CSK Fan Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 No thread for this guy? We tend to hype everyone else like Yadav, Aaron, etc just because they are a few kph faster. But here we have a genuine, young, immensely talented seam bowler and I feel he doesn't get enough appreciation (even from the captain). His control is excellent. It's scary how soon he picks up new things and is willing to learn. His death bowling has improved by leaps, now if only the captain trusts him a bit more at death So here is to BK, long may he bowl for India and continue taking loads of wickets, both with new and old ball
G_B_ Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 BhuvaneSHwar Kumar whats with south indians and missing the h after the s? Shivaji= Sivaji. For god sake atleast respect proper nouns. and the same goes for the TH as well. Most names ending with t have the added h. Nishant = Nishanth
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 awesome bowling again today.. that ball he bowled to jamshed was a beauty ..perfect ball imo
NareshK Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Very good bowler. Managed to get crucial breakthroughs at the start like getting out Ingram, Gayle, Nazir Jamshed. He will get better as he plays more often. :nice:
CSK Fan Posted June 15, 2013 Author Posted June 15, 2013 BhuvaneSHwar Kumar whats with south indians and missing the h after the s? Shivaji= Sivaji. For god sake atleast respect proper nouns. and the same goes for the TH as well. Most names ending with t have the added h. Nishant = Nishanth Dude, I would be the last one to be accused of that thing since I am most comfortable with hindi than any other language and am very familiar with the nuances. Sometimes a typo is just a typo
saneindian Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 We have had a lot of threads on Bhuvi , all thoroughly derailed by the trolls from acorss the border with their Junaid and Irfan talk. I actually searched for one to bump it today, saw some of those posts and decided not to bump it again only to see it getting derailed again. As for lack of support from the captain, obviously praising him to the hilt in the post match presentation is 'lack of faith'. Not too long ago, the same captain was accused of favouring trundlers like BK as he didn't like keeping to pacers.
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Yadav > Bhuvan right now ? no way not in odis anyway.. tests even i will prefer yadav but that is not the topic so lets not derail :D i think if u look at our wins bhuvan has biggest role always getting main players out.. that ingram was in great form and gayle was looking dangerous jamshed was probably best pak batsman..atleast again us.. really really good performance i just hope he continues like this !
NareshK Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Yadav > Bhuvan Not in ODIs though. Perhaps in tests. Yadav needs lot more control in his bowling to become more effective in ODIs. It would be good to have a bowler who bowls at that pace in ODIs because he gets you wickets but because of his inconsistent line and length, he always goes for runs which is not ideal. Hope he rectifies this soon.
Gunner Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 right now ? no way not in odis anyway.. tests even i will prefer yadav but that is not the topic so lets not derail :D i think if u look at our wins bhuvan has biggest role always getting main players out.. that ingram was in great form and gayle was looking dangerous jamshed was probably best pak batsman..atleast again us.. really really good performance i just hope he continues like this ! I meant in the real format Test cricket. Yadav averages 47 in ODIs.
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Not in ODIs though. Perhaps in tests. Yadav needs lot more control in his bowling to become more effective in ODIs. It would be good to have a bowler who bowls at that pace in ODIs because he gets you wickets but because of his inconsistent line and length, he always goes for runs which is not ideal. Hope he rectifies this soon. +1 we can still afford to have him imo but he needs to improve i want ishant out now and if yadav does not improves he should stick to tests we can try more people like mohit and get some specialist death bowler ..anyone who can jsut bowl yorker length :wall:
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 I meant in the real format Test cricket. Yadav averages 47 in ODIs. yeah but i presumed we are talking about current tournament in tests yadav is much more valuable with his reverse swing and wicket taking ability ..
G_B_ Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Dude' date=' I would be the last one to be accused of that thing since I am most comfortable with hindi than any other language and am very familiar with the nuances. Sometimes a typo is just a typo[/quote'] My apology if its a typo. But its a proper noun in English. He could be called Shshshshswar kumar and it would remain a proper noun. Hindi marathi or chinese just does not come into it. Just saying. I got pissed because i am sick of people called Maharashtra Maharastra.
Lord Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 +1 we can still afford to have him imo but he needs to improve i want ishant out now and if yadav does not improves he should stick to tests we can try more people like mohit and get some specialist death bowler ..anyone who can jsut bowl yorker length :wall: Awana can be that bowler I think.seen him bowl good yorkers in IPL
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Awana can be that bowler I think.seen him bowl good yorkers in IPL anyone will do.. i have seen awana bowl some great deliveries with new ball too.. can mohit bowl yorkers ? :hmmm: cos he can be very handy with new ball at upfront and in middle overs ..
maniac Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 My apology if its a typo. But its a proper noun in English. He could be called Shshshshswar kumar and it would remain a proper noun. Hindi marathi or chinese just does not come into it. Just saying. I got pissed because i am sick of people called Maharashtra Maharastra. Stop stereotyping mate....if any the pure Hindi belt tend to omit H more often South Indians......I mean names like vignesh,suresh,venkatesh,Ramesh are common in south and we tend to pronounce them phonetically more often than the northies
Lord Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 anyone will do.. i have seen awana bowl some great deliveries with new ball too.. can mohit bowl yorkers ? :hmmm: cos he can be very handy with new ball at upfront and in middle overs .. dont think so,not yet.
Old guy Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 dont think so' date='not yet.[/quote'] i can promise u he will do better than ishant at death.. he has enough pace too
maniac Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Awana can be that bowler I think.seen him bowl good yorkers in IPL Awana needs to be as good as say steyn to get into the side thanks to fielding abilities
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now