Gambit Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/239917.html From 204/3 in 35 overs, India ended up with 245/9. We didn't even have the excuse of being bowled out! Veeru's knock was eerily similar to Sachin's. Link to comment
Predator_05 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 No way man, this time India finished with 321 from a similar position. Credit to the pakistani bowlers for all those extras and Harbhajan Singh's little cameo Link to comment
varun Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Oh Shush Gambo... Stop riling ppl up :P 321 is a kickass score in Mohali. Link to comment
bigdhoni7 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 isnt 321 the biggest score in Mohali? Link to comment
Predator_05 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Even though Murali is a better bowler than Harbhajan, he couldn't have played a valuable cameo like this 38 off 20. I am pleased with the score - 321 is defendable. The outfield looks is getting slower so hitting boundaries won't be so easy for their batsmen Link to comment
MundaPakistani Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 could have been 370-380 but 321 is still about 70 runs too many for PAK. Link to comment
Shehezaada Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Even though Murali is a better bowler than Harbhajan, he couldn't have played a valuable cameo like this 38 off 20. I am pleased with the score - 321 is defendable. The outfield looks is getting slower so hitting boundaries won't be so easy for their batsmen also under the lights it will be difficult...so looks good for india...the only thing that's bothering me is that the dew will cause bhajji problems Link to comment
Predator_05 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Well, this was a different type of ****-up, eh. India are the sh*ttiest fielding side in the world - i am absolutely convinced now. Can't blame the bowlers too much, but the # of easy singles, doubles and even that triple at the end (Rohit screwing up on the boundary) that they allowed was simply astounding. It is always difficult to bowl under lights at Mohali during this time of the year, but India had plenty of runs to defend and should have won this match. The middle order collapse and the fielding proved to be the difference in the end ...and Younis Khan. How the hell will India ever get him out ? Once he gets set, he is just impossible to dismiss. Link to comment
Holysmoke Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 ...and Younis Khan. How the hell will India ever get him out ? Once he gets set, he is just impossible to dismiss. Get technology to help rule LBW decisions. Both Yousuf and Younus were out to Pathan. One of them was even out twice. Link to comment
Predator_05 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Yeah, Yoosef was out twice. Still, we can't blame the umps alone - the team's crappy fielding performance was the prime reason for India's defeat Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Parth Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 After being 180-2 after 25 then we should have got 350+ poor batting from Yuvraj, Dhoni, Sehwag, Uthappa Link to comment
Holysmoke Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 holy baba can you please update the Umpiring goofups thread with the over number when that happened ...I dont remember the over numbers:eyedance: It was pathan bowling, and when yousuf and younis were batting together, so that leaves 5 overs max.. lemme see if i can find it Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Uthappa was totally not out. Pitched outside the line and was turning to go past the offstump. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now