NareshK Posted June 1, 2014 Posted June 1, 2014 Yep' date=' because any kids drawing line on a video > H/E technology which costs millions. So next time, the third umpire should just draw lines to find the trajectory of the ball instead of investing millions on H/E[/quote'] Even if it was a wrong decision(which I don't think it was), DRS is not fool proof. There have been hundreds of DRS decisions which haven't been accurate over the years. Even during Ashes, many DRS decisions became controversial. Its funny to see Ajmal and other Pak fans still whining about it though. :cantstop:
CSK Fan Posted June 1, 2014 Posted June 1, 2014 Even if it was a wrong decision(which I don't think it was), DRS is not fool proof. There have been hundreds of DRS decisions which haven't been accurate over the years. Even during Ashes, many DRS decisions became controversial. Its funny to see Ajmal and other Pak fans still whining about it though. :cantstop: Those controversy during the Ashes had nothing to do with the accuracy but to do with how to interpret the results, the benefit of doubt and the +- cms rule. There is no way the DRS can be that wrong Secondly, I don't know what magic can be used to change the trajectory of a ball real time, in a split second after someone refers and then make it seem missing the stumps. As far as I recall, the time taken for Sachin's H/E to show up was normal
Zap_Brannigan Posted June 1, 2014 Posted June 1, 2014 Those controversy during the Ashes had nothing to do with the accuracy but to do with how to interpret the results, the benefit of doubt and the +- cms rule. There is no way the DRS can be that wrong Secondly, I don't know what magic can be used to change the trajectory of a ball real time, in a split second after someone refers and then make it seem missing the stumps. As far as I recall, the time taken for Sachin's H/E to show up was normal Photoshop dude...Someone photoshoped the stumps 10 inches to the left
keith Posted June 2, 2014 Posted June 2, 2014 It's sad that out of the whole interview - which contained some serious moments of good sportsmanship and humility from Ajmal - Cricinfo chose to pick the one controversial thing he said as the title. I guess that's journalism. Gotta make something out of nothing.
vamos_rafa Posted June 2, 2014 Posted June 2, 2014 Instead of talking rubbish like that chucker' date=' why dont you post that video here which "proves" that it was going to hit the stumps..[/quote'] Excuse me? Where did I say that it was a proof. I just said there are a few videos out there which try and suggest so. Oh, wait, I forgot to add the keywords like dumb etc to make you believe that I am against him? And here's the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2wdg8L2KCg
Zap_Brannigan Posted June 2, 2014 Posted June 2, 2014 Excuse me? Where did I say that it was a proof. I just said there are a few videos out there which try and suggest so. Oh, wait, I forgot to add the keywords like dumb etc to make you believe that I am against him? And here's the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2wdg8L2KCg Allright..i am sorry.. In that video, it was nice of that guy zoom in a frame before it hit the pads..Ironically see this video (its the highest resolution i could find in youtube) dlvG-wGIMjo You can play this in slowmotion..around 0.46 you can see the middle stump slightly before the ball hits the pad..now the ball pitched a few inches outside off, hits him just beyond the middle stump, where was it expected to go?
vamos_rafa Posted June 3, 2014 Posted June 3, 2014 Allright..i am sorry.. In that video, it was nice of that guy zoom in a frame before it hit the pads..Ironically see this video (its the highest resolution i could find in youtube) dlvG-wGIMjo You can play this in slowmotion..around 0.46 you can see the middle stump slightly before the ball hits the pad..now the ball pitched a few inches outside off, hits him just beyond the middle stump, where was it expected to go? It's just plain vanilla editing. These players at such high levels, don't they know. that saying that the Producer did it, w/o an iota of evidence, is a serious allegation?
rkt.india Posted June 3, 2014 Posted June 3, 2014 So let me get this straight. When Ajmal looks like a chucker to the naked eye, it is ok, he has been cleared by technology, naked eye cannot make judgement, he has been cleared by ICC But when Sachin gets saved by technology, all of a sudden naked eye is the right thing,players judgement is better, technology can be manipulated, ICC is wrong, etc, etc, Lol. :hysterical::hysterical:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now