What's so objectionable about wife beating?

[Mariyam]

They should've fired his *****. Transfer? It's not even a slap on the wrist.

+1 Not just fired, but debarred from practicing ever again. The worst part is that this 'judgement' wasn't an opinion he was giving a friend over an evening chai party. This is what he said in a court, a high court at that. God help us.

[gaurav92]

+1 Not just fired, but debarred from practicing ever again. The worst part is that this 'judgement' wasn't an opinion he was giving a friend over an evening chai party. This is what he said in a court, a high court at that. God help us.

:dito:

[DomainK]

+1 Not just fired, but debarred from practicing ever again. The worst part is that this 'judgement' wasn't an opinion he was giving a friend over an evening chai party. This is what he said in a court, a high court at that. God help us.

And it was in direct and deliberate violation of the oath he has taken to enforce the law. It's not his place to express his opinion in contradiction to the law. The law says clearly that domestic violence is not allowed and here is a high court judge, forcing a woman, who had come to him for justice, to obediently accept the torture. He is just not qualified for the job.

[bihutoli]

Our judiciary makes these "judgements" from time to time. Like letting a rapist go free because he offered to marry the victim. And this. Its like they're willing to let the perpetrators decide their punishment!

[nballa]

woman was not allowed to enter Bombay HC because she was wearing a sleeveless top :facepalm: [2]. [1] http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=285455 [2] http://www.mid-day.com/columnists/2012/sep/050912-Lets-not-skirt-the-real-issue.htm

maybe because the HC chairs were not made of titanium.

[bajrang]

somebody please push the whale back into the sea before it dehydrates.