seedhi Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Just to be clear, AAP has NOT rejected support from Nitish, Lalu, TMC, CPI, CPI(ML) etc. Where is the clean politics?
Texan Posted February 6, 2015 Author Posted February 6, 2015 You can ask him 100 times, but if it is a question about any serious matter, you will never get any answer. All you will get is rhetoric.
Sachin=GOD Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 AAP rejects Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid Syed Bukhari's support ahead of Delhi polls http://zeenews.india.com/news/delhi/aap-rejects-shahi-imam-of-jama-masjid-syed-bukharis-support-ahead-of-delhi-polls_1542419.html Mad respect :hatsoff: Who in Indian politics had guts to make such bold statement? Don't just look at the rejection. Look at the words used in rejecting this support. This is an opportunity to usher in a new era in Indian politics. To get over all these rioters, corrupt, caste-ist Netas. Hope people grab it. On the other hand, S=G was so quick to post news of the support from Bukhari but now he'll not post news of rejection. May be, he is searching for another two-wheeler news, so that he can start another thread on that. The only reason they have rejected his support is because he is a panauti - jisko support karta hai woh haar jata hai :hehe:
Sachin=GOD Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Just to be clear' date=' AAP has NOT rejected support from Nitish, Lalu, TMC, CPI, CPI(ML) etc. Where is the clean politics?[/quote'] You forgot the All India Imam Association. Obviously all these parties/organizations are the very example of clean politics in this country hence they support AAP and AAP has taken their support.
Raghav_12 Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 The only reason they have rejected his support is because he is a panauti - jisko support karta hai woh haar jata hai :hehe: then you would have known that BJP had paid Bukhari to declare support for AAP, so that they lose. Still you went ahead and posted this news removing any reference of BJP.
Sachin=GOD Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 then you would have known that BJP had paid Bukhari to declare support for AAP' date=' so that they lose. Still you went ahead and posted this news removing any reference of BJP.[/quote'] Source? The only news I saw was of Bukhari announcing his support for AAP and asking his followers to vote for them. There was absolutely no mention of BJP anywhere.
seedhi Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 then you would have known that BJP had paid Bukhari to declare support for AAP' date=' so that they lose. Still you went ahead and posted this news removing any reference of BJP.[/quote']Any proof of this allegation?
ravishingravi Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Aam aadmi ka genius. Read between the lines.
randomGuy Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Looks like rG & Raghav are busy distributing liquor. For bjp?
Raghav_12 Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Source? The only news I saw was of Bukhari announcing his support for AAP and asking his followers to vote for them. There was absolutely no mention of BJP anywhere. Same which told you that AAP rejected his support because he is a panauti :giggle:
Sachin=GOD Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Same which told you that AAP rejected his support because he is a panauti :giggle: That was sarcasm...you may not have recognized it :giggle: BTW any answer to Seedhi's question? Or on support of Left/TMC/Nitsh/Lalu etc?
Raghav_12 Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 That was sarcasm...you may not have recognized it :giggle: BTW any answer to Seedhi's question? Or on support of Left/TMC/Nitsh/Lalu etc? Mine was sarcasm as well, just you couldn't recognize it. :giggle:
randomGuy Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Banyal joined BJP? Who the hell is banyal:cantstop:
Sachin=GOD Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Mine was sarcasm as well' date=' just you couldn't recognize it. :giggle:[/quote'] You throw around so many wild allegations that its difficult to distinguish reality from sarcasm :giggle:
seedhi Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Same which told you that AAP rejected his support because he is a panauti :giggle:You said he removed reference to BJP. What reference are you talking about? Is there there some news report about this allegation you made?
Sachin=GOD Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 TIMES NOW @TimesNow 5m5 minutes ago AAP claims that it hasn't sought support, but Shahi Imam Bukhari's aide claims that AAP sought support from the Imam. #DelhiKnockoutRound
seedhi Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 then you would have known that BJP had paid Bukhari to declare support for AAP' date=' so that they lose. Still you went ahead and posted this news [b']removing any reference of BJP.What is this reference that was removed?
Raghav_12 Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 You throw around so many wild allegations that its difficult to distinguish reality from sarcasm :giggle: like two-wheeler ones :-)
Sachin=GOD Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 like two-wheeler ones :-) That was from a news channel...not something made up.
Recommended Posts