Bumper Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 Pakistan's premier fast bowler has a serious problem. He is unable to break into an allrounders list at the moment. With his batting & bowling averages reversed he would top the list of all time great all rounders. But currently he will have to settle for the "bowling great" title. Here are a list of former greats who are better than Malcolm Sami at this point. Quite an august company, I must say. No shame finishing next to these great cricketers. Sami: 31 tests, 77 wickets @ 49.63 Carl Hooper: 114 wickets @ 49.42 Mark Waugh: 59 @ 41.16 Steve Waugh: 92 @ 37.74 Jayasuriya: 97 @ 34.31 Dravid: 1 @ 39.00 Give Sami a couple of more series & watch him get past these men. Ganguly: 31 @ 50.12 Tendulkar: 42 @ 51.02 So dont be unfair on Sami next time.
zubinpepsi Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 whatttttt.. Sami has an avg of 49???????? astonishing............ never knew tht... and y the fuk paakis go ga ga about this guy?? mainly cuz of phastttttttttttt?? :hysterical::hysterical:
Bumper Posted November 26, 2007 Author Posted November 26, 2007 You forgot our very own Agarkar. He would fall into the allrounders category
Guest BossBhai Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
Bumper Posted November 26, 2007 Author Posted November 26, 2007 Agarkar 58 @ 47.43, is closing in on Sami. If he gets picked for the Aus tour, there is a good chance he may surpass Sami.
Guest BossBhai Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
Bumper Posted November 26, 2007 Author Posted November 26, 2007 Bumps do u think there is a case for a Aggy >>> Malcolm Sami thread ? .... it has all the makings of a block buster. :haha::haha:, yeah why not!
Bumper Posted November 26, 2007 Author Posted November 26, 2007 The problem for Sami is the hype that was created around him. How much emphasis was placed on his 150 kph thunderbolts ? I have routinely seen pak fans make fun of an Indian attack opening with Ganguly & Kumble. Guess what, Ganguly is no worse a bowler than Sami. India's worst bowler ever Agarkar, has won test matches in Australia. Puts Sami's talent in perspective!
Guest BossBhai Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
Bumper Posted November 26, 2007 Author Posted November 26, 2007 I think it will be a difficult task. I'll try! 1) Test centuries: Agarkar has 2 tons: http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64000.html http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64062.html in addition, a batting ton: http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63997.html Sami has three tons: http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63923.html http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64067.html http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64114.html 2) Aggy averages only 47.43, Sami 49.63 3) Aggy has one six fer, Sami has none
Guest BossBhai Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
Gambit Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 I still remember how some idiotic Pak fans used to wet their pants in excitement and anticipation of the seemingly inevitable destruction of the Indian batting lineup at the hands of Actor and Malcolm Sami, on the 2004 Pak tour. Then 3-2 and 309,194* and 270 and two massive innings defeats happened. :hysterical: :hysterical:
Guest BossBhai Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
MundaPakistani Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 whatttttt.. Sami has an avg of 49???????? astonishing............ never knew tht... and y the fuk paakis go ga ga about this guy?? mainly cuz of phastttttttttttt?? :hysterical::hysterical: that's the main problem. He doesn't bowl phast any more.
zubinpepsi Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 that's the main problem. He doesn't bowl phast any more. MP, What was his average like when bowled real phasttttttttttuu according to pak standards ?
MundaPakistani Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 MP, What was his average like when bowled real phasttttttttttuu according to pak standards ? 46 or 47:D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now