jonas10 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Bouncer is a legitimate delivery and Starc was within his rights to bowl it. There is no mandatory rule that he has to be "nice to tailender". Agreed there is also no rule that you cant throw an intentional no baller at his head if youre leading by 100 runs.
Thalaiva Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Its not cheap. They were all a sea of tears for Phil Hughes and even all the Indians on this forum were sad. We now see how much they actually care for players safety when a team is about to lose by 100 runs and a tail ender is batting. Umesh should play in womens cricket according to your logic
jonas10 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Umesh should play in womens cricket according to your logic Why no bouncers in womens cricket? According to your logic Starc should have ripped a no ball right at his helmet to get him off his game. Why not do that as well why just bounce it at his face?
Zero_Unit Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Shame on Starc for bowling bouncers to tail enders. What exactly is the point of it? Tail enders are not skilled enough to negotiate bouncers. As a result Yadav got hurt and even bleeded. Then the Aussies pretended to care only for Starc to comes back and bowl a bouncer again. That's against the spirit of the game. Starc also kept sledging Wahab Riaz while bowling to him. He must think bullying and bowling out tail enders is some kind of achievement. Starc can thank his stars that he never faced Wahab's bowling later. Looking at how clueless Watson was against Wahab's bouncers, Starc would've ended up bleeding. What a douche. WTF is so shamefull about it? If you're on the field better be able to take the heat or gtfo of the match. Where does it say in the rule that a bowler can't bowl bouncers to number 11? That's a legit way to get them out early and asap. Sledging is also a part of the game to dismantle the player's concentration. This is what seperates the loosers from the winners mentality. Give less excuses and work on your weakness ... regardless of it you're a number 1 or number 11.
dial_100 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Nohing wrong. It's a game and some day it will come back to bite him for sure. That's all. Let's move on. It's a stupid play-tuff crap from Aussies. We gotta take it.
Sachinism Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 I think all of you are idiots. Firstly the bouncer is a completely legitimate delivery. Secondly the bouncer is an effective method of getting tailenders out as they often either go for it or fend the ball off. Thirdly it is a good setup ball as it was in this case. It pushes players back and then the bowler can pitch up. Nothing wrong with Starc or Aus with this approach. If Yadav can't hack it, maybe cricket isn't for him. This. So what if Yadav is a tailender. That is what fast bowlers do.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 All power to Starc and company for bowling bouncers at whomever they please. It's a competitive professional sport (cricket) we are playing, not some Peewee league. If someone can't handle the heat, he needs to get out of the kitchen. I would expect my fast bowlers to target the opponent's weak spot and if the opponents do the same, so be it. I'm glad Indian team is not coming out with such lame moans.
HippoSucks Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Anyone who takes objective to anyone bowling a bouncer (given it does not violate the quota per over) to anyone is extremely partial towards India or simply idiotic. I'm not a fan of bouncers, especially if they can cause some harm to the batsman, but admonishing Starc for bowling 2 bouncers is ridiculous.
brendan07 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Anyone who takes objective to anyone bowling a bouncer (given it does not violate the quota per over) to anyone is extremely partial towards India or simply idiotic. I'm not a fan of bouncers' date=' especially if they can cause some harm to the batsman, but admonishing Starc for bowling 2 bouncers is ridiculous.[/quote'] Plus unlike MJ, who does bend the rules a bit, Starc sticks to the 2 bouncers an over. Lets be honest here, if Yada wasn't hit, would anyone care? Maybe the batsman should take some responsibility for the position he got into.
jonas10 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 The point is aussies are two faced snakes. They cry crocodile tears of Phil Hughes and then want to injure tail enders. Reminds me of viv Richards when Thompson straight up told him if he hooks him he'll be a cripple for the rest of his life. They downright like hurting people. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
HippoSucks Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 The point is aussies are two faced snakes. They cry crocodile tears of Phil Hughes and then want to injure tail enders. Reminds me of viv Richards when Thompson straight up told him if he hooks him he'll be a cripple for the rest of his life. They downright like hurting people. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk Slight bleeding and someone dying is very different. If you think their sorrow for Hughes' death were fake ("crocodile tears"), you are ridiculously biased.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 The point is aussies are two faced snakes. They cry crocodile tears of Phil Hughes and then want to injure tail enders. Reminds me of viv Richards when Thompson straight up told him if he hooks him he'll be a cripple for the rest of his life. They downright like hurting people. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk They are entitled to bowl whatever they want to and nobody's stopping us from doing so either. Whining about being bounced is pointless and childish.
brendan07 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 The point is aussies are two faced snakes. They cry crocodile tears of Phil Hughes and then want to injure tail enders. Reminds me of viv Richards when Thompson straight up told him if he hooks him he'll be a cripple for the rest of his life. They downright like hurting people. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk Okay lets just bowl underarm.... Seriously 1 accident that would happen 1 in a trillion is not enough to stop bowling a bouncer. Even Phil Hughes' family would say the exact same thing. Bouncers are not bowled to hurt people, they are bowled to set people up!:hatsoff:
jonas10 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Slight bleeding and someone dying is very different. If you think their sorrow for Hughes' death were fake ("crocodile tears")' date=' you are ridiculously biased.[/quote'] Yes they do care for their own Australian players but have zero issue intentionally trying to hurt Yadav. Despite their pretend concerns they had zero issue only a few months later resuming the same reckless behavior. Karma is a real ***** and its no surprise that it was an Australian that died given how they like to bully everyone.
jonas10 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Okay lets just bowl underarm.... Seriously 1 accident that would happen 1 in a trillion is not enough to stop bowling a bouncer. Even Phil Hughes' family would say the exact same thing. Bouncers are not bowled to hurt people, they are bowled to set people up!:hatsoff: Cool why not no ball a beamer at Yadavs head as well? Bouncers at tail enders are bowled to hurt them.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Yes they do care for their own Australian players but have zero issue intentionally trying to hurt Yadav. Despite their pretend concerns they had zero issue only a few months later resuming the same reckless behavior. Karma is a real ***** and its no surprise that it was an Australian that died given how they like to bully everyone. Bowling a bouncer is part and parcel of the game, especially fast bowling. The day bouncers are outlawed fast bowling will lose its lustre. Our pacers used bouncers to good effect as well this world cup so how would you justify that?
HippoSucks Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Yes they do care for their own Australian players but have zero issue intentionally trying to hurt Yadav. Despite their pretend concerns they had zero issue only a few months later resuming the same reckless behavior. Karma is a real ***** and its no surprise that it was an Australian that died given how they like to bully everyone. Bouncers are a part of the game. Yadav and the other Indian bowlers bowled numerous bouncers and a lot of short balls at 140 km/h. I don't see you saying anything to them. If you are against bouncers, be against them no matter who is bowling them. "Pretend concerns"? If Kohli is fatally injured from a bouncer by Yadav in the IPL, and Indians mourn, what will you say when the Australians claim you are faking it?
brendan07 Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Cool why not no ball a beamer at Yadavs head as well? Bouncers at tail enders are bowled to hurt them. One is illegal and very dangerous, the other is legal and regulated (2 per over). You realise Yadav bowled his fair share of bouncers right? Bouncers are used to set a batman up, get them on the back foot, then fire in the yorker which Starc did. It was a PERFECT set up.
Zero_Unit Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Yes they do care for their own Australian players but have zero issue intentionally trying to hurt Yadav. Despite their pretend concerns they had zero issue only a few months later resuming the same reckless behavior. Karma is a real ***** and its no surprise that it was an Australian that died given how they like to bully everyone. WOW dude, you're a f'ing disgrace to even bring stuffs up like that. I get it that you have personal opinions but some opinions deserves to be kicked down the stairs and your opinion completely falls in that category. Am actually out of words to even see a fellow cricket fans with opinions like that. HOw are the mods not giving you a warning for your behavior is beyond me ...
jonas10 Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 WOW dude' date=' you're a f'ing disgrace to even bring stuffs up like that. I get it that you have personal opinions but some opinions deserves to be kicked down the stairs and your opinion completely falls in that category. Am actually out of words to even see a fellow cricket fans with opinions like that. HOw are the mods not giving you a warning for your behavior is beyond me ...[/quote'] Lol for a guy that likes to proclaim how everything done is within their right you certainly have problems with my comments. Nothing that I've said is wrong. Australians want to cry of Phil Hughes and then aim to intentionally injure a tail ender when they got a 100 run lead. Their hypocrisy is shamefully obvious. This wasn't rahane they were pitching up to. It was a non batsmen who could have been hurt. They might as well have done a few aggressive no balls at his head. It mean 1 per bowler is allowed each match right?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now