Jump to content

Irfan Pathan The Allrounder Watch Thread


CG

Recommended Posts

Posted

Possible all rounder when we play 5 bowlers on flat pitches. Not convinced of his bowling. You have to bowl most his overs at the beginning due to risk of slogging. Also when he is up against aggressive openers, he really is easy to hit I think. He doesn't respond well when he is attacked. His yorkers become 120kmph full tosses e.t.c Bowled reasonably well yesterday. His figures look good. But bear in mind he bowled most his overs at the beginning and with SL chasing a huge total-they were cautious at the start. Unfair to say he bowled better than ZK and Yadav. ZK is not what he was and Yadav is wayward anyway so pointless comparing him to them. Lets see him bowl well when India bowl first on these pitches. Will he bowl well at the beginning and at the death? Hope so but not sure...

Posted

^^^^ Nevertheless he will be the key for us in WC 2015. I honestly don't see us getting into semis without Irfan. We will need a pace all-rounder as in Aus pitches you can't have likes of Sehwag, Raina, Rohit etc. bowling 10 overs. You will need to have Irfan as a backup bowler supporting the likes of Ishant, Umesh & Aaron (don't think Zak will be around). Plus he is a pretty good batsman lower down the order compared to the likes of Jadeja in Aus conditions.

Posted
Possible all rounder when we play 5 bowlers on flat pitches. Not convinced of his bowling. You have to bowl most his overs at the beginning due to risk of slogging. Also when he is up against aggressive openers, he really is easy to hit I think. He doesn't respond well when he is attacked. His yorkers become 120kmph full tosses e.t.c Bowled reasonably well yesterday. His figures look good. But bear in mind he bowled most his overs at the beginning and with SL chasing a huge total-they were cautious at the start. Unfair to say he bowled better than ZK and Yadav. ZK is not what he was and Yadav is wayward anyway so pointless comparing him to them. Lets see him bowl well when India bowl first on these pitches. Will he bowl well at the beginning and at the death? Hope so but not sure...
Openers do not come much more aggressive than Dilshan who did not find him easy to hit yesterday. Why would Sri Lanka start cautiously when they were chasing a big total. We can't compare his bowling performance to the other fast bowlers in the team because he bowled most of his overs at the start but if we did it would be pointless as one of the bowlers is not as good as he once was and the other is wayward? Strange post from you Mr DTW
Posted
Possible all rounder when we play 5 bowlers on flat pitches. Not convinced of his bowling. You have to bowl most his overs at the beginning due to risk of slogging. Also when he is up against aggressive openers, he really is easy to hit I think. He doesn't respond well when he is attacked. His yorkers become 120kmph full tosses e.t.c Bowled reasonably well yesterday. His figures look good. But bear in mind he bowled most his overs at the beginning and with SL chasing a huge total-they were cautious at the start. Unfair to say he bowled better than ZK and Yadav. ZK is not what he was and Yadav is wayward anyway so pointless comparing him to them. Lets see him bowl well when India bowl first on these pitches. Will he bowl well at the beginning and at the death? Hope so but not sure...
Yes, even I agree here .. he was good yesterday but its the conditions in lanka that favours his swing .. Good bet for T20 WC .. we have to see how he perfroms back in India to see if we can invest in him for 2015 WC
Posted
Openers do not come much more aggressive than Dilshan who did not find him easy to hit yesterday. Why would Sri Lanka start cautiously when they were chasing a big total. We can't compare his bowling performance to the other fast bowlers in the team because he bowled most of his overs at the start but if we did it would be pointless as one of the bowlers is not as good as he once was and the other is wayward? Strange post from you Mr DTW
SL approach was to keep wickets in hand. It is a common misconception that you must slog when chasing a big score. On the contrary, you want a solidish platform and NOT lose wickets. That's actually the key. I wasn't impressed with his bowling. Yes he got swing but I just don't rate him. I used to back in the day when he first came on. He is too bits and pieces for me.
Posted
Yes' date=' even I agree here .. he was good yesterday but its the conditions in lanka that favours his swing .. Good bet for T20 WC .. we have to see how he perfroms back in India to see if we can invest in him for 2015 WC[/quote'] Oh yeah for T20, you need a couple of utility players like him. But remember in IPL in last two years he has been one of the most expensive bowlers I think.
Posted
^^^^ Nevertheless he will be the key for us in WC 2015. I honestly don't see us getting into semis without Irfan. We will need a pace all-rounder as in Aus pitches you can't have likes of Sehwag, Raina, Rohit etc. bowling 10 overs. You will need to have Irfan as a backup bowler supporting the likes of Ishant, Umesh & Aaron (don't think Zak will be around). Plus he is a pretty good batsman lower down the order compared to the likes of Jadeja in Aus conditions.
lol at the bold bit. Actually on those kind of pitches we will play the extra batsman-it's the Indian tried and tested method. As Kohli just said yesterday-on flat pitches we can bank on 6 batsmen and 5 bowlers including a bowling all rounder. So he was basically saying that on pitches outside SC we would play 7 batsmen and 4 bowlers. This is the traditional Indian approach of batting protection outside the SC. In WC 2003 we did the same and that was in SA-it works well. No7 will be a batsmen or at most a batting all rounder who bowls part time. Someone like Rohit or Yusuf. It's a long time way but I think that will be the approach. If Irfan wants to play in that WC he will have to play as a genuine bowler. He won't be no7. Part timers work well when you use them at the right time, like the fall of a wicket e.t.c and also if you have a powerful batting lineup to back them which we do have. Our part timers are ok in 50 over cricket, they have had to learn to bowl few overs. UV has become more than a part timer.
Posted
Yes' date=' even I agree here .. he was good yesterday but its the conditions in lanka that favours his swing .. Good bet for T20 WC .. we have to see how he perfroms back in India to see if we can invest in him for 2015 WC[/quote'] So SL is not the right place to make a call on Pathan but performance in India is going to tell us whether he will be useful on Aus pitches :omg: What next? Since Jaddu will be fairly useful in Indian conditions shall we take him to Aus for the WC?
Posted

The cycle once again begins, Crapthan starts brain washing people with a good performance here and there, cements himself into the side, then the slide once again begins and he is exposed for the club cricketer that he is. Gap of a couple of years out of the national side and rinse and repeat :facepalm:

Posted
The cycle once again begins, Crapthan starts brain washing people with a good performance here and there, cements himself into the side, then the slide once again begins and he is exposed for the club cricketer that he is. Gap of a couple of years out of the national side and rinse and repeat :facepalm:
This what I mean. I fully agree with you btw. It's similar to when a crap batsman scores 50 and you know it will extend his run in the team before he can be dropped again.
Posted
So SL is not the right place to make a call on Pathan but performance in India is going to tell us whether he will be useful on Aus pitches :omg: What next? Since Jaddu will be fairly useful in Indian conditions shall we take him to Aus for the WC?
No performance in India wont tell us if he is good enough for Australia .. It will tell us if his swing has actually returned .. he already played in Australia this year and was decent. The swing he got yesterday I feel is due to the conditions in sri lanka. If he gets the swing back in India as well and be a little consistent only then he can be a fixed selection in our team. Plus after this series we dont have many away tours till another one and a half year hence we can only test him in India.
Posted
lol at the bold bit. Actually on those kind of pitches we will play the extra batsman-it's the Indian tried and tested method. As Kohli just said yesterday-on flat pitches we can bank on 6 batsmen and 5 bowlers including a bowling all rounder. So he was basically saying that on pitches outside SC we would play 7 batsmen and 4 bowlers. This is the traditional Indian approach of batting protection outside the SC. In WC 2003 we did the same and that was in SA-it works well. No7 will be a batsmen or at most a batting all rounder who bowls part time. Someone like Rohit or Yusuf. It's a long time way but I think that will be the approach. If Irfan wants to play in that WC he will have to play as a genuine bowler. He won't be no7. Part timers work well when you use them at the right time, like the fall of a wicket e.t.c and also if you have a powerful batting lineup to back them which we do have. Our part timers are ok in 50 over cricket, they have had to learn to bowl few overs. UV has become more than a part timer.
In that case I am fine with Irfan batting at 8 adding more depth to our batting but either way he wuld be a key player for us in a place like Aus. At this point my WC team would be... Sehwag/Rahane Gambhir Kohli Rohit Yuvraj Dhoni Raina Irfan Ashwin Ishant Umesh (or maybe replace Rohit with Awana or any of the leading pacer at the time).
Posted
In that case I am fine with Irfan batting at 8 adding more depth to our batting but either way he wuld be a key player for us in a place like Aus. At this point my WC team would be... Sehwag/Rahane Gambhir Kohli Rohit Yuvraj Dhoni Raina Irfan Ashwin Ishant Umesh (or maybe replace Rohit with Awana or any of the leading pacer at the time).
WC 2015 is a long way away .. I bet you will change your team 30 times before the WC comes.
Posted
No performance in India wont tell us if he is good enough for Australia .. It will tell us if his swing has actually returned .. he already played in Australia this year and was decent. The swing he got yesterday I feel is due to the conditions in sri lanka. If he gets the swing back in India as well and be a little consistent only then he can be a fixed selection in our team. Plus after this series we dont have many away tours till another one and a half year hence we can only test him in India.
But if he was decent in Aus, where the WC will be played, and was able to swing in SL under lights, don't you think he will be an asset in Aus especially when we defend under the lights? He clearly adds more to the team than someone like Jadeja or spin based all-rounders. In Aus you need to have 3-4 pacers and I am sure Pathan is good enough to be one of those 3-4 pacers especially considering his lower order batting.
Posted
WC 2015 is a long way away .. I bet you will change your team 30 times before the WC comes.
I agree and that's why I said "at this point". The point I was trying to make is that you have to give every opportunity to a player like Pathan who is more than likely to be a key player in WC in Aus.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...