Rajiv Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 Was browsing through Ind-Eng archives in criinfo and boy were we royally spanked in 74 series, but on home soil..how freaking heatbreaking was this http://www.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/1970S/1979/IND_IN_ENG/IND_ENG_T4_30AUG-04SEP1979.html We could have been the only team to chase over 400 twice P.S What really happened there, we were short by 9 runs and there were 2 wickets in hand? Link to comment
observer1 Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 I remember listening to it on 9740KhZ - it was a stunning last day. I have pasted a bit from cricinfo with some bits in bold. At 76 for no wicket on the fifth morning, India wanted roughly a run a minute. Their rate was never brisk - 48 in the first hour, 45 in the second, and 44 in the third. England were desparing of wickets when, after five and a quarter hours, Chauhan edged Willis. The despair soon returned as Vengsarkar joined Gavaskar in an accelerating stand which produced 153 at better than a run a minute. Gavaskar masterminded the show, doing all the thinking and playing most of the shots. Tea came at 304 for one and, after a mere six overs between the interval and five o'clock - England ruthlessly slowed down the game - the last twenty overs began at 328 for one with 100 wanted, and India favourites. Gavaskar's memorable innings lasted eight hours, nine minutes and he hit 21 4's, most of them coming from firm clips past mid-wicket and his unexpectedlay powerful cover-drive. However, his cool control of the developing crisis was missed by India as much as his runs. Viswanath unneringly found one of the widely spaced fielders, as had Vengsarkar and Gavaskar. Then Botham firmly ended India's hopes by having Yajurvindra Singh and Yashpal Sharma lbw in successive overs and, in between, making a slick stop to run out Venkataraghavan. Botham's final four overs brought him an absolutely crucial three for 17. A target of 15 from the last over was too much, and the climax came with fielders encircling the bat. Link to comment
Gambit Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 The captain, Venkat, made an error by promoting Kapil over Vishy in order to finish the game off quickly. The move backfired as Kapil and everyone after him failed. But what a knock from SunnyG! Link to comment
The Outsider Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 Great knock by Gavaskar. England also cut down their over rate drastically towards the end. Link to comment
gator Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 The captain' date=' Venkat, made an error by promoting Kapil over Vishy in order to finish the game off quickly. The move backfired as Kapil and everyone after him failed. But what a knock from SunnyG![/quote'] i dont know, if i would call it an error.... in those days, Kapil was our only finisher... until Ravi joined him a few years later... we had the guys who could really step up the gas, only after 90s... with the advent of jadeja, Robin et al... Link to comment
Gambit Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 i dont know' date=' if i would call it an error.... in those days, Kapil was our only finisher... until Ravi joined him a few years later... we had the guys who could really step up the gas, only after 90s... with the advent of jadeja, Robin et al...[/quote'] LOL, I did sound as if I watched the match live. What I said is what I read in 'A history of Indian Cricket' by Mihir Bose. In the book, during the post mortem, most people felt that Vishy should have come in. Link to comment
Rajiv Posted June 27, 2008 Author Share Posted June 27, 2008 ..just this knock on Cricketfirst, what class batting by Gavaskar..and yes 2 wickets and 15 needed of last over...compare it to todays era.,.they would have gone for it Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Wow what a knock from Sunny. Link to comment
THX_1138 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 is this the only double century in the fourth innings by a batsman, let alone an opener? my limited knowledge of cricket suggests it is indeed... Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now