G_B_ Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 its hardly warns BCCI it was more of a suggestion on how they need to go about weilding their power. Fair to say Pawar and Manohar did not use their power in the way the Srinivasan has gone about it. Shashank Monahar was probably the template of what a BCCI prez should be
GoldenSun Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 its hardly warns BCCI it was more of a suggestion on how they need to go about weilding their power. Fair to say Pawar and Manohar did not use their power in the way the Srinivasan has gone about it. Shashank Monahar was probably the template of what a BCCI prez should be I thought I was the only one who believed that.
Crookbond Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 Yeah that is definitely true. I don't think he has it in him to be a good speaker. I would have preferred Dravid. He is really fluent in English. I was being sarcastic!
GoldenSun Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 I was being sarcastic! Im sluggish in the wee hours of the morning :(( *sweatdrops*.
Cricketics Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 DM's sarcasm :fail: Lol DM bhai disclaimer likh kar sarcasm show karna padega abse.
GoldenSun Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 But speaking from a more serious tone, I would have loved it if Dravid had come out with this statement. He would have hit it home.
Debutant Posted November 14, 2013 Posted November 14, 2013 Some really great points there. One thing I could not understand. Kumble said that when he was new to International cricket, Pataudi said Kumble can not spin the ball hence would not be a wicket taking bowler but a containing bowler. After 600 wickets, he could never confront him. He went on for some time about it too. What exactly he wanted to convey here ??? :idunno:
Crookbond Posted November 14, 2013 Posted November 14, 2013 Some really great points there. One thing I could not understand. Kumble said that when he was new to International cricket' date=' Pataudi said Kumble can not spin the ball hence would not be a wicket taking bowler but a containing bowler. After 600 wickets, he could never confront him. He went on for some time about it too. What exactly he wanted to convey here ??? :idunno:[/quote'] He has touched it later in his speech. Basically, he says that an appreciable percentage of cricket is played in the mind i.e. even if someone writes you off as 1D, you can carve your own nice (IMO, works in your professional life too)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now