oneANDone Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 looks like there are only two groups in ipl one for csk and other for anti csk its like :csk: vs :mi::rcb::dd::kkr::dc::pw::kxip::rr: :haha: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted April 11, 2013 Author Share Posted April 11, 2013 I Ij Hate CSK Podus.. :mad: Now we're talking :two_thumbs_up: HATERS UNITE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahaa Raavana Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Did someone hit you in the head? :hysterical: Read the article and you will realize that they are talking all BS. There is nothing of substance in that related to cricket except why we need to get suspicious if someone scores at 200 SR or bowls at 100 mph and ofc nothing remotely related to CSK. Nope...Think about it mate... No franchise in their right minds would have agreed to drop the world's top ranked T20 team's players even without a single word of protest unless they have a definite,underhand edge over the other franchises...That is the only logical explanation...:sherlock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulGame Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 looks like there are only two groups in ipl one for csk and other for anti csk its like :csk: vs :mi::rcb::dd::kkr::dc::pw::kxip::rr: :haha: Success creates jealousy ,Jealousy creates hate. Better hated than sympathized like Puuuunjab or mocked like Bambis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Nope...Think about it mate... No franchise in their right minds would have agreed to drop the world's top ranked T20 team's players even without a single word of protest unless they have a definite,underhand edge over the other franchises...That is the only logical explanation...:sherlock: Ok so went from Steroids to Srini mama. Let's finish the Steroids angle first. Are you saying Lankan players in IPL use steroids? :winky: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulGame Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Nope...Think about it mate... No franchise in their right minds would have agreed to drop the world's top ranked T20 team's players even without a single word of protest unless they have a definite,underhand edge over the other franchises...That is the only logical explanation...:sherlock: Nope.Because that was the only solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahaa Raavana Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Ok so went from Steroids to Srini mama. Let's finish the Steroids angle first. Are you saying Lankan players in IPL use steroids? :winky: Having dinner atm...will be back shortly :vroam: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 I was unsuire but after that Hussey incident,count me in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 I was unsuire but after that Hussey incident' date='count me in[/quote'] Yea right, you need a marginal run out call to make you a convert. :giggle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Yea right' date=' you need a marginal run out call to make you a convert. :giggle:[/quote'] marginal?:hysterical::hysterical: I was unsure earlier,meaning I was considering hating before too:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulGame Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 I was unsuire but after that Hussey incident' date='count me in[/quote'] 10 wkt thrashings does this to people :cantstop: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 marginal?:hysterical::hysterical: I was unsure earlier,meaning I was considering hating before too:D Well bat was on the line, only question being was there any part of the bat beyond the line. Yes that is marginal. In in the replay shot someone posted on this site, you can see a little part of the bat beyond the line. Not a great decision, but one I can live with. :--D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulGame Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 marginal?:hysterical::hysterical: I was unsure earlier,meaning I was considering hating before too:D It wasnt marginal ?:hysterical: It was about a single frame but obviously not marginal :haha: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Well bat was on the line' date=' only question being was there any part of the bat beyond the line. Yes that is marginal. In in the replay shot someone posted on this site, you can see a little part of the bat beyond the line. Not a great decision, but one I can live with. :--D[/quote'] on the line is out.nothing was beyond.clear cut out decision if you are unbiased:--D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulGame Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 on the line is out.nothing was beyond.clear cut out decision if you are unbiased:--D Could u post a snap shot of that incident where both the bats are clearly dislodged and bat was still on the line. I too believe it was out but all this clear cut certain is confusing me.From the replays they showed it was btw the frames (both the bails being dislodged and bat on the line). It was just common sense that it was out not as clear cut as u are making out IMO. 3rd umpire made a poor decision by taking the adv. to batsman bit too far (like Synomds stumping in Sydney) but all these kanspiracy :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Bat beyond the line. Click on the bar to see the original image size. I rest my case. :bow: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidhoni Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Hussey just got the benefit of doubt. They should have ultraslomo for runouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidhoni Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Bat beyond the line. Click on the bar to see the original image size. I rest my case. :bow: Such preciseness :hatsoff: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Could u post a snap shot of that incident where both the bats are clearly dislodged and bat was still on the line. I too believe it was out but all this clear cut certain is confusing me.From the replays they showed it was btw the frames (both the bails being dislodged and bat on the line). It was just common sense that it was out not as clear cut as u are making out IMO. 3rd umpire made a poor decision by taking the adv. to batsman bit too far (like Synomds stumping in Sydney) but all these kanspiracy :hysterical: Symonds stumping was out too:dontknow: bat was on the line,not over when bails were dislodged?what was the doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulGame Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Symonds stumping was out too:dontknow: bat was on the line,not over when bails were dislodged?what was the doubt Image? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts