Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
You have 90% behind you. Go do what you like to..Who can challenge you?
That makes you a smart @.ass? What a fool! :giggle::giggle:
Posted

Justice Katju is too honest to hold his position for too long. He's been blunt in his assessments about the media, government and now the people. This guy gets my respect :bow: I'm glad we still have people like him around in the system. :isalute:

Posted
Justice Katju is too honest to hold his position for too long. He's been blunt in his assessments about the media, government and now the people. This guy gets my respect :bow: I'm glad we still have people like him around in the system. :isalute:
I for one think he is in the habit of blabbering and making OTT generalizations whenever he gets in front of a mike.
Posted
What they know is the bill can stop corruption' date=' why do they need to know the whole philosophy of the bill? Its because of that support that the bill has reached somewhere.[/quote'] Anna talks about transparency, right? On what basis do you support the bill if you don't know what it is about? How do you know it will stop corruption? HOW do YOU know whether it is better than the current bill? HOW do you know whether the people who are allotted are not corrupt? You need to know about the bill before supporting it. When you don't know what is in there, how can you decide whether it is right or wrong?
Posted
I for one think he is in the habit of blabbering and making OTT generalizations whenever he gets in front of a mike.
It is made to look that way. (Eg: Today's news reports that RD mentioned everyone but SRT, with a possible negative intent in mind). If we look at what he says purely on merit, there isn't much wrong about it. Yes, calling 90% Indians as idiots being an Indian sitting in India is risky, yes. But we must admire him for his courage to talk about things we generally restrict to tea-parties.
Posted
Anna talks about transparency, right? On what basis do you support the bill if you don't know what it is about? How do you know it will stop corruption? HOW do YOU know whether it is better than the current bill? HOW do you know whether the people who are allotted are not corrupt? You need to know about the bill before supporting it. When you don't know what is in there, how can you decide whether it is right or wrong?
Don't have too much knowledge of this so don't quote me but from what I know too much corruption in country. MPs especially, and look at the military as another example. Buying cheaper lesser quality weapons and the remaining money from budget is taken by those who were supposed to buy it. Im not sure about this but I think part of this bill is there will be a committee which allows investigation without permission (usually this is the reason there is none) into such cases and can also press charges if evidence of corruption is found. Currently this type of committee doesn't exist. It would be step in the right direction to stop corruption. Currently no such cases are given permission for investigation (mostly).
Posted
Don't have too much knowledge of this so don't quote me but from what I know too much corruption in country. MPs especially' date=' and look at the military as another example. Buying cheaper lesser quality weapons and the remaining money from budget is taken by those who were supposed to buy it. Im not sure about this but I think[b'] part of this bill is there will be a committee which allows investigation without permission (usually this is the reason there is none) into such cases and can also press charges if evidence of corruption is found. Currently this type of committee doesn't exist. It would be step in the right direction to stop corruption. Currently no such cases are given permission for investigation (mostly).
Exactly. And what guarantee does Anna give us that they will not be Corrupt? Any person who gets power is MOSTLY (not always) bound to get corrupt.
Posted
Exactly. And what guarantee does Anna give us that they will not be Corrupt? Any person who gets power is MOSTLY (not always) bound to get corrupt.
Well such committees are usually reliable, but im not sure what damage they could do even if they did misuse their power. Better than letting corruption occur and do nothing about it, atm Mps etc have no fear, they know no one will investigate...
Posted

^ No. All it will do is add one more group of people who will need to be bribed in order for the corrupt to carry on doing what they've been doing.

Posted
^ No. All it will do is add one more group of people who will need to be bribed in order for the corrupt to carry on doing what they've been doing.
As I said don't quote me but I think there is currently no committee which can investigate independently without permission. It's not that they are bribed, such groups can't get permission, always delays and nothing happens... This committee will have more power because of that. On the other hand (bill not passed) it will continue and nothing will change...
Posted
As I said don't quote me but I think there is currently no committee which can investigate independently without permission. It's not that they are bribed, such groups can't get permission, always delays and nothing happens... This committee will have more power bribe because of that. FTFY
On the other hand it will continue and nothing will change...
this.
×
×
  • Create New...