vishalvirsingh Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 Harris- wasnt he supposed to be there first Pacer even Ahead of Siddle and Pattinson and was way ahead of hifenhaus..........he was like what ZAK is for us......... I am So happy that he is not playing for Aussie's even he is fully fit..........possibly he loooks strong n fit as a Hige Beast of a bowler......... how many of u feel that INDIA got LUcky......i really feel our batters will love to face LYON any day in sydney and will definitely score at full Speed against Lyon to encash to the fulllest..... i wanna see how much Lyon bowls, knowing a bit of Clarke i feel Lyon may bowl less or very less only when pacers would be tired, possibly he may use Hussey and Lyon only to give some rest to his pacers.........
BestVRest Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 It don't matter that Harris is not playing, if India bat first at Sydney then they won't last long and after watching the Indians at the MCG it just shows that they are in big trouble on bouncy pitches. Sydney will provide plenty for the fast men on the first two days, even on the last three there will be bounce in the pitch, over the last two or three years Sydney has changed a lot.
chainsmoker1985 Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 Lyon will be a lottery bowler for India
TheWall Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 It don't matter that Harris is not playing, if India bat first at Sydney then they won't last long and after watching the Indians at the MCG it just shows that they are in big trouble on bouncy pitches. Sydney will provide plenty for the fast men on the first two days, even on the last three there will be bounce in the pitch, over the last two or three years Sydney has changed a lot. overall indians cannot bat on syndeny pitch on any given day...:nervous: GOD help us..
BestVRest Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 Melbourne wasn't that hard a track to bat on, but we all know what happened to the "world class" Indian line up on day four. Sydney will have bounce for most of the test and the Indians don't like the ball rising above the knees.
vishalvirsingh Posted January 2, 2012 Author Posted January 2, 2012 Lyon will be a lottery bowler for India if indian batsmen get thru the first 3 bowlers then they get this lottery bowler...
vishalvirsingh Posted January 2, 2012 Author Posted January 2, 2012 if indian batsmen get thru the first 3 bowlers then they get this lottery bowler... yes I am quite sure that this 4th bowler will definitely hurt Australia .............i am sure he will get to bowl a little and he will be thrashed for sure and finally the other 3 bowlers will have to bowl more..india has a chance.
vishalvirsingh Posted January 2, 2012 Author Posted January 2, 2012 yes I am quite sure that this 4th bowler will definitely hurt Australia .............i am sure he will get to bowl a little and he will be thrashed for sure and finally the other 3 bowlers will have to bowl more..india has a chance. ZAk =Siddle..both are equally good. Umesh and Pattinson..pattinson is a shade better than Umesh pattinson>umesh hifenhaus is a shade better than ishant only bcos he is much more accurate than ishu and bowling full..if ishant bowls full he will also become a great bowler...hilfenfaus>ishu BUT ASHWIN is way way better than LYON... So we loose in bowling..loose marginally.
vishalvirsingh Posted January 2, 2012 Author Posted January 2, 2012 ZAk =Siddle..both are equally good. Umesh and Pattinson..pattinson is a shade better than Umesh pattinson>umesh hifenhaus is a shade better than ishant only bcos he is much more accurate than ishu and bowling full..if ishant bowls full he will also become a great bowler...hilfenfaus>ishu BUT ASHWIN is way way better than LYON... So we loose in bowling..loose marginally. But I feel our batting is better than Australian batting provided Gambhir dravid vvs and kohli click.
chainsmoker1985 Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 if indian batsmen get thru the first 3 bowlers then they get this lottery bowler... Yes, thats the main point, they have see through first 3 fast bowlers without giving away many wickets. The same mistake they did at MCG. Lyon hardly bowled and Indian batsmen surrendered only in front of 3 fast bowlers. Jokers didn't use their mind a bit or didn't show any fight against fast bowlers at all
vishalvirsingh Posted January 3, 2012 Author Posted January 3, 2012 Yes' date=' thats the main point, they have see through first 3 fast bowlers without giving away many wickets. The same mistake they did at MCG. Lyon hardly bowled and Indian batsmen surrendered only in front of 3 fast bowlers. Jokers didn't use their mind a bit or didn't show any fight against fast bowlers at all[/quote'] yes ....the golden OLDIES are not good stroke Makers now( with the exception of Sachin).......VVS is past his Prime and it seems he cannot even play 142 K full length bowling of Siddle.. not once did he look convincing and all the 3 innings he has played he has hardly managed to face 5 to 6 balls.......it is very very disgusting as VVS hardly staying for 6 balls....... Gauti has stayed longer but looks like a DUCK..........Rohit should replace him soon. Kohli was looking Great while he was batting and scored some 21 + and looked in getting into form when he got a real Good ball to get him OUT. Gauti got out foolishly...he should have played that ball safely towards the leg side............
daryl1985 Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 ZAk =Siddle..both are equally good. Umesh and Pattinson..pattinson is a shade better than Umesh pattinson>umesh hifenhaus is a shade better than ishant only bcos he is much more accurate than ishu and bowling full..if ishant bowls full he will also become a great bowler...hilfenfaus>ishu BUT ASHWIN is way way better than LYON... So we loose in bowling..loose marginally. I would say Pattinson is quite a bit better than Umesh atm. He is an amzing prospect (Umesh is a very good prospect). No way is Siddle as good as Zak. IMO Zak is our most important player (when we play in the Subcontinent Sehwag is equally important).
ViruRulez Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 They do not need any more bowler. Even if they bring Vinay Kumar against us we will suck. As simple as that. Something is wrong with the batsmen as of now.
adi B Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 the problem with india is that our bowlers dont bowl consistently in the right areas i.e pitched up most of the time.....their bowlers mostly pitched up nd bowled consistently in those areas nd look at the results consistently ...add harris to that line up nd india will be screwed even more....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now