Jump to content

Supreme court rulings


tweaker

Recommended Posts

Marriage practices itself has been anti women in India. Should courts ban marriages?

 

Practice or law ?

 

Here law is allowed to abuse Women in the case of Polygamy.

 

This is like child marriage.Just because marriages are abused in practise doesn't mean we allow Child marriage by law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeautifulGame said:

 

Practice or law ?

 

Here law is allowed to abuse Women in the case of Polygamy.

 

This is like child marriage.Just because marriages are abused in practise doesn't mean we allow Child marriage by law.

Practice. A Muslim man is told by Imam at the time of marriage. This is your first marriage. There are three more left. Come later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where has a whopping amount of Rs 20,000 crore, meant for workers' welfare, gone? Spent on tea parties or vacation of officials?

 

Even the Comptroller and Auditor General doesn't know, wondered the Supreme Court.

 

These posers were put to the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) by the Supreme Court which was left wondering as to where this huge amount of money has gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) today told the Supreme Court that triple talaq is a matter of faith being practiced by Muslims for the last 1,400 years and hence the question of constitutional morality and equity did not arise. The Muslim body also equated triple talaq with the Hindu belief that Lord Rama was born at Ayodhya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone following the triple talak case in SC would realize that SC as currently constituted is a gone case. Needs total rebuilding. Stripped of any gungadeens or dhimmis. After congress mukt bharat is achieved in 2 years, Sangh needs to make this their #1 priority. You can bet your life savings that resident lordships will try their damnedest to revive the corpse of congress.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As many as 10.52 lakh 'bogus' PAN cards of individual income tax assesses, which is around 0.4 per cent of the total such documents, cannot be termed a 'minuscule' number to harm the country's economy, the Supreme Court has said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a first, High Court judge CS Karnan became the only judge to retire while absconding. He has been evading the police since May 9 after the Supreme Court sanctioned an arrest warrant against him, sentencing him to a six-month jail term. The Supreme Court had held Karnan in contempt of court following a series of defiant counter-orders he had repeatedly issued against the apex court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making another serious observation on the government's demonetisation deadline that stopped people from exchanging their old notes beyond December 30, the Supreme Court today said the government can't deny citizens, who have valid reasons, the right to swap the scrapped notes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Supreme Court on Wednesday noted that embattled Sahara chief Subrata Roy has deposited Rs 710.22 crore in the SEBI-Sahara account, but warned that its cheque of Rs 552.21 crore must be realised within the July 15 deadline.

 

The apex court rejected Roy's request to extend time beyond July 15 for realisation of this cheque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking probe and prosecution of various persons, including separatist leader Yasin Malik, for offences including murder of over 700 Kashmiri Pandits during the height of militancy in the Valley in 1989-90.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked Sahara Group's chief Subrata Roy to deposit Rs 1,500 crore with market regulator Sebi (Securities and Exchange Board of India) and directed the Bombay High Court liquidator to start the process of selling Sahara's Aamby Valley property. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments to rule on whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution to all Indian citizens.

 

The verdict will be divulged any day now, and it will surely be a crucial one – not only because privacy has become a primary debate in the Digital Age but also because of the intrinsic links between privacy and the government’s push to increase the mandate of Aadhaar and UIDAI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...