200+ match aggregate in wins

[Khalpat]

Probably' date=' UG meant something like this - [url']http://stats.espncricinfo.com/india/content/records/283999.html PS - Some more filtering required.

You know what the best part about that statistics, the person at the top of chart played the first ball ever in test cricket and the match is the first ever test match played.

[Crookbond]

You know what the best part about that statistics' date=' the person at the top of chart played the first ball ever in test cricket and the match is the first ever test match played.[/quote'] Read my PS. I just wanted to clarify hence, said "something like this".

[Crookbond]

interesting..we have to check manually how many resulted in win? is there a way to find out?

Need to do some Statsguru and perform slice-dice.

[yoda]

Dude you have descended to pathethic levels lately. The question everyone has is not why Sachin is not there. the question is' date=' when Dravid is so low in the list, why is this a tribute thread. In fact, its an insult to Dravid to put him along with Inzi[/quote'] :facepalm:

[vvvslaxman]

:facepalm:

:cantstop: ...

[Ultimate_Game]

You mean something like this http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63587.html oops sorry out before again I am called as Bhakth

Yup something like this across all wins for a team. Would really be interested to see who scored the highest %ge of team runs in a win.

[Ultimate_Game]

Probably' date=' UG meant something like this - [url']http://stats.espncricinfo.com/india/content/records/283999.html PS - Some more filtering required.

Yup, the same thing but runs/%ge of runs aggregated across all wins.

[yoda]

:cantstop: ...

I donno whose worse, these fanatics who bring up Sachin out of nowhere, or the super-fanatics who are ready to jump in a mindless defense when one of their fellow fanatics is called out.