Asim Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 Pls answer the Q in Y or N - would Pak agree to the proposed swap? Regarding your analogy its highly flawedl. Would you trade that 1 final for a 9-0 thumping by england in a bilateral series? England wins in 1992 Pak wins some bilateral series 9-0 1 week after. 10 game record is 9-1 for Pakistan? Do you know what happened after the 1983 world cup when India won? West Indies came to India and beat them like 5 or 7 - 0. Do you think anyone remembers? Anyone cares besides hardcore cricket fans posting on these boards? Do you think Viv Richards would trade that entire series for a replay of the game with India at Lords? I dont get how 6-4 regular game track record is domination but 10-0 in world cup matches is not? The fact remains Pakistan has lost very badly in front of 1 billion viewers and now they have turned to this arcane pacification of Sharjah matches to console them. I doubt even if you read others posts completely :D Where does question of WC trading comes from? when my whole point of explanation is neither overall record can effect WC stats nor WC stats do represent overall record.
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 72:51 is a clear dominance indeed... btw never knew Dhoni belongs to Lahore :cantstop: 7:5 is domination? :facepalm:
jonas10 Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 I doubt even if you read others posts completely :D Where does question of WC trading comes from? when my whole point of explanation is neither overall record can effect WC stats nor WC stats do represent overall record. Were discussing what in fact is the superior record to have. As I've proven Indians have no interest in bilateral series with Pakistan or Pakistanis would be jumping off bridges to play India considering the money BCCI has to throw around. The question is if overall record is such a contentious point for India why arnt they organizing games to right their course? I guess they dont care now do they? I'm pretty sure Pakistanis would love a do over of all 10 world cup games against India.
Asim Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 7:5 is domination? :facepalm: :facepalm: cant change the fact :--D
vijay50 Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 :facepalm: cant change the fact :--D 72-51. Let me put it differently for you, if you do not understand. Its called "being ahead, not domination".
Asim Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 I can understand how u guys getting irritated with word domination :D but the bottom line is: Pakistan dominated india overall in ODIs... clearly ahead in Tests too... but many congrats to indian fans, their team clearly dominating Pak in T20s, ThankU :)
bulbul Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 I can understand how u guys getting irritated with word domination :D but the bottom line is: Pakistan dominated india overall in ODIs... clearly ahead in Tests too... but many congrats to indian fans' date=' their team clearly dominating Pak in T20s, ThankU :)[/quote'] Still 6-0 :phehehe:
CG Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 I can understand how u guys getting irritated with word domination :D but the bottom line is: Pakistan dominated india overall in ODIs... clearly ahead in Tests too... but many congrats to indian fans' date=' their team clearly dominating Pak in T20s, ThankU :)[/quote'] :two_thumbs_up: Whatever floats your boat.Most of us are happy with our wc domnination.
jonas10 Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 I can understand how u guys getting irritated with word domination :D but the bottom line is: Pakistan dominated india overall in ODIs... clearly ahead in Tests too... but many congrats to indian fans' date=' their team clearly dominating Pak in T20s, ThankU :)[/quote'] Irritated isnt entirely correct. Its say its more comedic with the use of domination. 6-4 is hardly domination. Again if 6-4 is domination what is 10-0?:cantstop:
Old guy Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 Irritated isnt entirely correct. Its say its more comedic with the use of domination. 6-4 is hardly domination. Again if 6-4 is domination what is 10-0?:cantstop: humiliation..
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 :facepalm: cant change the fact :--D 10:0 is domination not 5:7..:facepalm:
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 71-51 is rivalry' date=' 0-9 is domination.[/quote'] its 0-10
AmreekanDesi Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 only record paki fans can be proud of and indians should aspire to is the test head to head these odi pajama bilaterals are pretty pointless in the grander scheme of things
Shivaji bhonsle Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 I can understand how u guys getting irritated with word domination :D but the bottom line is: Pakistan dominated india overall in ODIs... clearly ahead in Tests too... but many congrats to indian fans' date=' their team clearly dominating Pak in T20s, ThankU :)[/quote'] I can understand how frustrating for you to see your pussy batsmen got bounced out by Indian fast bowlers and if I were you, I would be doing the same thing, going to padosi forum and trying to troll. Lol. I know how much it hurts for you to see your team lose so badly against India. I know lot of my Pakistani fans went into depression after the loses against India in the world cup . If icf helps you to come out of the depression by trolling here, we are happy to help you bro. Keep posting, the more you post, the more I know how much you are hurt. :D
Vilander Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 its 0-10 its 0-6 in WC and 0-1-3 in Wt20 to be precise..so chose 0-9 selectively to show ICC 'world' events..:winky:
AmreekanDesi Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 its 0-6 in WC and 0-1-3 in Wt20 to be precise..so chose 0-9 selectively to show ICC 'world' events..:winky: what abt champions trophy then? its simple 6-0 domination in WCs which is more than enough
bulbul Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 what abt champions trophy then? its simple 6-0 domination in WCs which is more than enough Including 1985? :cantstop:
AmreekanDesi Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 Including 1985? :cantstop: no just ICC cricket world cup In ICC ODI worl events its prolly like 2-2 or 3-2 to us in ICC T20 - its 3-0 to us in all ICC world events its like 11-2 to us
amiret Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 Dhoni should NOT have said "they have really dominated" The word "dominated" is the problem . He could have said "they have done slightly better over the years in irrelevant matches."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now