. But i can get a bigger plasma for the same price. There is a LG 42 inch 3D TV for maybe a few quids more. Although i loved 3D tv's (my office had one, for science ofcourse), i only watched animation movies in them. Besides that tv had active 3D and the LG TV has passive 3D.So for all the people with decent knowledge on the subject, Is it worth going 3D? The sky rep said that all the channels support 3D with the 3D pack but i am not sure if that is true. Even if it does, would it be a big change for HD? Note : Basic HD channels are 20£ while for 3d its 65£. Now down to Plasma Vs LED, i feel that LED TV's look better, so i am leaning towards that, but i am not sure about everything else like burn-in, reflections etc. Help me choose my TV.

Posted

Latest Plasmas don't have burn in problems, with a careful usage for the first 100 hours. If you have a light source (windows/lights) directly in front of TV, avoid Plasma. When it comes to picture quality LEDs can't match Plasma. You might find LEDs attractive because of the brightness, while Plasmas have better contrast and natural colors. For movies Plasma > LED For TV programs LED > Plasma Both technologies have their own advantages and disadvantages. So decide according to your requirements.

Posted
Latest Plasmas don't have burn in problems, with a careful usage for the first 100 hours. If you have a light source (windows/lights) directly in front of TV, avoid Plasma. When it comes to picture quality LEDs can't match Plasma. You might find LEDs attractive because of the brightness, while Plasmas have better contrast and natural colors. For movies Plasma > LED For TV programs LED > Plasma Both technologies have their own advantages and disadvantages. So decide according to your requirements.
n for kirkit?
×
×
  • Create New...