gattaca Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 You need to realise we've made our bowling a tad weaker in favour of making our batting a lot stronger' date=' if we wanted a real quality attack we would've selected Harris-Pattinson and Lyon, our bowling isn't exacly weak, we have 3 test quicks in our best 11 still, and Faulkner is a quality ODI bowler, 5th bowler is a problem but who hasn't got that problem?[/quote'] Harris would not last two matches bowling in Odis (will add to work load )will put more strain on his body. Pattinson doesn't has great stats. When was las time Lyon played in Odis.
Clarke Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 Might just look weak on those 360/1 pitches, they're actually well off with some backup available. They have 5 seamers who can complete their quota (Johnson, Starc, Hazlewood/Cummins & 2 of Watson/Marsh/Faulkner) besides the part time spinners (Maxwell followed by Smith followed by Warner). No other team has such depth in batting as well as bowling when seamers are preferable over spinners. They could very well squeeze in 6 seamers with Faulkner at 8 coming in place of Maxwell. These aren't the Virat Kohli dibbly dobbly seamers, they (at least Watson & Marsh) can claim a place in tests as an all rounder.
MCGGG Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 Harris would not last two matches bowling in Odis will put more strain on his body. Pattinson doesn't has great stats. When was las time Lyon played in Odis. So Harris can play 5 tests but he couldn't get through 2 ODIs? Kden.
gattaca Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 So Harris can play 5 tests but he couldn't get through 2 ODIs? Kden. Last time he played against he didn't even last 4 test matches.i am saying work load. Of he had played he wouldn't last group stages also he was never a regular in your team in Odis. Now you are talking like England playing test specialists in Odis.
MCGGG Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 No he shouldn't have! Pattinson is pretty average in 50 over cricket for staters let alone the fact we have a more important Ashes tour just after the WC. The most important day is the current one.
MCGGG Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 Last time he played against he didn't even last 4 test matches.i am saying work load. Of he had played he wouldn't last group stages also he was never a regular in your team in Odis. Now you are talking like England playing test specialists in Odis. Pretty sure he unofficially retired from ODIs, but he officially put his hand to play in the WC, he's probably in the top 5 quicks going around ATM and he has the heart of a lion.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now