AmreekanDesi Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 odumbe also??? did marlon samuels spend jail time? dont think so. i think jail time depends on countries. if marlon samuel fixed in england he would go to jail. other countries dont have the same law
Marut Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Perhaps he was full of potential when he was banned, but he hadn't proved anything really. Averaged 40 in Aus, 43 in NZ, 44 in SL and 20 in England. He was successful only under highly favourable bowling conditions during the early English summer. No one knows how good he would be now after so many years of isolation, because even at the time of ban he was yet to prove anything big. Asif was a proven bowler at the time of the ban, Amir simply wasn't.
jf1gp_1 Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Everyone deserves a second chance. I am fine with him playing again. surely you dont believe it, would you be fine with sreesanth making a come back ?
IKnowU Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Perhaps he was full of potential when he was banned, but he hadn't proved anything really. Averaged 40 in Aus, 43 in NZ, 44 in SL and 20 in England. He was successful only under highly favourable bowling conditions during the early English summer. No one knows how good he would be now after so many years of isolation, because even at the time of ban he was yet to prove anything big. Asif was a proven bowler at the time of the ban, Amir simply wasn't. I rather pick him and lose with his "unproven" talent than then our so called "proved and tested" phasssttt bowlers
IKnowU Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 surely you dont believe it' date=' would you be fine with sreesanth making a come back ?[/quote'] The circumstances are totally different, Amir had the world at his feet about to enter greatness before being led astray, being young and naive to the consequences. Meanwhile Sreesanth was a washed up player trying to make a quick buck on top of his already more then decent paycheck in the IPL.
Marut Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 I rather pick him and lose with his "unproven" talent than then our so called "proved and tested" phasssttt bowlers I would rather lose with honest players than lose with fixers!
Guldozer Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 He was only a kid when it happened. He definitely deserves another chance. Everyone makes mistakes and he has already been punished for it. And I'm pretty sure that he would never fix again.
IKnowU Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 I would rather lose with honest players than lose with fixers! Totally irrelevant to your original argument.
Marut Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Totally irrelevant to your original argument. Why? Is there a rule that I can use only one argument in a thread? These two arguments aren't contradictory anyway. 1. We know nothing about Amir's game now, because of his five year hiatus. He showed promise before the ban, but he did not set the world on fire before his ban. 2. Even if his class in intact now inspite of the ban, I would not want a fixer like him playing for India and very few in India would support these people. Of course PCB and Paks can do what they want.
Mahaa Raavana Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Everyone deserves a second chance. I am fine with him playing again. +1 He was a naive ,stupid kid..must have thought "what harm would a single no ball do in a test match" when he committed the crime..He served his time and unlike butt or asif deserves a second chance.. Likes of Srinivasan,Lalit Modi are bigger chors and have done bigger crimes against the sport we love..
termination Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Sad day for cricket. This CHOR is allowed to be back playing for his country which he sold for few pounds. This thief will be allowed to play the game for which he was jailed. This traitor will be cheered by his fans again whom they betrayed. But then since the country is Pakistan, this is quite natural I suppose. Lets not forget that he was only 18 or 17 at that time.He pleaded guilty unlike butt and asif.He has been co-operating with icc anti corruption unit and went through rehabilation.
Austin 3:!6 Posted January 24, 2015 Author Posted January 24, 2015 +1 He was a naive ,stupid kid..must have thought "what harm would a single no ball do in a test match" when he committed the crime..He served his time and unlike butt or asif deserves a second chance.. Likes of Srinivasan,Lalit Modi are bigger chors and have done bigger crimes against the sport we love.. Pathetic arguement. The same kid who was intelligent enough to bowl no balls for 12K pounds. Same kid who was shedding crocodile tears to prove his innocence after being busted by NWO. Same kid lied infront of media saying he was framed. Same kid intelligent enough to admit later that he did sold his country when he realized he had no where to run. If all minors are spared after a crime because of age the world will be filled with criminals. The Delhi rape case accused was also a 17 year old minor...Shall we pardon him too because he was a Kid? Not drawing a comparison here but to say a 17 year old person is not intelligent enough to differenciate between good or bad is bull sh!t arguement.
Austin 3:!6 Posted January 24, 2015 Author Posted January 24, 2015 Lets not forget that he was only 18 or 17 at that time.He pleaded guilty unlike butt and asif.He has been co-operating with icc anti corruption unit and went through rehabilation. BTW as per sources PCB is already planning to take Asif back after his ban over in 2017
MK55 Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 I was sympathetic for Amir and felt bad for his naiveness but then this made me a bit ambivalent http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/800583.html Ramiz: In fact, to quote an incident, I was approached to find out why Amir had turned down a more-than-decent offer made to him by an English county just a day before he was caught. During my conversation with him regarding the offer, I realised that because the offer was a few thousand pounds short of what he expected, he was willing to let go of an opportunity to play and establish himself at a renowned and historic county. I came to the conclusion that he was not, after all, so gullible and naive about money matters..
Guldozer Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Pathetic arguement. The same kid who was intelligent enough to bowl no balls for 12K pounds. Same kid who was shedding crocodile tears to prove his innocence after being busted by NWO. Same kid lied infront of media saying he was framed. Same kid intelligent enough to admit later that he did sold his country when he realized he had no where to run. If all minors are spared after a crime because of age the world will be filled with criminals. The Delhi rape case accused was also a 17 year old minor...Shall we pardon him too because he was a Kid? Not drawing a comparison here but to say a 17 year old person is not intelligent enough to differenciate between good or bad is bull sh!t arguement. He has served his punishment. 5 years is a long time.
Austin 3:!6 Posted January 24, 2015 Author Posted January 24, 2015 He has served his punishment. 5 years is a long time. His ban expires on August and he is allowed to play from Feb. 6 months of liniency
Iconoclast Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 BTW as per sources PCB is already planning to take Asif back after his ban over in 2017 Why not if he's served his punishment ? BTW his ban is over in September and he'll be 32 then ... He's still got some cricket left in him. He was the number 2 ranked bowler when he was banned and I reckon he'll still be the second best after Steyn.
Texy Posted January 24, 2015 Posted January 24, 2015 Yes he has served his punishment but wouldn't there be doubts every time a No ball comes along. Every result involving him in the squad would be questioned. There's a very small chance but what if he does it again? Wouldn't that destroy whatever reputation the team has left? Willing to risk all that and accept constant scrutiny to have Amir back?
Austin 3:!6 Posted January 24, 2015 Author Posted January 24, 2015 Why not if he's served his punishment ? BTW his ban is over in September and he'll be 32 then ... He's still got some cricket left in him. He was the number 2 ranked bowler when he was banned and I reckon he'll still be the second best after Steyn. Asif was a serial offender.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now