What's the problem with the subcontinent?

[jairamesh]

he isn't racist. he is just an india basher. maybe he has an indian milk man? :nervous:

:haha:

[deathmonger]

You can't dominate everything' date=' Cricket I'll do for now.[/quote'] You don't even dominate cricket. You suck in ODIs and suck in the subcontinent.

[jairamesh]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sport/cricket/england_v_new_zealand/427262.stm

August 1999. :hehe: ^^^^^^ :hysterical:

[Stan AF]

:hysterical:

Unfortunately South Africa isn't that good at football too.

[special K]

he isn't racist. he is just an india basher. maybe he has an indian milk man? :nervous:

I'm just stating facts, no bashing just facts.. I buy milk from a shop anway.

[Number]

August 1999. :hehe: ^^^^^^ :hysterical:

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[Sundar88]

You can't dominate everything' date=' Cricket I'll do for now.[/quote'] Being the no.1 rated team in one format of Cricket for 4 months cannot be considered "dominating" though lol, India were no.1 for almost 2 years but many people felt their true test would be when they played outside the subcontinent. Similarly England played majority of their matches in England and in countries like Australia and South Africa where conditions are similar to England, their true test will come when they tour the subcontinent. As far as ODI cricket is concerned England have never been good at it anyway. The only dominant teams in Cricket were the West Indian team of the 80's and the Australian teams of the latter 90's and 2000's.

[ganeshran]

Deathmonger, please calm down. racist posts are strictly not allowed.