Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Yes - Mallus have inimitable names. Mariyam can explicate further. :--D ur name is jsut as bad :beee:
SLICKR392 Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 ur name is jsut as bad :beee: Well at least we don't need a whole day to spell out his name unlike someone else here. :giggle:
SLICKR392 Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 that explains it.. but why :(( unless ur allergic to fish its a good thing :P anyway on topic..our bhuvi has taken more wickets than legendary super tailunted junaid khan who took 1 wicket in 3 matches :D Even I tried sticking to the topic with some Bhuvi posts but people are more concerned about Mallus and fishes. :headshake:
CSK Fan Posted June 15, 2013 Author Posted June 15, 2013 I would give out my name but ti will be very easy to find online/facebook then. It's a slight variation on a very common Indian Hindu name so it's not weird. But because I value my privacy, I even do my writing under a pseudonym.
G_B_ Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Lets just move on and value the "h" BK is a fantastic bowler.
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 BK has 4 wickets to Junaid's 1 legendary bowlers pawned again
Crookbond Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Mostly the Christians in Kerala. :winky: Exactly but they are Mallus after all. ur name is jsut as bad :beee: :dontknow:
SLICKR392 Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 BK has 4 wickets to Junaid's 1 Brilliant to lefties. Warner & Cowan in the Aus series and Nasir & Gayle in CT. Gayle was uncomfortable against Bhuvi during the IPL too.
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Brilliant to lefties. Warner & Cowan in the Aus series and Nasir & Gayle in CT. Gayle was uncomfortable against Bhuvi during the IPL too. i hope he keeps improving cos he is not bad to righties too but has perfect angle against lefties with some balls holding line others cutting them in half..
SLICKR392 Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 i hope he keeps improving cos he is not bad to righties too but has perfect angle against lefties with some balls holding line others cutting them in half.. I liked the way he started against Kamran. He was expecting an inswinger and was in doubt for the first few balls or rather waiting for one and BANG! an inswinger which he edges to slip.
CSK Fan Posted June 15, 2013 Author Posted June 15, 2013 Brilliant to lefties. Warner & Cowan in the Aus series and Nasir & Gayle in CT. Gayle was uncomfortable against Bhuvi during the IPL too. Don't forget the bowled/lbw's he had against the righties with the ball coming in. If he gets more support, can be the complete package for India, including death bowling
G_B_ Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 I thought today Bhuvi was a bit low on pace. It did work for him though. He was bowling at the PK pace for part of his spell. Maybe he realized that if he slowed up he got more swing especially with this ball?
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 I liked the way he started against Kamran. He was expecting an inswinger and was in doubt for the first few balls or rather waiting for one and BANG an inswinger which he edges to slip. when it swings this guy is as good as any bowler.. great find this year..i still think shami deserved a proper run and was bowling well and tight with new ball along with bhuvi :((
CSK Fan Posted June 15, 2013 Author Posted June 15, 2013 I thought today Bhuvi was a bit low on pace. It did work for him though. He was bowling at the PK pace for part of his spell. Maybe he realized that if he slowed up he got more swing especially with this ball? All Indian bowlers seemed to be low on pace today. Maybe they were asked not to go all out to avoid injuries in a dead rubber?
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 All Indian bowlers seemed to be low on pace today. Maybe they were asked not to go all out to avoid injuries in a dead rubber? yeah that could be...
G_B_ Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 All Indian bowlers seemed to be low on pace today. Maybe they were asked not to go all out to avoid injuries in a dead rubber? could be. They were getting a lot more swing than their pakistani counterparts. But your right I think management wanted them to avoid injury.
SLICKR392 Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 when it swings this guy is as good as any bowler.. great find this year..i still think shami deserved a proper run and was bowling well and tight with new ball along with bhuvi :(( Of course, he did and as MTC mentioned of needing a support from the other end- Shami was the perfect guy. These guys gave a hell lot of trouble to the English openers; Bell and Cook, who are generally known as solid at the start. I think even Bell acknowledged these 2 by stating that they have to respect and be very watchful against Bhuvi and Shami. I really thought Shami would make it to the CT but they stuck to the Ishants and Vinays. :headshake:
SLICKR392 Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 All Indian bowlers seemed to be low on pace today. Maybe they were asked not to go all out to avoid injuries in a dead rubber? That could be it. Yadav was very slow and so was Bhuvi who bowled at an avg. of 135+ in the previous games.
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Of course, he did and as MTC mentioned of needing a support from the other end- Shami was the perfect guy. These guys gave a hell lot of trouble to the English openers; Bell and Cook, who are generally known as solid at the start. I think even Bell acknowledged these 2 by stating that they have to respect and be very watchful against Bhuvi and Shami. I really thought Shami would make it to the CT but they stuck to the Ishants and Vinays. :headshake: seriously it was perfect opening bowling attack both were super tight and gave away almost nothing shami's length would have suited these pitches much much more..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now