Old guy Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 I do not see them leaving much grass. It will help Harris and Siddle as much if it is green and will make them more potent that they have been this series. Mitch can come into play on any pitch once Harris and Siddle support him better than they did last match. Regarding swing' date=' it needs to happen in the air for him as his seam position is not that great for it to seam. He has done it though time to time. A little bit of swing is enough at that pace.[/quote'] problem is on harder track morkel will bowl fast short ones too so to me bowling will be even if johnon fires and harris is not gonna bowl like before as he is just not fit enough right now and siddle is type of bowler who never takes wickets in heaps he is more of a work horse who is clearly not at his best even pace wise while on the other hand steyn is getting better with every inning and phialnder looked good even on dry track so if its bowling vs bowling i think south africa are in better form even is johnson on his own is more destructive
rkt.india Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 problem is on harder track morkel will bowl fast short ones too so to me bowling will be even if johnon fires and harris is not gonna bowl like before as he is just not fit enough right now and siddle is type of bowler who never takes wickets in heaps he is more of a work horse who is clearly not at his best even pace wise while on the other hand steyn is getting better with every inning and phialnder looked good even on dry track so if its bowling vs bowling i think south africa are in better form even is johnson on his own is more destructive Before this series, I did not give Aus any chance of wining because bowling wise they can be comparable but SA has a far superior batting line with Smith, ABDV, Amla, and Faf. You cannot name anyone except Clarke whom you could put your money on before the series started. Johnson on his own made a real difference in first test but did not get enough support in 2nd. For them, Lyon also has done well and made for Harris and Siddle to some extent. Pattinson might come for Harris.
Old guy Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 Before this series' date=' I did not give Aus any chance of wining because bowling wise they can be comparable but SA has a far superior batting line with Smith, ABDV, Amla, and Faf. You cannot name anyone except Clarke whom you could put your money on before the series started. Johnson on his own made a real difference in first test but did not get enough support in 2nd. For them, Lyon also has done well and made for Harris and Siddle to some extent. Pattinson might come for Harris.[/quote'] i do not rate pattinson that high tbh..but any one is better than half dead ryano :(
rkt.india Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 i do not rate pattinson that high tbh..but any one is better than half dead ryano :( Pattinson bowls good test match length, not an ODI bowler but will be their spearhead in tests in coming years. The way he had bowled against NZ and then against us in 2012 was as good as it can get for a debutant.
Old guy Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 Pattinson bowls good test match length' date=' not an ODI bowler but will be their spearhead in tests in coming years. The way he had bowled against NZ and then against us in 2012 was as good as it can get for a debutant.[/quote'] its not that ..he just does not looks that threatening against good batman ,probably has to learn to gt better inswing before he gets dangerous against sides like south africa looked completely blunt against england IMO
rkt.india Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 its not that ..he just does not looks that threatening against good batman ,probably has to learn to gt better inswing before he gets dangerous against sides like south africa looked completely blunt against england IMO He was coming back from injury back then and looked rusty and was low in pace too.
Old guy Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 He was coming back from injury back then and looked rusty and was low in pace too. lets see tbh its just not that test i just rate guy like harris (when fit ) lot higher than him he just look better for some reason than pattinson even holding was saying this once that brett lee was exceptional talent but pattinson looks good but nothing of that kind.. i think austraia will just include watson and hope whole bowling line up bowls better with more intensity cos of his inclusion..pattinson will probably get his chances at home first
rkt.india Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 lets see tbh its just not that test i just rate guy like harris (when fit ) lot higher than him he just look better for some reason than pattinson Harris is an experienced bowler and is certainly a better one for now if he is fully fit. even holding was saying this once that brett lee was exceptional talent but pattinson looks good but nothing of that kind.. Yes, I saw that ODI match. I already said he is not a good ODI bowler at this point. Regarding comparison of Lee and Pattinson, both had comparable start in test cricket. Lee blown us in 1999. Pattinson did the same against NZ and our batting line up. Both similar even in terms of pace at their debuts, but Pattinson was 2 years younger. LOIs are a completely different ball game altogether now than what it was in 90s and early 2000s. Even the best of 90s would have found it difficult now.
Old guy Posted February 26, 2014 Posted February 26, 2014 Harris is an experienced bowler and is certainly a better one for now if he is fully fit. Yes, I saw that ODI match. I already said he is not a good ODI bowler at this point. Regarding comparison of Lee and Pattinson, both had comparable start in test cricket. Lee blown us in 1999. Pattinson did the same against NZ and our batting line up. Both similar even in terms of pace at their debuts, but Pattinson was 2 years younger. LOIs are a completely different ball game altogether now than what it was in 90s and early 2000s. Even the best of 90s would have found it difficult now. tbh i have only watched him bowl 5 overs in odi cricket :cantstop: i rate him purely from tests and i think he is good but not as good as he is made out to be ..will make our team easily and will lead the attack but he is not as good that you will expect him to come in and perform here.. one for future :two_thumbs_up:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now