Mosher Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 (edited) 3 wickets for Lalit. Bengal 11/3. Getting some seam movement at a decent pace. Excellent bowling. Edited November 11, 2017 by Mosher express bowling 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 12 minutes ago, Mosher said: 3 wickets for Lalit. Bengal 11/3. Getting some seam movement at a decent pace. Excellent bowling. Lalit Yadav looks like a prolific wicket-taker like Shami, Siraj and Bumrah Mosher 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 17 minutes ago, express bowling said: Lalit Yadav looks like a prolific wicket-taker like Shami, Siraj and Bumrah In earlier games when he played alongside Umesh, he looked like trying too hard, to match Umesh in pace and in that effort was losing his shape. Link to comment
express bowling Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 8 minutes ago, rkt.india said: In earlier games when he played alongside Umesh, he looked like trying too hard, to match Umesh in pace and in that effort was losing his shape. Probably. But, he needs to use the bouncer more often Link to comment
LORD_analyst Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 9 minutes ago, rkt.india said: In earlier games when he played alongside Umesh, he looked like trying too hard, to match Umesh in pace and in that effort was losing his shape. same was the case with gordon greenidge and viv richards ...while batting Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, express bowling said: Probably. But, he needs to use the bouncer more often yes, he needs to work on his short ball. His body falls away when he tries to bowl bouncer, very much like Ishant. Link to comment
LORD_analyst Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 7 minutes ago, express bowling said: Probably. But, he needs to use the bouncer more often saw his bowling....generally bowls back of length....needs to bowl much fuller ...batsmen easily go on back foot to play back of length...needs to bowl the length where batsman is confused with forward or backward with no foot movement...just like zaheer khan Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said: saw his bowling....generally bowls back of length....needs to bowl much fuller ...batsmen easily go on back foot to play back of length...needs to bowl the length where batsman is confused with forward or backward with no foot movement...just like zaheer khan check the videos i posted in the new thread. all are those type of lengths you are talking abouut. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 left arm seamer Lukman Meriwala from Baroda is not bad too. Link to comment
express bowling Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said: saw his bowling....generally bowls back of length....needs to bowl much fuller ...batsmen easily go on back foot to play back of length...needs to bowl the length where batsman is confused with forward or backward with no foot movement...just like zaheer khan Has bowled a very good length in the 2nd innings. Some of the short of length balls are set-up deliveries to much fuller deliveries too. Edited November 11, 2017 by express bowling Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Meriwala is hitting the bat hard. Link to comment
LORD_analyst Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 13 minutes ago, express bowling said: Has bowled a very good length in the 2nd innings. Some of the short of length balls are set-up deliveries to much fuller deliveries too. what do you think of- Rudderless Shami proves too costly | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo ???? Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said: what do you think of- Rudderless Shami proves too costly | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo ???? Shami was wayward. Lalit has not been wayward. Shami has improved a lot since he improved his runup. Shami had a bad runup that led to lack of control. There is no such issue with Lalit. Edited November 11, 2017 by rkt.india Link to comment
express bowling Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said: what do you think of- Rudderless Shami proves too costly | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo ???? 3 years back. Shami is a much more mature and accurate test bowler now. Moreover, it was the series when Shami's knee injury surfaced for the first time and affected his rhythm Link to comment
LORD_analyst Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Shami was wayward. Lalit has not been wayward. Shami has improved a lot since he improved his runup. Shami had a bad runup that led to lack of control. There is no such issue with Lalit. shami was going at 5.5r po in recent sri lanka tests for his first spell ...in each innings while our ATG phaassst yadav was going at 6 rpo Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 1 minute ago, LORD_analyst said: shami was going at 5.5r po in recent sri lanka tests for his first spell ...in each innings while our ATG phaassst yadav was going at 6 rpo He picked 10 wickets in that series at an average of 17 and an ER of 2.9. No idea what are you talking about. Jimmy Cliff 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Sheth has been taken for runs while Meriwala has bowled better as the pitch has flattened out. Link to comment
LORD_analyst Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, rkt.india said: He picked 10 wickets in that series at an average of 17 and an ER of 2.9. No idea what are you talking about. first spell...he made up the economy well in 2,3,4 th spells Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said: first spell...he made up the economy well in 2,3,4 th spells maybe because new ball comes onto the bat well and is the best time to bat in normal SC conditions. Link to comment
LORD_analyst Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 7 minutes ago, rkt.india said: maybe because new ball comes onto the bat well and is the best time to bat in normal SC conditions. yup ....attacking bowlers generally go for runs ...but ATG PHASSST yadav seems a bit-legsidh at times and can be expensive too Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now