great siri Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 wat there to laugh guys???we were playing our 2nd string side and we got unlucky due to rain rule .very difficult to contain with a wet ball.it was a great batting track.we were heading for a huge total but i cant understand this enjoyment as if ind would hav defended 198 in 23 overs
carnish Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 wat there to laugh guys???we were playing our 2nd string side and we got unlucky due to rain rule .very difficult to contain with a wet ball.it was a great batting track.we were heading for a huge total but i cant understand this enjoyment as if ind would hav defended 198 in 23 overs Sanga, Dilshan, Malinga, Kula ... Matthews, Chandimal and you say you had a 2nd string team?? Is this a joke ... If any team had a 2nd string side it was New Zealand ... No Brendon, Taylor, Williamson, Vettori or Guptill. You got your ass kicked as always ... Accept that your team has gone to the dogs and move on.
saurabhg1 Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 wat there to laugh guys???we were playing our 2nd string side and we got unlucky due to rain rule .very difficult to contain with a wet ball.it was a great batting track.we were heading for a huge total but i cant understand this enjoyment as if ind would hav defended 198 in 23 overs India successfully defended 178 in 26 overs against your chumps... :giggle::giggle: http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/597928.html and by the way, weren't you crying about the D/L target then, thought this was a far stiffer challenge that NZ got (20 more runs, 3 lesser overs) :finger::finger:
Magneto Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 India successfully defended 178 in 26 overs against your chumps... :giggle::giggle: http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/597928.html and by the way, weren't you crying about the D/L target then, thought this was a far stiffer challenge that NZ got (20 more runs, 3 lesser overs) :finger::finger: Saurabhg1 is someone's alter ego here. :sherlock: Whose? :hmmm:
jalebi_bhai Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 anyone scored more than 6 runs in the last ball to win the game?? say - 7 needed from 1 ball and the chasing team wins Happened in NZ domestic match......I think it was Andre Adams.......
Magneto Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 anyone scored more than 6 runs in the last ball to win the game?? say - 7 needed from 1 ball and the chasing team wins Jonty Rhodes once scored 10 runs in one ball against Richard Snell at a SA domestic game.
Asim Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 I have a query... what was the least amount of runs required in last over that batting side could not achieve despite playing all 6 deliveries? (not even a tie)
jatindra Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 @asim : 2 runs was needed from last over by Australia against New Zeland. Batsman was Bruis Reid (AUS) who has not scored any run in that over and Australia lost the match by 1 run. I think the bowler was C Pringle http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65474.html Just 2 runs were required off the final over, but Pringle bowled a maiden to Reid.
Asim Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 ^ WOW & that's of-course the minimum possible with that criteria... Thx sharing...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now