arkay Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 The Quality of commentary yesterday was very good. When ozzies are not playing, the commentary team is very fair and balanced. They don't keep raving about how an ozzie is so good, how he played or how is? It was refreshing to see the likes of Healy, Slats commentate the game as it happens rather than be so biased. What are your thoughts? Does it make sense to bring balance? Link to comment
Ram Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Ian Healy HAS to be one of THE most biased cricketers on the planet. Time after time after time, when Gilly dropped sitters in the test series, he didnt utter a single word of criticism, but yesterday, when Sangakkara dropped a relatively tough chance, he termed it a "terrible miss". Healy is rabidly pro-Aussie, Slater is enthusiastically Aussie, Benaud is like a guest commentator, Chappell is treated like an old senile man, while only Taylor brings in any sense of perspective. And as far as Mark Nicholas is concerned, well, we all know the Aussies have bought him for 15 gallons of insecticide or whatever. He literally swoons at any good performance by an Aussie. I wont be surprised if, the next time Andrew Symonds makes a good fielding effort, he starts crying on camera, overcome by emotion. Link to comment
talksport Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 You guys still listen to TV Commentary.. I do sometimes for laughs The only commentary I listen to is TMS when on Link to comment
King Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 I think Bill Lawry is top class, Slater isn't that bad and Tony Grieg is bearable. Slater makes a lot of subtle points that are cricket related. The rest are making up numbers that's about it. Meanwhile I like Mark Nicholas' enthusiasm. He can get carried away by the Aussie praise at times but I think he enjoys a good knock or a good spell by anyone against the Aussies deep down. Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Slater and Healy are basically cheerleaders. Pathetic. Nicholas is desperate to extend his aussie comm contracts so is also a cheerleader. Really rubbish commentary Link to comment
mhr123 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 I like to hear Ravi Shastri, SG, Boycott , Wasim , Ian , Hype created Tony Grieg they all have very good knowledge of the game and share with all of us ,Harsha's way of broadcasting and Presentation is also too good... I short ESPN STAR commentary panel is the best.Channel 9 doesn't even come closer to it.:alienbooty: Link to comment
bunny Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Very few commentators are worth listening to. Even Shastri and Gavaskar are terrible. Gavaskar is too critical of the Aussie way and seems to love SRT more than Rohan Gavaskar. Shastri is plain stupid. Yesterday he said "India wasted 1 year of GG". He likes each and every youngster. He is no less biased than Greg Chappell. I like Bill Lawry because at least he brings a lot of genuine excitement and passion to the proceedings. Michael Holding is witty and usually balanced and calm. There are some really good analytical commentators out there, but most of them know only about their own team (Nasser Hussain being a prime example). But still they are much much better than Healy, Robin Jackman and their likes. Link to comment
Deleted_User_1 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 I LOVE Bill Lawry. A genuine lover of cricket.........his commentary is the only one that gets me pumped. I hope he carries on a bit more. Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 I am not taking the pee when I say this. I genuinely like Arun Lals commentary. He is jokey, not bias, does not take it to seriously and has a very soothing voice. Sure he makes the odd error but he is entertaing to listen to and in fact his mistakes make him more likeable! He is like your fav uncle who likes the odd drink and you enjoy listening to when he is a bit merry! Link to comment
kooljatt Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Who is the best commentator....!!!! is it tony greig or boycott ? or is it taylor or lawry ? have ur pick guys....i'l go for bumble...the guy is just true entertainer:hatsoff::hatsoff::hatsoff:...just watch this video [ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=gLQ3f7QQ2ms]YouTube - Funny Moments of Summer Cricket 2006 from England[/ame] Link to comment
Cricketics Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 papajohnz pizza team.. Link to comment
kooljatt Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 :haha::giggle::hysterical:papajohnz pizza team.. Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 I dont have any fav but I do hate slater ! Link to comment
maggot_brain Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Bumble's hilarious and he loves India too, gets my vote. Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Bumble is ok but can be as bias against inida as others. Was one of the idiots when we whooped them in test seires to keep on waffling about india getting luck with the toss blah blah. WAS A TOTAL PRAT THROUGH THAT SERIES! Link to comment
kumble_rocks Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Bill Lawry , Ravi Shastri are the two best , imo. Link to comment
CC1981 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 I find Lawry to be very observant but i hate his delivery style. He seems like a lil kid attending his first Olympic 100m finale. My favourite commentators are : Ian Bishop, Mikey Holding, Boycott, Bhogle, Tony Cozier and Benaud. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now