No strain, plenty of gain

[rkt.india]

Bruce Reid. The mere mention of his name conjures memories and regrets, of a rare Australian pace-bowling talent apparently cursed by a slender body and a haplessly fragile back. Billy Birmingham may have immortalised him as the fast bowler who "snapped in half", but Reid's Test digits were startling enough - 113 wickets at 24.63, strike rate 55.20 - without a comedian's touch. They gain gravity and tragedy when added to the fact Reid played the last of 27 matches in 1992. He was 29. Consider for a moment the words of Bob Simpson, the national coach for most of Reid's career: "My biggest 'if only' is Bruce Reid. If he had stayed fit there is no doubt at all that Australia would have been recognised as world champions two or three years before we were able to claim that position, simply because he was a great bowler, one of the finest bowlers I have ever seen." Like most at the time, Simpson considered Reid's demise to be unavoidable, reasoning that he and his doctors did all they could to reinforce his body and his back. It was a popular view that Reid was simply too fragile for his craft. There was more to it than that, of course, as Reid himself has alluded at times. His early career has become, alongside those of Dennis Lillee, Craig McDermott and Jason Gillespie, a major influence on the path trodden by Australia's coaching and medical staff to develop the likes of James Pattinson, Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins. Avoiding a repeat of the Reid case study is at the forefront of their minds. Perhaps the greatest misconception about Reid is that he was injury-prone from the start. When asked about him recently, one former Australia fast bowler and sometime Test team-mate of Reid's exclaimed, "he never played two Tests in a row" as though it were incontrovertible fact. The truth is quite different. Before he started to become a frequent visitor to hospitals and orthopaedic surgeons in late 1987, Reid played his first seven Tests in succession and 15 of a possible 16 before he broke down against New Zealand with the first of innumerable back complaints. During that time, Reid also played 41 ODIs. When he left the field on the first day of that Adelaide Test match, Reid was 24 years old. From there he would play only another 12 Test matches and 20 ODIs over five years, in between recurring and debilitating problems that forced the removal of two discs from his back and the insertion of a metal plate. Those few matches included Reid's greatest days as a Test bowler, 13 Ashes wickets against England at the MCG in 1990 and 12 against India on the same ground a year later. But his appearances became increasingly sporadic, as other parts of his body broke down due to the changes made to his action to lessen the pressure on his rebuilt back. The damage, regrettably, had been done. The early demands on Reid were heavy for any bowler, let alone a young paceman with a slender and still growing body. Partly due to his early aptitude for Test-match bowling, partly due to the paucity of options left to the national selectors due to the rebel South Africa tours, Reid was cast as a stock bowler well before his frame was entirely ready for the task. It is highly likely those early exertions, un-tempered by a wider plan, had an enormous influence on the injuries that would blight him later on. Reid has noted ruefully that he played in an era when there was not much science or precision to training methods either. Most Test balls delivered by Australian fast bowlers under the age of 23 since 1970 Craig McDermott 3035 (505.5 overs) Dennis Lillee 1471 (equivalent to 245.2 six-ball overs) Bruce Reid 1407 (234.3 overs) Mitchell Starc 1379 (229.5 overs) Jason Gillespie 1370 (228.2 overs) James Pattinson 1254 (209 overs) "We were in that era where it was semi-professional, we weren't earning the big bucks they're earning now, some of us were still working, then trying to go to cricket and play and try to fit in as much as you could," he said in a 2010 interview. "In the old days, if the boys ran 15 laps around the oval then everyone did it, and you were expected to run time trials at the same pace as the batters and all that sort of stuff. It's a lot different now, where things are done to suit every body shape, and there's no doubt that would've benefited not only me but probably a lot of guys in that era." A comprehensive review of the formative years of fast bowlers is one of the less-trumpeted but more valuable pieces of work conducted by Cricket Australia's team performance regime. In their research, which covers the past 40 years, the bowling undertaken by pacemen up to the ages of 23-25 is placed in the sharpest focus. The data suggests, overwhelmingly, that bowlers are likely to face a range of injury problems until their body matures fully, around the time they turn 25. However it is quite possible that by overloading a young bowler, their body can be scarred to a point that even after 25 is reached, injuries will worsen. Alex Kountouris, who has been working as a physio with the national team since 2003, told ESPNcricinfo how Reid and others provided priceless knowledge about what can befall a young bowler if pushed too hard, too soon. In the cases of Starc and Pattinson, careful management is particularly necessary, for they have already reached a volume of Test-match bowling at a young age that only four other Australia bowlers had reached since 1970. "Mitch Starc and James Pattinson are both around 23 and they're in a group that have bowled the most deliveries in Test matches at that age in the past 40 years," Kountouris says. "Those others are Craig McDermott, who is way above anyone else after debuting at 19, Dennis Lillee, Jason Gillespie, and Bruce Reid. The interesting thing about that is, Gillespie, Lillee and Reid all had injury problems in the years subsequent to that, and Craig was done by 31. "We've got history behind us saying this is what happens when these guys get to this age, so be careful. So we're trying to look after them. As far as how we do that, no one's got a magic bullet for it, it's something we're learning about. But our goal is not to go down the same path as what happened in the past. Craig retired at 31 - we'd like to think our guys are going to go for a bit longer than that, and that's what the expectation is these days." This is the statistical and historical background to why Starc and Pattinson have their bowling workloads and progression from format to format monitored closely by Kountouris, the team performance manager, Pat Howard, and the pace bowling coach, Ali de Winter. It is also why Howard and the Sydney Sixers fell out last year over Pat Cummins' bowling at the Champions League T20 in South Africa, when the 19-year-old complained of back soreness during the event but played on until its conclusion, whereupon a stress fracture was revealed. Kountouris and Howard know that from the age of 25 a fast bowler is likely to enter a period of maturity and durability that will ensure a long and fruitful stint as an international bowler - provided they are not damaged irreparably before they get there. "We've got data showing us that fast bowlers are very resilient between the ages of 25 and 30 - that's when they're at their best," Kountouris says. "Before the age of 25 they're prone to having certain injuries, after 30 they're prone to certain injuries, and we see that players fade away. But that period, the sweet spot, is where players are at their best. There's a couple things that happen: one, their bodies have matured; two, they have a history of bowling, they've built up their workloads and they've got a good base because they've done it from the age of 20-25. "But also they're more experienced and they know their bodies well. So any athlete in that age group knows their body well and knows when to go hard and when to back off. That's no different to Peter Siddle, Ben Hilfenhaus, Mitchell Johnson, who are all around that age group and all very reliable. It's not necessarily individualised to a particular player, it's just that Jason Gillespie at 28 is better than Pat Cummins at 19. Will Pat be as good as Jason Gillespie at 28? We'd like to think so." Dennis Lillee has a word with James Pattinson, Perth, January 30, 2013 Lessons learned from Dennis Lillee's playing career may help James Pattinson prolong his ŽÂ© Getty Images Enlarge Johnson's slingy, streaky action will always ensure he holds an enigmatic place in Australian cricket. But in terms of longevity, he fits the profile of a young bowler battling injuries before developing into a reliable campaigner, at least physically speaking, in adulthood. From an early point when he was considered too injury-prone to hold a state contract, Johnson matured into a constant presence in Australia's team from 2007 to 2011. "He played 46 Tests straight, he played 110 ODIs, and that's as good as anyone in the history of the game for durability," Kountouris says. "We know when they get to a certain age, they've built this tolerance, and we don't know exactly what it is, but for whatever reason they become resilient at that age. It's our job to get the young guys to that stage as injury-free or as smoothly as possible. "It's like having a 15-year-old, and saying 'I know he's going to grow but I want him to be six foot four, can he hurry up and be that height?' He will get there eventually because he's tracking to be that height, but it's not going to happen before time. And that's what we're finding at the moment." Such thinking arrived too late for Reid's generation, leaving his story as a cautionary tale for the current coterie of sports scientists, coaches and medical staff to learn from. But there is one area that Reid did not have to contend with - the leap from Twenty20 to Test matches and back again, which Kountouris admitted was the greatest challenge facing those seeking to adequately prepare cricketers in general and fast bowlers in particular. "We've now got a Champions League before the start of our domestic season, and a Big Bash in the middle of our domestic season, and those tournaments alone don't do anything but it just creates a re-shuffling of games," Kountouris says. "Bowlers' workloads go from really low to really high, so it is a significant challenge. And it is new, it is something that's only been around in this volume for the last couple of years. And we're learning from our experiences, we're getting better and we have to get better managing it, because it's part of life. "I recently bumped into a former AFL footballer and coach, now commentator, and he said 'what's amazing about your sport is it's like playing three different sports at the same time, it's unbelievable'. He's from outside the game and he saw it as T20, one-dayers and Tests are all virtually different sports, and we're trying to juggle them at the same time. Some guys are trying to play all of them, some are trying to play one, some two, and it is something unique to cricket." Among the problems presented by the T20 age is the lack of history from which to form a method for better practice. In that way, Starc, Pattinson and Cummins are unwitting case studies for future generations, just as Reid once was. It is to be hoped none of them are snapped in half by the schedule.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia/content/current/story/603419.html Varun Aaron is heading the same path with back injuries and he has not even played a lot of matches in last 2 years. His last FC match for Jharkhand was in 2010.

[Crookbond]

RKT - A lot of experts including Geoff Lawson, Holding and Lillee believe that bowlers "bowl" too little and end of doing others things more which impedes their fitness levels for well bowling. What do you make of that?

[saneindian]

The bowling coach we never had. He was brilliant when he was our bowling consultant on the 2003-04 tour, expressed his desire to get involved in the Indian set up but the BCCI never reciprocated :(( Who knows during that 2005-06 period when we had so many young bowlers coming through he could have helped the RPs, Munafs and Sreesanths.

[rkt.india]

RKT - A lot of experts including Geoff Lawson' date=' Holding and Lillee believe that bowlers "bowl" too little and end of doing others things more which impedes their fitness levels for well bowling. What do you make of that?[/quote'] I think there is no perfect recipe or guide about how a bowler should be doing about his bowling. There are different bodies and different way of taking the load. But one thing is for sure when bowlers suddenly up their work load, they tend to have more possibilities of injuries. It is not like Lillie, Holding never suffered injuries but still I agree until you will make body used to taking such high stress on it, it will not be able to take it for long and will break down. The best of example of it are the labors and farmers who do work in their yard, farms or work sites. They can do such hard work day and in and day out because their bodies have become used to it. People like you and me wont sustain an hour of such work.

[Old guy]

i just wanna know in past did bowlers played with injuries a lot more? now a days slight niggle and they are of the field..im not saying they should not but i think in past bowlers just ignored these little things and kept on bowling... maybe now a days with better technology we are just picking up lot more symptoms of injuries? :P

[rkt.india]

one of the things i have seen is pace can be maintained even at an old age lee clocked 150 in bbl nannes too is similar pace they are both over 35' date=' irfan is over 30,so it not all over if you are injured in your 20s[/quote'] Kallis clocks 140 even at 37.

[express bowling]

Nowadays, pacers are losing less pace, between 30 to 36 yrs, than they used to even 10 yrs back. But they are getting injured more frequently than their predecessors, between the age of 20 to 30 yrs. I wonder whether many of them are because pacers don't give their body enough time to recuperate after heavy workouts at the gym. Recuperation time is very important. Guys like Steyn and Morkel get injured less. I wonder whether it is because they don't overwork themselves at the gym ?

[Crookbond]

I think there is no perfect recipe or guide about how a bowler should be doing about his bowling. There are different bodies and different way of taking the load. But one thing is for sure when bowlers suddenly up their work load' date=' they tend to have more possibilities of injuries. It is not like Lillie, Holding never suffered injuries [b']but still I agree until you will make body used to taking such high stress on it, it will not be able to take it for long and will break down. The best of example of it are the labors and farmers who do work in their yard, farms or work sites. They can do such hard work day and in and day out because their bodies have become used to it. People like you and me wont sustain an hour of such work.

We are not talking about the secret sauce but some basic guidelines. I think bowlers should 'bowl' and not spend time in the 'gym'. The gym should be used as a complement not a replacement for the action on field.

[rkt.india]

We are not talking about the secret sauce but some basic guidelines. I think bowlers should 'bowl' and not spend time in the 'gym'. The gym should be used as a complement not a replacement for the action on field.

Agree. Gym is only to gain strength which only complement bowler's bowling. Bowling in the nets is the most important aspect of bowling. How is one supposed to bowl long spells in the test if one is not used to bowl long spells int the nets.