India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 How dare Lara question the credibility of sophisticated mathematical models such as RPT. crickets chirping wtf did i just read?
DomainK Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Brian Lara- " whoever I have spoken to who have seen very old players in action, they believe that he (Bradman) would not have averaged 99 in today's cricket." :hysterical: barely holds the bat properly in this vid lol Lara means he would have averaged .94 less? Why?
India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Lara means he would have averaged .94? Why? fixed typo :two_thumbs_up:
rkt.india Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Those who don't think 100 100s > an avg of 100 are all Aussie bhakts and drool on anything videshi :orderorder: For national pride, say "100 100s are better" :isalute: This.:two_thumbs_up:
rkt.india Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Even though I do not agree with the comparison. Let me just state this: Great sportsmen break old records/milestones, greatest ones create new ones for others to break. WG created 100 FC centuries, Don created 99.94, SRT (media) created 100 international 100s (and counting). It is not sensible to compare these with each other, all these reflect/represent different things. :agree:
Crookbond Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Even though I do not agree with the comparison. Let me just state this: Great sportsmen break old records/milestones, greatest ones create new ones for others to break. WG created 100 FC centuries, Don created 99.94, SRT (media) created 100 international 100s (and counting). It is not sensible to compare these with each other, all these reflect/represent different things. Finally! :clap: Any sensible cricket lover would agree apart from a narcissist.
Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Oh Man.. No more comparison threads. End date of my project is fast approaching.
India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Lara is right he wouldn't have averaged 99 today because he wouldn't have been picked :hysterical:
Ponka Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 If you say Tendulkar 100 100 > Bradman 99.99 average then you are also saying Tendulkar's selfishness > Bradman's team man ability
India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 If you say Tendulkar 100 100 > Bradman 99.99 average then you are also saying Tendulkar's selfishness > Bradman's team man ability haven't u read the sticky above? NO TROLLING! Serious discussions only :hitler:
rabinjackman Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 If you say Tendulkar 100 100 > Bradman 99.99 average then you are also saying Tendulkar's selfishness > Bradman's team man ability No! YOU are making that one up :hehe:
India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 If you say Tendulkar 100 100 > Bradman 99.99 average then you are also saying Tendulkar's selfishness > Bradman's team man ability ^obvious troll is obvious this phaggot played against 1 team against bowlers slower than Kerala Express (125kph). Watch the video, he barely holds a bat properly. Of course he is better than SRT :giggle:
Sir_Afridi Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 How many great bastmen can achieve 100 tons? All of these Ponting, Lara, Kallis, Younis, Inzi, Dravid, Pieterson, Cook and many others can match Tendulkar feat if they play as many games as sachin. None of them including Tendulkar can come close to Bradman average even if they keep on playing for ever. So which feat is greater? I rest my case
India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Cricket before 1970 was irrelevant and doesnt count. blah blah blah... I rest my case +1 :hatsoff:
Ponka Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 No! YOU are making that one up :hehe: Just like KT made the OP up. When the original posts are ridiculous, similar ridiculous response should follow.
India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 :facepalm: I know right? Angus Fraser is captain obvious.
Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 How many great bastmen can achieve 100 tons? All of these Ponting, Lara, Kallis, Younis, Inzi, Dravid, Pieterson, Cook and many others can match Tendulkar feat if they play as many games as sachin. None of them including Tendulkar can come close to Bradman average even if they keep on playing for ever. So which feat is greater? I rest my case I guess even Afridi. Isn't it?
akshayxyz Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 How many great bastmen can achieve 100 tons? All of these Ponting, Lara, Kallis, Younis, Inzi, Dravid, Pieterson, Cook and many others can match Tendulkar feat if they play as many games as sachin. None of them including Tendulkar can come close to Bradman average even if they keep on playing for ever. So which feat is greater? I rest my case Who is stopping them?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now