koksmayu Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 He should be no where near Indian team even good performance in Bangladesh He is there because roger binny
cricketfan28 Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 if he performs well ?? lets wait and then judge him
gaurav92 Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Bookmarked this thread for uber pwnage later on :coolsun:
koksmayu Posted June 29, 2014 Author Posted June 29, 2014 He played enough cricket to judge any fans can judge he is lucky only to be there
gaurav92 Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 He played enough cricket to judge any fans can judge he is lucky only to be there Best individual bowling performance by an Indian bowler #haterzgonnahate
renjith Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 commonsense is enough to understand his selection over rishi dhavan was a corrupted decision. selection is not purely based on statistics and a lot of other factors are also considered. but here the only factor i can see in favour of stuart is he is roger binnys son. rishi dhavan age - 24 fc bowling avg - 23.84 fc batting avg - 40.50 last ranji season form - 435 runs at 39.54 and 49 wickets (highest wicket taker) at 20.30 stuart binny age - 30 fc bowling avg - 31.91 fc batting avg - 36.55 last ranji season form - 321 runs at 40.12 and 11 wickets at 37.18
Lannister Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Atleast he has won a match for India. When is the last time any Indian bowler had a match winning performance other than binny? I'd say he's better than most of our current cr#p bowlers. Even some third rate team are thumping them at the moment.
Insidious Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 If India really needed a batting allrounder then why binny why not Abhisekh nayar? Binny in FC- batting avg- 36.55, bowling avg-31.91 on seaming tracks of chinnaswamy and Hubli while Nayar in FC- batting avg- 51.20, bowling avg - 31.76 on batting paradise of wankhade, which rarely help seamers. Both are of similar age. If they want youngster then Rishi Dhawan is the best available option
Cricket Tragic Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Binny, R Dhawan and Nayar are all CRAP. Saying that A is better than B amongst these jokers is not saying much at all. None of these guys should be anywhere near the team (esp Tests).
ThePhenomenal1 Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 he flopped like majority of bowlers but could be a handy backup if needed
King Tendulkar Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Binny' date=' R Dhawan and Nayar are all CRAP. Saying that A is better than B amongst these jokers is not saying much at all. None of these guys should be anywhere near the team (esp Tests).[/quote'] true But binny is still miles worse then other 2
Midfielder Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Binny played next to Bhatia and no one can tell me he is better than Bhatia. It is a shame.
Yoda-esque Posted June 29, 2014 Posted June 29, 2014 Bookmarked this thread for uber pwnage later on :coolsun: FCB :nice:
fineleg Posted June 30, 2014 Posted June 30, 2014 Binny played next to Bhatia and no one can tell me he is better than Bhatia. It is a shame. This!
undisputed chap Posted June 30, 2014 Posted June 30, 2014 Rank the all rounders considering those already mentioned above plus laxmi shukla & Iran pathan (pace all rounders in india )
singhprakash72 Posted July 1, 2014 Posted July 1, 2014 If Dhamika Prasad could get 5 wkts against Eng why not Binny...he just needs right conditions and situation (don't expect him to open bowling).
cricketfan28 Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 binny is better than rishi dhawan ... rishi dhawan should not be seelcted and should retire asa ranji player ...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now