Lurker Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Wealth is relative' date=' but for me the primary difference between WSC and IPL is the emphasis on the core skills and format of cricket. IPL is played in a joke T20 format among 9-10 teams selected mainly from mediocre players whereas WSC cricket had a good mix of test matches and one day matches and was confined to 3 teams representing top notch talent from around the world, so much so that a lot of players involved in it call it the best and most competitive cricket they have played.[/quote'] Thats a very fair point. The cricket played in WSC was one of the very best seen ever. The only thing missing however was no coverage ala - That's a DLF maximum!!! Okay scratch that. Funny how people have a go at WSC without appreciating the cricket. There are days when I look at the scorecard and have to marvel at the teams and the game. IPL has been going on forver, when was the last time you checked the scorecard? I know I havent:nervous:
Vilander Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 I am no fan of Tony Greig - quite the contrary. However, that is a separate discussion and if you ask me someone who went on rebel tours implicitly supporting apartheid and who lured young cricketers into the ICL without even making an effort or guaranteeing that they were paid up later, should not have been giving the MCC spirit of cricket lecture. Even in his speech I find quite a few things which don't make sense, my amusement stems from the way my internet humvatanzzz react to such things. Guys like Greig and Vaughan, I believe, take the mickey out of such people deliberately by posting and quoting things to needle them and sit back and enjoy the fun. what do you propose ? let them spread the misinformation, its not obvious if he is trolling, i think he is venting his frustrations on BCCI, since he has substantial personal enmity against bcci, he seems to have a pseudo india lover ring going in his speech as well, but he betrays his india hating self when he lists " Indian super stars embarrassing themselves with udrs" as a reason for bcci being against UDRS.
Lurker Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 :haha: Glad you guys posted on this thread. The cartoon you posted summed it all very well I thought. A picture is worth a 1000 words and all that...
Sehwag1830 Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Once again people how can we question the person who has more integrity than Tendulkar and a better ODI cricketer than Dhoni. Let us sit back and listen to his sermons as a lesser mortals.
Vilander Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Well bro I read your comments and agree before it gets deleted. The main issue everyone has with the BCCI is that its making money (thru Indian sponsors and Indian TV viewers) but is not sharing it with the whole world and subsidise their DRS. quite true..its very obvious that all this is very rich and ingenuin.
Sehwag1830 Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 I think India already contributed 230 million $ last year to ICC revenue . Will ICC invest that money in India .
Precambrian Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Once again people how can we question the person who has more integrity than Tendulkar and a better ODI cricketer than Dhoni. Let us sit back and listen to his sermons as a lesser mortals. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Number Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Once again people how can we question the person who has more integrity than Tendulkar and a better ODI cricketer than Dhoni. Let us sit back and listen to his sermons as a lesser mortals. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: though he never claimed what you've written in the bold part.
jj_28 Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 I dont understand what the big deal is with these guy For whatever reason India doesn't want the DRS system if you are a nation that does want it and think cricket definitely needs it then BOYCOTT us Put pressure on us this way and make us change our mind but dont try to teach us RIGHT OR WRONG These same people who think we are bullies now never raised a finger when these things were happening to us on a regular basis. BCCI has a point of view and they have the right to stick with it INDIA CAN DO AS IT PLEASES ITS NOT FORCING ANYONE ELSE TO FOLLOW IT LIKE THESE GUYS DID IN THE PAST
Sehwag1830 Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: though he never claimed what you've written in the bold part. Well he called Dhoni a mediocre cricketer didn't he ? Dhoni just twirled around bat in WC final. Funny thing he rated Boucher above Dhoni who neither is a great test player or great ODI player. I would pick Dhoni over Boucher anyday of the week in any format. If you missed the greatness of Nayan Mongia, read his post.
Precambrian Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Well he called Dhoni a mediocre cricketer didn't he ? Dhoni just twirled around bat in WC final. Funny thing he rated Boucher above Dhoni who neither is a great test player or great ODI player. I would pick Dhoni over Boucher anyday of the week in any format. If you missed the greatness of Nayan Mongia, read his post. Dont get so obsessed... he's just an idiot who's trying to get some attn
saket123 Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 I've said this before and I'll say it again.. Cricket more and more is becoming about rules and regulation and less and less about actually playing cricket or making it easier on the players. This is very typical of Nanny government administrations where government tells you what to do and what to think. Taking up or not wanting to take up UDRS has NOTHING to do with the "spirit of cricket"... Tomorrow these control freaks will come up with a new rule about cricket body implementing a surcharge tax on individual players' income.. and if you protest.. you'll be called "not in line with the spirit of the game"... BS. Cricket is NOT about getting 100% correct decisions all the time using technology.. it is about striving to get 100% correct decisions using Human Skills.. and since that is impossible.. it is about working in the Human errors and mistakes as part of the game. What next? Robotic fielders should be allowed because they are more efficient? Completely replace umpires with computers in all games so that there are practically zero errors?? This is typical socialistic crap where they go over-board with their need for perfection that they forget the basics of human dynamics or the importance of keeping something basic and simple as it was meant to be. Yea Human beings and umpires are not perfect.. but that is perfectly fine.
Vilander Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Dont get so obsessed... he's just an idiot who's trying to get some attn its a little more sinister than that. If you look at his tweets, he is covering sl vs pak i suppose, he wants to suck up to them, so all this affection towards them. He does not care about his rapport with bcci cause its non existent so is trying hard to malign India.
goggi Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Completely agree with Tony Grieg. Especially the bit where BCCI needs to show global leadership in one way or another. BCCI despite it's wealth is a very half-hearted group at getting things done. The lack of strength to push things through is very evident at not being able to put issues to bed at these frills-n-fun ICC gatherings. BCCI should be leading the world of cricket and go one up over the English/Aussie way of bias running of cricket. BCCI should financially help out boards where required, promote cricket, make cricket no.1 rather than profits.
Zap_Brannigan Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Completely agree with Tony Grieg. Especially the bit where BCCI needs to show global leadership in one way or another. BCCI despite it's wealth is a very half-hearted group at getting things done. The lack of strength to push things through is very evident at not being able to put issues to bed at these frills-n-fun ICC gatherings. BCCI should be leading the world of cricket and go one up over the English/Aussie way of bias running of cricket. BCCI should financially help out boards where required, promote cricket, make cricket no.1 rather than profits. Absolutely!!They should take a leaf out of England and Aus when they ruled. From now on, 1. BCCI should have veto powers on everything ICC decides. We should actually go one up and have 2 veto powers just in case pawar wants to go against srinivasan. 2. We should remove the rule to pay 10% of all foreign player signing to their respective boards. Eng never did it in counties nor do any other T20 league does it now. 3. All WC from now on will take place only in India. Not even SL and BD should expect to stage the WC. 4. Lets also not ask NOC from players. If they want to play in IPL, let them come without any hassle. 5. BCCI should get 70% of ICC's profit. 6. We should play 75% of our games at home and play 75% of our games against Aus, Eng and SA. 7. We should also make it more spinner friendly or change rules to help our team just like Eng introduced the bouncer rule.
goggi Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 ^^^:two_thumbs_up: Nice one, people say ICC need to grow a pair. TBH, BCCI need to grow a pair to stamp their authority. What's the worst that's going to happen? England breakaway to play by themselves, good riddance.
MechEng Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 I've said this before and I'll say it again.. Cricket more and more is becoming about rules and regulation and less and less about actually playing cricket or making it easier on the players. This is very typical of Nanny government administrations where government tells you what to do and what to think. Taking up or not wanting to take up UDRS has NOTHING to do with the "spirit of cricket"... Tomorrow these control freaks will come up with a new rule about cricket body implementing a surcharge tax on individual players' income.. and if you protest.. you'll be called "not in line with the spirit of the game"... BS. Cricket is NOT about getting 100% correct decisions all the time using technology.. it is about striving to get 100% correct decisions using Human Skills.. and since that is impossible.. it is about working in the Human errors and mistakes as part of the game. What next? Robotic fielders should be allowed because they are more efficient? Completely replace umpires with computers in all games so that there are practically zero errors?? This is typical socialistic crap where they go over-board with their need for perfection that they forget the basics of human dynamics or the importance of keeping something basic and simple as it was meant to be. Yea Human beings and umpires are not perfect.. but that is perfectly fine. This.
Crookbond Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 Tony Greig has no cause to feel anything but proud about his involvement with World Series Cricket - as seminal a turning point as any the game has seen http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/570263.html "Kerry, money is not my major concern. I'm nearly 31 and probably two or three Test failures from being dropped by England. Ian Botham is going to be a great player and there won't be room in the side for both of us. England captains such as Brian Close, Ray Illingworth and Colin Cowdrey lost the captaincy before they expected. I don't want to finish up in a mundane job when they drop me. I'm not trained to do anything. I went straight from school to playing for Sussex. My family's future is more important than anything else. If you guarantee me a job for life working for your organization, I will sign." - Tony Greig
Precambrian Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 Tony Greig has no cause to feel anything but proud about his involvement with World Series Cricket - as seminal a turning point as any the game has seen http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/570263.html - Tony Greig LMAO - does he understand how contradictory is that? He does not want money, but he wants money because a. He thinks he is **** and going to get dropped from Ind team. b. He is not skilled in anything else. c. He has got a family to provide for. Well, that'd be exactly what 99.99% of cricketers who opt for T20 instead of tests would say. we need money to fund our needs, not to sit on.
Zap_Brannigan Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 LMAO - does he understand how contradictory is that? He does not want money, but he wants money because a. He thinks he is **** and going to get dropped from Ind team. b. He is not skilled in anything else. c. He has got a family to provide for. Well, that'd be exactly what 99.99% of cricketers who opt for T20 instead of tests would say. we need money to fund our needs, not to sit on. Thats exactly how the whole world works. But hey, the cricketers should sacrifice their potential to earn and adhere to idiots like tony's opinion. The amount of ignorance, stupidity and hypocrisy in cricinfo and in its comments is just insane. Does even one of them stop and think, what if they were in the other person's shoes?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now